You're lawful good.

Thats literally the only reason why it would be grayed out.

P.s.: Oh and yes it has to be a human of course.

-- Err, information about older system are getting harder to find out with time, not easier.

--- Now I'm confused. I know AD&D, D&D3, and D&D5.

Maybe d20 if you want to count that, though thats really just a very simplified and generalized D&D3.

I dont care about original D&D1 too much, since I never needed it. I only know bits and pieces about it. It was before my time.

D&D3.5 was small random changes and no real improvement, so I ignored it.

I never cared about D&D4, since as far as I'm can tell, thats just odd and weird and not actually D&D. I dont think anyone ever based a D&D game on 4e.

I only have relatively general idea about D&D5 yet, not actually having played BG3 yet. More or less its still very much like D&D3, but it seems more interesting. But I already noticed and was not amused that Fighter gets 4 attacks per round, while Paladin and Ranger only get 2 attacks per round and everybody else only gets one attack per round. I am not sure thats a good idea. Wasnt that exactly one of the things that got better in D&D3 over AD&D ?

Well, I'll probably play BG3 and then I'll find out more about D&D5.

---

P.s.: As always I hate the formatting this forum software does to postings, turning everything into an unreadable wall of text.