Posted August 30, 2021
I played through whole trilogy recently for the very first time and beforehand read so many bad things about EotB 3 like it's worst crap ever and not worth touching with a +5 Polearm. But honestly I can't see much difference in quality between all 3 games. In fact I'd say I enjoyed 3 slightly more than 2 because fewer frustrating moments like moving holes rooms and frost giants prison in 2.
The only really, really bad moment in 3 was one particular area of Warrior's Tomb with ridiculous respawn when skeletons and beasts were literally materializing around me. I said myself then that if this is normal I give up this game but fortunately it was the only part with such bullshit. After that it was pretty good with decent dungeons, some nice loot unlike in 2, high level mage spells and small improvements like attack from back row (strangely enough my game didn't have advertised "attack all" button?! Maybe it has to be enabled in options but I couldn't find).
All right, portraits are ugly and few puzzles are obscure but that's hardly a reason to bash whole game.
The only really, really bad moment in 3 was one particular area of Warrior's Tomb with ridiculous respawn when skeletons and beasts were literally materializing around me. I said myself then that if this is normal I give up this game but fortunately it was the only part with such bullshit. After that it was pretty good with decent dungeons, some nice loot unlike in 2, high level mage spells and small improvements like attack from back row (strangely enough my game didn't have advertised "attack all" button?! Maybe it has to be enabled in options but I couldn't find).
All right, portraits are ugly and few puzzles are obscure but that's hardly a reason to bash whole game.
Post edited August 30, 2021 by ssling