It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
GameRager: Wolf3d doesn't glorify Nazis though.
avatar
Telnet: It does include outlawed material such as insignias and Horst Wessel Lied.
I know, and this also makes me sick to hear. I don't support the ideologies behind such symbols but by denying people's right to use them(albeit in private when playing a game and the like at the very least) it goes against everything I was brought up to believe in.

That'd be like banning(I guess in this case black people like Chapelle) from doing slavery parodies because of the US slavery periods because it was a stain on our past.
Post edited December 01, 2011 by GameRager
avatar
GameRager: That's just it. Making something or some opinion or viewpoint illegal even a vile one such as this(and the acts associated with it) is so anti-freespeech I don't know where to begin. And this is ironic given how Germany is trying to be(I believe) close to the U.S. in terms of freedom for it's people.
It is a very controversial topic among the legal community. Even several judges of the supreme court have openly called those laws unconstitutional. I'm not going to convince you or argue about it here. Books have been written about it, but let me assure you, while there are some really absurd cases sometimes, those law do more good than harm.
avatar
GameRager: That'd be like banning(I guess in this case black people like Chapelle) from doing slavery parodies because of the US slavery periods because it was a stain on our past.
You're own liberty only ranges as far as the right of your fellow man. If it is highly insulting (blackface) it should be illegal.

The Holocaust and slavery are vastly different in scope. And we do make funny movies about Hitler (well, those Jews do ;-P ). Those laws are generally very "focused" in use. They normally only slap them on the bad guys(nor strictly constitutional by itself, but I wont shed a tear)

Edit: Did some edits, sorry.
Post edited December 01, 2011 by SimonG
avatar
SimonG: It is a very controversial topic among the legal community. Even several judges of the supreme court have openly called those laws unconstitutional. I'm not going to convince you or argue about it here. Books have been written about it, but let me assure you, while there are some really absurd cases sometimes, those law do more good than harm.
Those laws could be rewritten to allow the symbols/etc in certain instances where hate/etc is not the main factor in their usage(like in games like Wolf3d/etc) . Blanket laws such as this are just unnecessary and insane imo.
avatar
SimonG: You're own liberty only ranges as far as the right of your fellow man.

The Holocaust and slavery are vastly different in scope. And we do make funny movies about Hitler (well, those Jews do ;-P ). Those laws are generally very "focused" in use. They normally only slap them on the bad guys(nor strictly constitutional by itself, but I wont shed a tear)
Yes I agree, as long as doing so doesn't infringe on everyone';s rights to accomplish such.

Also they are different in scope but still stains on our respective countries. This is the point i;m trying to make here.
Post edited December 01, 2011 by GameRager
avatar
GameRager: snip
Here you go (I don't think this film has seen an english release)
avatar
GameRager: Wolf3d doesn't glorify Nazis though.
avatar
Telnet: It does include outlawed material such as insignias and Horst Wessel Lied.
More than just that there was the issue of shooting dogs and blood. There was an SNES version that was legally distributed in Germany. I'd like to pick up a copy at some point.

IIRC, they swapped rats for dogs, sweat for blood and Staatmeister for Hitler. As well as removing the Horst Wessel Lied and all the swastikas.

It is kind of silly IMHO considering that you're trying to take down the Nazi regime, but I don't make the rules.
Post edited December 01, 2011 by hedwards
I get that your country pokes fun of Hitler. This still doesn't make up for the fact that it lays down the law (just a bit) too harshly in other areas.

(I am not saying neo-nzais shouldn't be punished or those wielding such Nazi symbols and ideals for hate but mainly the game examples I dislike the idea of being censored in such a way.)
avatar
Telnet: It does include outlawed material such as insignias and Horst Wessel Lied.
avatar
hedwards: More than just that there was the issue of shooting dogs and blood. There was an SNES version that was legally distributed in Germany. I'd like to pick up a copy at some point.

IIRC, they swapped rats for dogs, sweat for blood and Stattmeister for Hitler. As well as removing the Horst Wessel Lied and all the swastikas.

It is kind of silly IMHO considering that you're trying to take down the Nazi regime, but I don't make the rules.
You should have seen the changes they made to Return to Castle Wolfenstein. Those were weird.
avatar
GameRager: I get that your country pokes fun of Hitler. This still doesn't make up for the fact that it lays down the law (just a bit) too harshly in other areas.

(I am not saying neo-nzais shouldn't be punished or those wielding such Nazi symbols and ideals for hate but mainly the game examples I dislike the idea of being censored in such a way.)
As I said, it is very controversial. And videogames aren't the most popular topic to begin with in Germany, so, well, we have to live with it.
Post edited December 01, 2011 by SimonG
avatar
SimonG: You should have seen the changes they made to Return to Castle Wolfenstein. Those were weird.
I can't help but think that it's the byproduct of the notorious German bureaucracy in action.

That actually might make it worth a play through. Probably with cheating to get past that stupid stealth sequence.
avatar
GameRager: IMO the German gov't should be kicked in the nuts for trying to sweep their past under the rug via banning Nazi games/references.
Actually the ban on Nazi symbols was enacted by the Allieds immediately after winning WW2.

The German government was never in a position to lift that ban. In the years after the war, lifting that ban would have created a lot of suspicion in the countries that suffered under Nazi Germany. Later, lifting the ban would be a fatally wrong sign for the extremist neo-nazi fringe groups that do still exist in Germany.

This leads to the slightly funny situation that Americans (and others) criticize or even ridicule the Germans for a ban on Nazi symbols that was enacted by their own governments.
*yawn*

Virginia City Bans Confederate Flags From Poles
http://newsone.com/nation/associatedpress3/virginia-city-bans-confederate-flags-from-poles/
avatar
GameRager: IMO the German gov't should be kicked in the nuts for trying to sweep their past under the rug via banning Nazi games/references.
avatar
Psyringe: Actually the ban on Nazi symbols was enacted by the Allieds immediately after winning WW2.

The German government was never in a position to lift that ban. In the years after the war, lifting that ban would have created a lot of suspicion in the countries that suffered under Nazi Germany. Later, lifting the ban would be a fatally wrong sign for the extremist neo-nazi fringe groups that do still exist in Germany.

This leads to the slightly funny situation that Americans (and others) criticize or even ridicule the Germans for a ban on Nazi symbols that was enacted by their own governments.
Why can't they amend the law then to make exceptions? Not drop or cancel out the law perse.

Also: ITT the more you know moment, thanks to our pal Psyringe. :)
Post edited December 01, 2011 by GameRager
avatar
GameRager: Wolf3d doesn't glorify Nazis though.
It's not about glorification but trivialization. National socialism was (and is) a very real and complex phenomenon. Wolfenstein 3D takes the perpetrators of some of the worst atrocities in history and turns them into comic book villains. By using Nazism in trivial contexts such as video games there is a real risk of desensitizing people and turning history into a farce. I'm not generally in favor of censorship, but I can understand that the German government doesn't want to appear lenient on Nazism. They are not sweeping anything under the rug, on the contrary. National socialism is very present in German consciousness and constantly debated ad nauseam. However, using a caricature of national socalism for entertainment is widely viewed as unacceptable.
avatar
GameRager: Wolf3d doesn't glorify Nazis though.
avatar
spindown: It's not about glorification but trivialization. National socialism was (and is) a very real and complex phenomenon. Wolfenstein 3D takes the perpetrators of some of the worst atrocities in history and turns them into comic book villains. By using Nazism in trivial contexts such as video games there is a real risk of desensitizing people and turning history into a farce. I'm not generally in favor of censorship, but I can understand that the German government doesn't want to appear lenient on Nazism. They are not sweeping anything under the rug, on the contrary. National socialism is very present in German consciousness and constantly debated ad nauseam. However, using a caricature of national socalism for entertainment is widely viewed as unacceptable.
Playing Wolf3d is seen as trivializing the holocaust? C'mon............
avatar
GameRager: Wolf3d doesn't glorify Nazis though.
avatar
spindown: It's not about glorification but trivialization. National socialism was (and is) a very real and complex phenomenon. Wolfenstein 3D takes the perpetrators of some of the worst atrocities in history and turns them into comic book villains. By using Nazism in trivial contexts such as video games there is a real risk of desensitizing people and turning history into a farce. I'm not generally in favor of censorship, but I can understand that the German government doesn't want to appear lenient on Nazism. They are not sweeping anything under the rug, on the contrary. National socialism is very present in German consciousness and constantly debated ad nauseam. However, using a caricature of national socalism for entertainment is widely viewed as unacceptable.
very thought-provoking post. +1
avatar
GameRager: Why can't they amend the law then to make exceptions? Not drop or cancel out the law perse.
Well, which kind of amendment would you propose specifically? As far as I can see, any amendment that _partially_ lifts the ban would entail the same problems - with regard to foreign affairs as well as domestically - as lifting the whole ban.

As others noted already, it's a complicated subject. The current situation is a historically grown juridical mess which, despite being a mess, still works rather well in most cases - whereas any attempt of "cleaning it up" incurs substantial risks for very little actual gain.

I can see where you're coming from though. And I'm not convinced that banning symbols of an undesirable ideology is a good way of dealing with it. But I can also see how it ended up being this way and why it'd be risky to change it now.