It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
J Lo: I asked very specific questions. This video does not answer any of them.
avatar
arugulaKhan: Sadly, this thread exists outside of the realm of our meager earth logic.

A link to a youtube video is probably as direct an answer as you're going to get :(
A square mind answer is all i'll probably get after presenting proof beyond words.
But then again, i'm not waiting for you to understand, deep inside you know what i'm saying and you know what that video means to you, to children and to your society.
Sexuality stopped being and issue when humanity understood that it is , at its core, biologically binary.
Sexualizing childrens innocence and confusing them with feminity, is just some kind of devilry.
The attack is mainly on males, why is that? Because males are the ones that can overthrow tyrants by force.
You're being engineered at least for a century, but unfortunately you can't see the forest for the trees and that will cost human society a heavy toll.
avatar
arugulaKhan: Sadly, this thread exists outside of the realm of our meager earth logic.

A link to a youtube video is probably as direct an answer as you're going to get :(
avatar
mamasume111: A square mind answer is all i'll probably get after presenting proof beyond words.
But then again, i'm not waiting for you to understand, deep inside you know what i'm saying and you know what that video means to you, to children and to your society.
Sexuality stopped being and issue when humanity understood that it is , at its core, biologically binary.
Sexualizing childrens innocence and confusing them with feminity, is just some kind of devilry.
The attack is mainly on males, why is that? Because males are the ones that can overthrow tyrants by force.
You're being engineered at least for a century, but unfortunately you can't see the forest for the trees and that will cost human society a heavy toll.
"A square mind answer is all i'll probably get after presenting proof beyond words."

You open this post with insults..."in the absence of argument, starts the vulgarity". A random youtube video isn't proof of anything. Especially without explanation.

"you know what that video means to you, to children and to your society."

I'm afraid you're going to have to spell it out.

"Sexuality stopped being and issue when humanity understood that it is , at its core, biologically binary."

Was there a date for when humanity got together and made this decision? How many people were in attendance? What were their credentials? Do you have source for this?

"Sexualizing childrens innocence and confusing them with feminity, is just some kind of devilry."

This is a Cyberpunk 2077 sub-forum. What does this have to do with the game?

"The attack is mainly on males, why is that? Because males are the ones that can overthrow tyrants by force."

What attack? What tyranny? I'm a guy and I have yet to experience either of these things.

"You're being engineered at least for a century, but unfortunately you can't see the forest for the trees and that will cost human society a heavy toll."

Engineered how? Why for "at least for a century"? Did you make this time frame up or is it based on something? What happens after that? What is your source for this? Why haven't you answered my previous questions? What does this have to do with the game?
avatar
CymTyr: I think you mistook the "interpretation of what a dystopian future would look like" as "this is what CDPR wants to push on everyone"
Hey man, It's been a while. We use to be friends on Xfire and Steam.
avatar
CymTyr: I think you mistook the "interpretation of what a dystopian future would look like" as "this is what CDPR wants to push on everyone"
avatar
Pat Headroom: Hey man, It's been a while. We use to be friends on Xfire and Steam.
What's good? What's your handle? Send me a DM.
avatar
mamasume111: .
How can they make The Witcher and succeed, and then fall flat in this one?
Agreed. Go with Spin-off. Cyberpunk didnt hit the mark, why they wanna keep expanding it? I understand they wanted to expand Witcher 3, because it was 94 metacritic game, but why with Cyberpunk.
Post edited June 24, 2022 by CyberBobber
avatar
mamasume111: .
How can they make The Witcher and succeed, and then fall flat in this one?
avatar
CyberBobber: Agreed. Go with Spin-off. Cyberpunk didnt hit the mark, why they wanna keep expanding it? I understand they wanted to expand Witcher 3, because it was 94 metacritic game, but why with Cyberpunk.
They made a shit load of money on this one, that's why. How? Well, the selling points were Open world, GTA clone, Cyberpunk and Keanu...coming from the company that made The Witcher 3, it showed promise...but...the development time ( red flag), clone of GTA in a cyberpunk world (red flag #2), the lgbtq+ friendly content as a selling point ( red flag #3).

They dupped us and unfortunately, in the marketing busines, morbid curiosity makes any product benefit from the motto " there is no bad publicity"...of course then comes the teeth to the floor, but until then, they made a ton of money which gives them leverage to whatever until it falls, by then, they already used it well.
The stock market doesn't wait for public reviews or awereness, it just keeps on ticking every second. by the time we saw what happened, the money was already flowing. That's why.

Just look at most game developers today...unfinished content, micro transactions, spread content through DLC...but most of the products are full price upfront.
It's our fault really and we know it...fool me once...fool me twice...it's a shame videogames stopped being videogames and began to be political and corporate vehicles...That's why the Good Old Games is such a winning concept, old is gold, time and time again.
Post edited June 24, 2022 by mamasume111
avatar
mamasume111: They made a shit load of money on this one, that's why. How? Well, the selling points were Open world, GTA clone, Cyberpunk and Keanu...coming from the company that made The Witcher 3, it showed promise...but...the development time ( red flag), clone of GTA in a cyberpunk world (red flag #2), the lgbtq+ friendly content as a selling point ( red flag #3).
[...]
Why is everyone comparing anything that have semi open world to GTA? GTA is neither an open world game, like Daggerfall is, nor it was the first game (GTA 3) with OTS view and free city roaming. GTA is just a copy of ATARI's Black Ice / White Noise (which was unfortunately never officially released). And GTA is an action game with just enough plot to justify the shooting, while Cyberbuk's strongest point is actually the plot itself. V's journey, the decisions made, bonds created are what defines the final outcome. Not only in game, but how you receive it. You can hastily shoot you're way through the game, but it will leave you lacking, and that's why there are so many low rating reviews.

Cyberpunk took the unfortunate road the other companies took, but it doesn't force anything on you. It's all you're choices how you like to be viewed, who to romance etc. There are characters who represents some minorities, but they also don't force you to do anything you wouldn't like. Many people complain for not being able to romance Judy if they've chosen certain ... physical traits ... But hey, to be a woman you have to have a pussy, not to be one.

CDPR learned the lesson of developing both the game and game's engine in the same time. That's why they're moving to Unreal engine. But was the delay that much? Compared to Vampire Bloodlines 2? :)