gog2002x: So how much did I really miss out on as far as movies? (this is the bigger question)
Breja: I think Aliens 3 is kind of ok on it's own (though certianly not great either). I feel like the worst thing about it is that it kinda ruins Aliens, which is a far superior movie. I haven't seen Resurrection.
The first AvP movie I actually rather like, but if you're hoping for something on the level of the original AvP comic, you'll be disappointed. You have to approach it as a fun, dumb popcorn flick. If you're ok with that, it's probably the third best (or at least most enjoyable) film in both franchises.
I know this will sound insane to most people, but really for my money the best entry in the Alien series after Aliens franchise was... the Superman vs Aliens comics. It shouldn't work, but it does. It really is a pity Disney and not Warner now owns Aliens, because an adaptation of that, even only in animation, could have been jaw-dropping.
I hear ya and I know what you mean. I went into Wheel of Time series (Prime) with my head full of the book's stories and got quite the shock. If they can be watched somewhere, I'll probably check out these other Alien movies. I've watched enough silly movies (like the classic Blob) and still found myself enjoying them for what they were. I just recalled another called Day of the Triffids (w/o color) or something like that, surprisingly fun movie. I'm remembering old movies all of a sudden lol.
I don't know about the Superman vs Aliens comics (1st time hearing it), but I did read X-Men comics long ago that has Wolverine almost turning into an Alien, but his healing factor fought back the virus. His body actually almost morphed into one, which was wierd seeing it since his bones are either coated or wrapped in Adamantium. If memory serves, I think they even used similar art to the actual Alien movie. It was too long ago, so I can't be sure. I'll have to do a search for that comics later.
Now that I think about it, I may have watched one of the AVP movies (was there more than 1?). Was Danny Glover in it by chance? Now you got me thinking of all these 80s and 90s stuff (or maybe some 2000s too). :)
.
Breja: I think movies from the 80s, and older, often absolutely dwarf most new films. For one thing, obviously, the visuals alone do not a great film make, but even just in that department I'd disagree with you're premise of "raised bar". Very often the new, CGI filled films look way worse than movies from the 80s. It's actually kind of amazing just how bad the CG tends to look in many blockbuster films from the last 15 years or so. It's not even funny how vastly superior something like Terminator 2 looks.
hmcpretender: Yes, well made practical effects top cheap CGI any day of the week. You can very clearly see that in the remastered Star Wars Trilogy. However, not all 80's special effects aged gracefully. Terminator 1 comes to mind, when he is surgically removing his eye and the prosthetic head they used looks like John Travolta and not like Arnold Schwarzenegger. Also the Stop-Motion-Terminator later in that movie rather makes me laugh rather than cower in fear. That being said it is still a good movie!
Haha, I remember that scene, it was so funny thinking about it later on. Though back then, I honestly didn't think much about it, so maybe my expectations were much lower during the 80s and 90s. I mean everything was new and exciting to me back then. If they rest of the movie wasn't so amazing, that scene might have stood out too much.
Damn, this thread has got me so nostasgic, I want to hop on Tubi and other sites to see how many 80s and 90s movies I can rewatch this weekend lol.
.