Posted April 13, 2013
kmonster: Kensai is absolutely horrible at low levels (that's during the whole BG1 game and early in BG2), you'll have a melee fighter who can't stand in melee because of horrible armor class, do you really want to abuse a rule oversight (kensai>mage can wear mage robes) so badly that you cripple yourself in the process ?
You don't outsmart the game this way, you outsmart yourself.
Agreed. Personally, I've never understood the fascination powergamers seem to have with Kensai, their bonii to melee only get really useful at high fighter levels and a +3 to hit and damage isn't worth giving up the ability to use shields or armor imo. You don't outsmart the game this way, you outsmart yourself.
If you really want to use a fighter kit then dual to mage at level 9, then use a berserker, their drawbacks are minimal and the immunities you get during rage can be extremely useful , especially in BG 1 when your saves suck.
kmonster: I second the opinion of not dualing Imoen during BG1 if you have another arcane caster but no other thief.
Agreed. The only reason to dual Imoen to mage during BG 1 is if you already have another thief in your party, in which case Imoen can be your best mage. kmonster: My advice: Forget everything you've read about heavily spoilered masochistic powergaming and play for yourself as the game progresses. Have the NPCs you like join your party when you meet them instead of picking them according to a flawed powergaming guide, you can even solo the game.
Agreed. Don't get so hung up on party composition and all the advice given by powergamers. If BG 1 and 2 are easy enough to solo, they're easy enough to win with just about any party, once you get familiar with AD&D rules. Just concentrate on enjoying your playthrough instead on trying to minmax it to death and you'll have a lot more fun imo.