ZellSF: In that case, then it's either impossible to reproduce how it was back then, or you can reproduce it just the same with enhanced editions.
I still don't see how the comparison makes sense.
PontoTriplo: It's quite doable "reproduce how it was back then", just download the GOG original editions (patched, but bear with me) and apply the (someone's old cdrom's) old mod version. BAM (except for geocities, but there's wayback machine for that). BG1 with mods, without the BG2 engine (another great fault of the EE, no BG1 with BG1 engine!)
Sure if you burned a CD with the mods you used back in the day, you can get an authentic experience to that, but I think you're being dishonest if you claim the people who say the Enhanced Editions are inauthentic and that the originals with mods are authentic are compromised mostly of people who done that.
Also, EE is totally inauthentic to the original game, but somehow browsing the web through the wayback machine is authentic?
PontoTriplo: " you can reproduce it just the same with enhanced editions.": You most certainly did not play BG1 and BG2 back-to-back to notice just how different they were. BG1 is not BG1EE, not nearly so.
True, but I never claimed it was. I just claimed the modded setup most people play Baldur's Gate with (which is usually even with BG1Tutu) isn't either.
PontoTriplo: These 2 paragraphs above debunk your argument about "impossible to reproduce". I've in fact gotten pretty fond of playing unmodded BG1, just like back in the day, with even the occasional crash to desktop (the computer freeze is much more rare, though, thanks to win NT)
Um, if you're playing unmodded BG1, how are you so sure how authentic the experience of a modded BG1 is?
No one's disputing the authenticity of playing unmodded BG1 (though if you download it via GOG you are forced to install TotSC). I'm not sure why, if you like playing BG1 that way (like I do) you're so eager to debunk my argument where I basically say that's what you need to do to get any level of authenticity?