CymTyr: In the end, the 5000 series ended up being too expensive. Now that AMD is leading, they're increasing their profit margin. Which isn't a bad thing, but kind of negates the entire point of getting AMD hardware, at least for me.
clarry: Interesting perspective..
I got my R7 1800X for 599 EUR when it launched. Now I paid 589 EUR for the much more powerful R9 5900X.
Ryzen was never a "budget CPU" for me, but a high end one.
The equivalent of the 3600 is the 5600X, which iirc is ~$50 more expensive than the 3600 was at launch. It's not a huge difference, but it's a difference. I'm willing to wait for technology to advance a little more before upgrading from my 3600, which was my point.
I see what you're saying and absolutely agree it's not a huge difference. However, it is a difference. At least, here in the US. I could get a 3800X/T for around $300 right now, which in theory would give me more of a performance boost than a 5600X. Just stuff to think about and speculate.
Also I have to keep in mind my previous philosophy was getting a system and sporting it for 3-5 years, which I stopped doing when I got the Ryzen 2600 and then this year upgraded to a 3600. The GPU just got replaced this past year from a GTX 1060 I bought in 2016, so that lasted 4 years, and if I want to buy a new one, I'm going against my tenets of system building and maintenance.
-SimTeer