Remember
this other thread as well.
Now, we finally get some communication, after 2 and 1/3 months. And that communication is largely PR, doesn't promise anything, doesn't give any deadlines... The only specific things said are some things that won't be done.
Among those things that won't be done is the removal of the autoplay on hover. One of the main requests just struck right down. Why is that? Gather that, on top of dismissing all those who dislike the idea, GOG specifically doesn't want anyone who's very careful about their bandwidth use due to a restrictive metered connection or anyone with a poor computer or who for any reason has little system resources free for browsing to be using their site. And it's not like you even can avoid hovering if you want to even see the title of the game (admittedly, it wasn't clearly specified that that won't return, but that's because it wasn't mentioned at all). And that lack of title on page also prevents searching for anything in browser, or scrolling through pages without likely needing minutes for each.
About GOGMixes, I doubt the spam or otherwise pointless ones showed up on too many game pages, since that was decided according to number of votes. And there were some quite useful mixes, and plenty of others there for anyone who cared, or many likely mainly for the personal use of their creators. Saying that they just didn't work with the new site so they were removed doesn't justify the move at all. If existing features no longer work after the change and can't be (or for any reason aren't) made to work, the change is the problem (remember manual sorting of library? still asking for that back, by the way). But, regarding mixes, deleting them completely was even worse, making even those who created them, not to mention anyone still using the useful ones, lose all the work put into them, without even, say, a copy of the data being e-mailed to the creators first. Mixes were, and would still be, an important community feature, but also an useful feature for people who just want to manage their games (not necessarily only those owned here) better.
About browsers, that's clear cut, you don't want people around who don't use the browsers you like. Me included. Well, I won't be changing my main browser for one site, and especially for a store, which should reach out to users on the users' terms, not the other way around. Stating again that I tried any other games store I could think of and they worked in IE11, as does any other store I use, and that as far as I'm aware, while quite a few other sites have issues in that case, seems like even my father can use any store he cares to just fine even on the computer still running XP and whatever old browsers work on that.
About filters, OS version filtering is important and seeing it removed was baffling, and I'd say bits would be useful as well when it comes to additions, whether a game is 32 only, 64 only or both. And requirements really should be higher on the game page again by the way, not requiring all that scrolling. Also, for those who care for MP, think that games that require Galaxy for MP should both get a filter and have the matter marked very clearly in a set way and position on the game page, if not even as an icon next to the OS ones, to be seen at a glance.
As for the news, the solution there is very simple, put them back where they were before and as a list, or at least on the other side, instead of those absolutely pointless "collections", if you want the games list on the left for some reason. But there's also the matter of them being just an image and a title, no more text at all, and that so few show up even in total (and way too few to be in any way useful show up at once)... But maybe the worst sign of the change in... mentality is the actual news posts themselves, which tend to just have a couple of sentences now, no longer being "news".