Here is some work of the "experts" from NIST:
Compare their simulation with the real collapse of wtc 7.
Where is the simulation of the steel columns ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EC0U36QWWAA

They quickly sold the steel columns to China ( destruction of the evidence from a crime is A CRIME )

lol. again with the propaganda videos from web-tards.

At least show the full story, rather than a highly disproportionate viewpoint, along with directions to ONLY look at what the web-tard wants, rather than the full story.
http://www.youtube.com/usnistgov#p/f/16/PK_iBYSqEsc

Why is it all critical thinking goes out of the window when it's something you *desperately* want to believe against all evidence to the contrary?? And all other considerations are not considerations? O_o
How old are you? HAVE you finished high-school? Or did you just drop out?

And if you actually ever bothered to stick your head out of your arse, you'd KNOW that samples of the steel supports from WTC1, 2, and 7 and the other damaged buildings were taken before the rest was scrapped. And that tests were performed on those samples.
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.cfm

Care to find the results in those that agree with your ... "hypothesis"?
We'll wait. ;)

Pseudoscience is a claim, belief, or practice which is presented as scientific, but which does not adhere to a valid scientific method, lacks supporting evidence or plausibility, cannot be reliably tested, or otherwise lacks scientific status.[1] Pseudoscience is often characterized by the use of vague, exaggerated or unprovable claims, an over-reliance on confirmation rather than rigorous attempts at refutation, a lack of openness to evaluation by other experts, and a general absence of systematic processes to rationally develop theories.

Distinguishing scientific facts and theories from pseudoscientific beliefs such as those found in astrology, medical quackery, and occult beliefs combined with scientific concepts, is part of science education and scientific literacy.[2]

The term pseudoscience is often considered inherently pejorative, because it suggests that something is being inaccurately or even deceptively portrayed as science.[3] Accordingly, those labeled as practicing or advocating pseudoscience normally dispute the characterization.[3]

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience

You might also be interested in this article..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

You call this work from NIST good ?
eventually etc.
They can't even replicate the collapse of wtc 7 with their simulation.
I have a university degree so no stress. Again ad-hominem how boring.

I call it a lot more credible than your changing the subject and hand-waving, and lies.
I call it good enough that the world's experts don't find fault with it.
I call it good.

It's a "simulation", not a "recreation". You should know the difference if you have indeed a degree.
By the way? Degree in what, and what grade? Hopefully not engineering or construction or materials testing, because you wasted your money if it is. ROFL!

They should take some real experts from Germany and not some "experts" who work for the US government. They can't be objective. No im not an expert in construction or material testing im honest here,

Whut? Why on Earth would they do that? And American experts aren't expert enough? That's ridiculous! O_o
Ok, you've no qualification in the relevant fields, so no expertise...so why are you making opinions, without proof or citation, that are blatantly false?

Either you're really as incompetent in research as you appear, or you're knowingly stating others' lies, and are trolling. I'll let GameRager tell us which. Popliar opinee-on heer, sais hee's a trahhl, too... :rolleyes:

Either way, until you come up with something more concrete than 24 pages of ludicrous statements, hand-waving, or changing the subject, I'm going to let this die the death it deserves...and go make some noodles for luncheon.

It's time to put up, or shut up.

You call this heroin addict from NIST an expert ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA

There are some experts running around to prove them wrong or ? I do not bother with it anyway since the Americans won't do anything. At least the Americans should not give up their weapons at all costs no matter what propaganda the US government puts forth or they will end just like the polish officers in the katyn massacre.

Hey lukipela, it’s also what people do when “experts” are full of shit, you know? Just sayin’ ...

Also, welcome back from the dark side of the rep. Did they have cookies?


@Lone3wolf: I’ll insult you at any time and in any way I like to.

How about providing some examples for my “extraordinary claims”? Where in this thread did I make a directly 9/11 related claim? Huh? Tell us. Surely you could easily show everyone by quoting me, right? What was that? I never said a thing about it and only meant to point out what an immensely self-absorbed asshole you are? Oh, that’s right, now I remember.

Here, so you don’t have to bother looking for it yourself. This is the first thing I wrote in this thread and you are the one who started the whole argument with your inane and superfluous comment:
You are pathetic in your stubbornness. Just give up.

Damn, I'd just popped into this thread to say exactly the same thing, you just beat me to it. (Say it again that is, I'd already said it once on page 5 of this thread.)

It really is pathetic, watching two fundamentalists from two equally wrong sides of the coin going at each other. In your own ways, Slash11 and Lone3wolf, you're both as gullible and naive as each other, parroting crap that you don't truly understand that's been put forward by other faceless cretins with their own whacked or just-plain-evil agendas.

The real shame is that the GOG forums are one of the best places on the internet for a good, civilized chat about whatever. People here are for the most part respectful and polite, compared to a lot of pits that are out there.

For the love of GOG, now that it's obvious to all that you're never going to come to any meaningful conclusion between the two of you, all you're doing is jostling to see who can get the last word in and bumping this thread into eternity. It's incredibly childish, and frankly embarrassing to behold.

Enough!

I did not start ad-hominem attacks and i wanted a meaningful discussion but........

You too, my friend, are a voice of reason. Bravo.

Having said all that, I apologize to anyone whom I may have done wrong. I realize that my rhetoric has been unnecessarily aggressive and vitriolic even if it was supposed to serve a purpose. Forgive me please.