You did not, unless you mean Still too vague, you said nothing about the modability or anything.
astrobryguy made a valid point and you said a vague, not concrete "response" to that.

Like I said, it went over your head.

I beg to differ.

Even with tthis response, you failed to explain how you said something that "flew over our heads"

I went fhrough the whole topic and nowhere in there you said anything about our concerns regarding deep modability, and inflexibility of the Unity engine in that regard.

Also, like I said before, just because one company used the Unity engine for one of its works doesn't make it be-all-end-all engine.

I thought you weren't going to respond any more? Just drop it.

You are only saying that because you failed to explain yourself, but fine.

There is no point in this discussion anymore.

No, he's saying it in order to goad you into responding so he can keep the game going.

I checked the whole conversation and haven't noticed any concrete response to what Hickory's issue was.
I tried really hard to understand his reasoning, so I checked the whole topic multiple times, but haven't noticed anything beyond "it flew over your head" both to me and astrobryguy

That's twice you've said that.

I redacted my previous statement after I noticed that you responded to me with the same vague response as to astrobryguy, so that I could get a more concrete response.

Hickory.

Though experience tells me his whole point is "not Beamdog".

Ah, so he has only issue with the company. Thanks for the clarification.

Wrong.
And here you are again!

*sigh*

.....

whatever