monkeydelarge: NO. Movies can do everything a book does and more. And yes, movies can be made in such a way that allows the audience to use their imagination too even though imagination is overrated. The problem is, people are judging movies based on the majority of movies out today and that is just wrong. Because those movies were not designed to compete with books. They were designed to provide entertainment for 2 or 3 hours or less.
tinyE: Won't you admit that there are a few great books that simply don't work as movies and fail miserably when it gets tried?
No. Those who have tried, have simply failed or did not intend to create something that competes against the book.
I'm guessing, people just don't want to make movies that compete with books because
A) it will be too much work.
B) It will be too expensive.
C) They won't make enough money to justify, the whole thing.
If your goal is to simply make $$$, better to create some shitty 2 hour movie with lots of special effects and romance.
But if someone just wanted to prove people wrong and had the resources and brains to do so, that person could make a movie that makes every book today, not even worth reading. Because a movie can do exactly what a book does, but add sounds and images... Add music... And remember that saying, a picture is worth a thousand words...?