Gundato: Facts are great. But they aren't "truth". If I were to say "Toyotas accelerate uncontrollably", I would be stating a fact. But that wouldn't be "true", since it is only certain makes and models (anything after 2000 :p). And when you start picking and choosing the facts that you report as "truth", you are applying spin.
Delixe: But I am not the one spinning the facts here, I have only presented them. There is a working crack for AC2 which does not play 2 cutscenes. A person can still play the game from start to finish and a lot of gamers skip cutscenes anyway. Ubisoft are the ones saying there is no crack.
- Ubisoft said the problem was the servers were overloaded.
- Then they said it was hackers.
- Now they are saying it's server overload again.
People just want to know which one it is, why was the system not protected from hackers and most importantly why the system cannot cope with the current levels of demand when Ubisoft themselves said the system was complete, ready and stable.
In business you always factor in the worst possible cases. If you want to market a child car seat you make sure you find the biggest, fattest baby crash test dummy, you put a huge coat on it and load it with weight to make sure it can cope with the worst possible case. Ubisoft needed to prepare for more than half of their customers to actually play the game they bought.
You presented the facts you wanted to present, and then drew conclusions from them. But whatever.
And again, you are arguing semantics. By your definition, the crack works. By the definition of a pirate playing for the story, it doesn't (those two cutscenes). Ubi chose the latter definition, and said there is no "valid crack" (or whatever they actually said). Big difference there.
AC1 had a crack at day negative twelve or something. But Jerusalem was buggered as hell, so it was not a "valid crack".
And no, you don't plan for the worst possible cases. If you do that, you won't make profits. Using the car seat example: If we want to plan for the worst possible case, we better use fancy foam and make it out of the stuff that Black Boxes are built out of. But they ARE built to handle all expected problems. And contrary to popular belief, you can't "expect the unexpected".
Did Ubi drop the ball? Probably. But we don't know by how much. A DDoS mixed with more users than expected could play havoc. And incompetent PR guys doesn't help.