FreddieFiasco: I love GOG, and these sales are nothing but great for consumers. I'm replying to this only because you bounced off of my comment to make your own, and though I respect your right to have an opinion, I have to defend GOG in the face of your overly harsh reactions. It's a couple sales you missed. Get over it. As you saw, I don't like it either, but they also have great traditional sales. Trying something different doesn't make them villains, and thinking it does makes you look far, far more villainous. Carry on the good work, GOG.
NightDriver: OK. Fair enough. I'll remove your quote from my post so that you're no longer affiliated with my super-villainy. :)
Of course, I don't really see how conveying to GOG my dissatisfaction with sales of this nature makes me a villain. Was my language really "overly harsh"? I'm not so sure. I mean, like most people, I get a little hot under the collar when my time is wasted, but it's not like I hurled a bunch of epithets at them or anything.
But, fine. I'm not looking for an argument. I'll stipulate to your terminology. If wearing the label of villain is the price I have to pay for straightforward honesty, I'm cool with that. I'll consider using milder language in any future expressions of dissatisfaction I direct GOG's way.
BTW, GOG, I will forgive you everything if you bring me all the Goldbox games.
Yeeeeees, including Buck Rogers.
I was actually a tad too harsh in my reply to you, to be honest. However, the whole villain thing wasn't to call you a villain as much as to explain that I felt you were villainizing GOG yet you seemed more like a villain than they did. I didn't mean you're a villain, though :P sorry about that. I guess I just get tired of zealots on the internet getting overly ragey about things that seem rather benign to me.