It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Library game pages look so poor now without the Downloader button *sniff sniff*

Other than that, a quick check on the various features says everything else is working as it did before.

@finkleroy, it's in the Forum tab.
I see it now. I figured it would be in the Forum tab, but didn't see it. I was looking for Galaxy 2.0, but I guess it's just called Galaxy. It didn't occur to me that GOG forced 2.0 on everyone who uses Galaxy, so now there's no distinction between the two, so there would be no reason to call it Galaxy 2.0.
avatar
finkleroy: I see it now. I figured it would be in the Forum tab, but didn't see it. I was looking for Galaxy 2.0, but I guess it's just called Galaxy. It didn't occur to me that GOG forced 2.0 on everyone who uses Galaxy, so now there's no distinction between the two, so there would be no reason to call it Galaxy 2.0.
Even before the forced update and afaik, the 1.x versions of Galaxy didn't have their own forum, so there never was a need for a distinction in the labelling of said forum. Am I wrong?
high rated
avatar
finkleroy: I see it now. I figured it would be in the Forum tab, but didn't see it. I was looking for Galaxy 2.0, but I guess it's just called Galaxy. It didn't occur to me that GOG forced 2.0 on everyone who uses Galaxy, so now there's no distinction between the two, so there would be no reason to call it Galaxy 2.0.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Even before the forced update and afaik, the 1.x versions of Galaxy didn't have their own forum, so there never was a need for a distinction in the labelling of said forum. Am I wrong?
Yeah, there's only ever been the one Galaxy forum that I'm aware of so I didn't think it needed 2.0 in the label (plus it might have over complicated the code by including a .)
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Even before the forced update and afaik, the 1.x versions of Galaxy didn't have their own forum, so there never was a need for a distinction in the labelling of said forum. Am I wrong?
I have no idea. I've never looked for one. Thanks for the info.
Good to know, @adaliabooks.

avatar
finkleroy: I have no idea. I've never looked for one. Thanks for the info.
I've never looked for one either, but I remember there being a sticky thread in the General Discussion board for the 1.x versions up until shortly after the 2.0 version hit beta and got its own forum.

Anyway, none of this matters to us. Glad you got it sort out.
avatar
adaliabooks: It's the 2.0 in the id, the dot needs to be escaped with two backslashes or jQuery interprets it as CSS and it doesn't find it.
(I can say this with authority because I had to Google it to figure out why it wasn't working too ;) )
Ha, that's what I was suspecting (since it is the only difference). However I did not know how to solve it. Two backslashes on each side you say? I will try this. Thank you :)

Edit: Oh, obviously already uploaded an update - so I am not longer needed, since the master is here. Even better :D
And (of course) I can confirm that everything is working as it should. Download button is gone and Galaxy forum switchable. Long live the scriptmaster!
Post edited May 04, 2020 by MarkoH01
avatar
HypersomniacLive: I had long ago changed the colour of the Downloader button to be the same whether on or off, and was going to tell you, @Pajama, how to do it manually, but no need since MarkoH01 stepped in with a solution you're happy with.
Thanks :)
avatar
adaliabooks: Ok, I've loaded the update to Gist.
It all seems to still work but I haven't touched it for a long time, so let me know if I've broken anything or if there are any issues.
Thank you - it seems to be working perfectly so far :)
Post edited May 04, 2020 by Pajama
Cool. Apparently this got automatically updated, because I haven't done anything and now the Galaxy button doesn't show any more, and I see it in the options in Adalia. Thank you :)
high rated
avatar
mrkgnao: Anybody here knows the library IDs of Warlords and Warlords II?
The products API won't actually list them as far as I'm aware, but it's 1484514614 for Warlords and 1421600680 for Warlords II Deluxe.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Hmm, I checked WinterSnowfall list, but for some reason his Eye missed the library IDs of the individual games. Let me poke him, and see if he can figure thing out.
Consider me poked :). They're not in the list because they are not listed by the API. I can only pull that many rabbits out of hats, you know.
Post edited May 04, 2020 by WinterSnowfall
avatar
mrkgnao: Anybody here knows the library IDs of Warlords and Warlords II?
avatar
WinterSnowfall: The products API won't actually list them as far as I'm aware, but it's 1484514614 for Warlords and 1421600680 for Warlords II Deluxe.
Thank you. I know their API is blocked, which is why I couldn't deduce their IDs. I guess you own them, which is how you know?
high rated
avatar
mrkgnao: Thank you. I know their API is blocked, which is why I couldn't deduce their IDs. I guess you own them, which is how you know?
You're welcome. I do actually own them, but...
Post edited May 04, 2020 by WinterSnowfall
high rated
avatar
mrkgnao: Thank you. I know their API is blocked, which is why I couldn't deduce their IDs. I guess you own them, which is how you know?
avatar
WinterSnowfall: You're welcome. I do actually own them, but...
Birds are the best.
high rated
avatar
adaliabooks: It's the 2.0 in the id, the dot needs to be escaped with two backslashes or jQuery interprets it as CSS and it doesn't find it.
(I can say this with authority because I had to Google it to figure out why it wasn't working too ;) )
avatar
MarkoH01: Ha, that's what I was suspecting (since it is the only difference). However I did not know how to solve it. Two backslashes on each side you say? I will try this. Thank you :)
No, just two backslashes in front of it, like this;
\\.

Glad it's all working, happy to have been able to sort it out for everyone.
Hi,
Do you think it will be possible to get back the update blue dot for games in the library?
I discovered this problem today and I don't really understand why they removed this function but without it, it will be really difficult for me to understand what update a want to download (I don't really need something like gogrepo...I only download update if there is something new that I really want to get).

Thank you for your work... fixing gog is not an easy job.
high rated
avatar
LiefLayer: Hi,
Do you think it will be possible to get back the update blue dot for games in the library?
I discovered this problem today and I don't really understand why they removed this function but without it, it will be really difficult for me to understand what update a want to download (I don't really need something like gogrepo...I only download update if there is something new that I really want to get).

Thank you for your work... fixing gog is not an easy job.
Unfortunately probably not...
I think it might be possible but you'd basically have to keep track of all updates (which I kind of do anyway for the last updated info) and then keep track of when the user last viewed each game in their library to know whether to mark a game as updated or not.
If I was still properly working on the script it might be possible, but as I mostly only maintain it when needed now I don't really have the time or inclination to work on a new feature like that.
Sorry.