It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
orcishgamer: Holy crap, yes! People outside our country get it why can't our stupid voters get it? Our prison system is FOR PROFIT. They lobby for 3 strikes laws and ever increasing sentences. We criminalize stuff that should be merely a small fine.
America is not free, not in the least. Some of us here get it, Zee.
avatar
Gundato: Wait, so we are not free because we have criminals?
Or because we enforce the law against white collar crime?
Or are you saying that someone who robs a kwik-e-mart every time he or she gets out of prison should not be given special treatment?
Don't get me wrong, we definitely need to work on rehabilitation. But to say we aren't free because we have criminals?

You need to spend some time researching our incarceration rate. If you can be put in prison for any reason at pretty much any time, you aren't free. That is our system. That and we tend to continue punish people after they've served their sentences, we deny them their civil rights on a regular basis, the ability to get a job, etc. It is terribly sick. We don't enforce laws or punish people in order to protect citizens, we do it for PROFIT.
Other countries do it much differently, Norway is one of the better examples (they won't extradite to the US as their courts have ruled our prisons don't meet the minimum requirements of human decency). Do you really believe we have the highest crime rate in the world? Really? Do you believe that when someone is put in prison in Iran or China it is always a just imprisonment? Then why do you think it is always just here?
Zeewolf:
You are right to not buy it. White collar criminals are a very low portion of our prison population. It's disproportionately made up of minorities (especially black). Your chances of going to prison before age 25 in some states quadruples if you're black. These are not white collar crimes, they are for petty theft or drug charges (usually minor drug possession).
Post edited July 05, 2010 by orcishgamer
Wow, a major case of thread mutation here ...
avatar
Zeewolf: OK, I have only been to America once (Los Angeles), but I came away thoroughly impressed with the country and the people. Everyone I met were friendly, welcoming and helpful. I refuse to believe that the people in USA are more criminal than people elsewhere (generally speaking).

It's because you came as a tourist. There's a stark difference between being in a country for a few days, seeing typical tourist stuff, and actually living, working, and existing in it for a prolonged period. In the first case, you're likely to mostly run across people who are paid to be nice. That being said, I've had nice experiences in the US as well. But always as a tourist.
Post edited July 05, 2010 by stonebro
I like when the cop says that the man had no idea his wife was outside... Yeah, but was it the main problem here?...
avatar
Gundato: Wait, so we are not free because we have criminals?
Or because we enforce the law against white collar crime?
Or are you saying that someone who robs a kwik-e-mart every time he or she gets out of prison should not be given special treatment?
Don't get me wrong, we definitely need to work on rehabilitation. But to say we aren't free because we have criminals?
avatar
orcishgamer: You need to spend some time researching our incarceration rate. If you can be put in prison for any reason at pretty much any time, you aren't free. That is our system. That and we tend to continue punish people after they've served their sentences, we deny them their civil rights on a regular basis, the ability to get a job, etc. It is terribly sick. We don't enforce laws or punish people in order to protect citizens, we do it for PROFIT.
Other countries do it much differently, Norway is one of the better examples (they won't extradite to the US as their courts have ruled our prisons don't meet the minimum requirements of human decency). Do you really believe we have the highest crime rate in the world? Really? Do you believe that when someone is put in prison in Iran or China it is always a just imprisonment? Then why do you think it is always just here?
Zeewolf:
You are right to not buy it. White collar criminals are a very low portion of our prison population. It's disproportionately made up of minorities (especially black). Your chances of going to prison before age 25 in some states quadruples if you're black. These are not white collar crimes, they are for petty theft or drug charges (usually minor drug possession).

Okay, what laws do you disapprove of? I mean, if you can get arrested for "pretty much anything", which laws do you think are morally wrong? Which laws do you think impinge upon your freedom?
As for how we treat felons: I agree, rehabilitation is a huge problem in this country. But are we less free because the government isn't forcing everyone to give a kiddie-rapist a high-paying job? Are we less free because people are allowed to discriminate against felons in favor of people with no criminal record (I know I would rather hire someone who isn't likely to become a repeat offender...).
Don't get me wrong, there are lots of problems with the system. But where are these laws taking away our freedom? Because here is what I am seeing happening:
Person A: "The united States has a huge incarceration rate! They aren't free!"
Person B: "So they aren't free because they have criminals?"
Person A: "No, but obviously they are arrested for everything over there!"
Person B: "Like what?"
Person A: "I don't know. But if they have that many people in prison, they must not be free"
Person B: "So they aren't free because they have criminals?"
avatar
orcishgamer: You need to spend some time researching our incarceration rate. If you can be put in prison for any reason at pretty much any time, you aren't free. That is our system. That and we tend to continue punish people after they've served their sentences, we deny them their civil rights on a regular basis, the ability to get a job, etc. It is terribly sick. We don't enforce laws or punish people in order to protect citizens, we do it for PROFIT.
Other countries do it much differently, Norway is one of the better examples (they won't extradite to the US as their courts have ruled our prisons don't meet the minimum requirements of human decency). Do you really believe we have the highest crime rate in the world? Really? Do you believe that when someone is put in prison in Iran or China it is always a just imprisonment? Then why do you think it is always just here?
Zeewolf:
You are right to not buy it. White collar criminals are a very low portion of our prison population. It's disproportionately made up of minorities (especially black). Your chances of going to prison before age 25 in some states quadruples if you're black. These are not white collar crimes, they are for petty theft or drug charges (usually minor drug possession).
avatar
Gundato: Okay, what laws do you disapprove of? I mean, if you can get arrested for "pretty much anything", which laws do you think are morally wrong? Which laws do you think impinge upon your freedom?
As for how we treat felons: I agree, rehabilitation is a huge problem in this country. But are we less free because the government isn't forcing everyone to give a kiddie-rapist a high-paying job? Are we less free because people are allowed to discriminate against felons in favor of people with no criminal record (I know I would rather hire someone who isn't likely to become a repeat offender...).
Don't get me wrong, there are lots of problems with the system. But where are these laws taking away our freedom? Because here is what I am seeing happening:
Person A: "The united States has a huge incarceration rate! They aren't free!"
Person B: "So they aren't free because they have criminals?"
Person A: "No, but obviously they are arrested for everything over there!"
Person B: "Like what?"
Person A: "I don't know. But if they have that many people in prison, they must not be free"
Person B: "So they aren't free because they have criminals?"

Okay, here's a short list off the top of my head, this doesn't include all the 100 year old laws on the books that have been thrown at people when they couldn't think of anything else:
Drug laws, possession is a stupid thing to incarcerate folks for, alcohol kills more people yearly than every illegal drug combined in the US. The serious addicts need treatment or at least medical care, not incarceration.
Video taping officers, people have been arrested for taping a cops (who were incidentally out of line) for violation of things such as wiretapping statutes.
Possession of a Bony Fish, by treaty with Honduras it is a flipping felony to possess Bony Fish. I know you don't know what one is and probably will never have one, but it's a felony. I bring this up to illustrate how stupid our treaty laws are, there's piles of them.
Obeying officers orders and having the audacity to sit there and get your butt kicked for it (see the Peter Watts case), the jury was kind enough to convict Peter Watts of "obstructing a U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer" instead of nullifying the case.
Admitting you watered your mom's medical marijuana plant when you are 17, and then she let's her medical card expire for one week, you are tried as an adult for endangering a minor.
Sending a booby shot of yourself on your phone from 16 year old girl to 16 year old guy, you are brought up for felony child porn.
Watching your children burn to death and then having the bad luck to get a fire inspector that relies on what experts call "witch craft" to assess the cause of the blaze will get you put to death even after exonerating evidence, by actual experts with actual training, has been presented: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/09/07/090907fa_fact_grann
Oh wait, you don't have to ever have charges brought against you, you can go to Gitmo as an American citizen now, no you may not have an attorney or have your habeus corpus rights. No, your family will likely not be told where you are. The president knows it and thinks it's "okay": http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7092435.ece or any of the other 1000s of articles on the subject.
Geez man, even talking to the cops can get you convicted of something you aren't even guilty of. By all means watch a law professor explain it to you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8z7NC5sgik and then watch an actual cop say "everything he said is true" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08fZQWjDVKE and admit to using all the tactics.
And don't forget the police can charge you with whatever and drop the charges later, usually with impunity, and meanwhile your name is dragged through the mud in local papers (and immortalized online forever) and you pay thousands for legal defense.
We joke about anal rape in our prisons. Seriously, that is unbelievably sick that we let that go on. Would it be okay if one of those guys raped a gal? But no, since you're in prison you probably deserve to be raped too, and in the one place you're very unlikely to be able to find any psychological support afterward.
avatar
orcishgamer: Drug laws, possession is a stupid thing to incarcerate folks for, alcohol kills more people yearly than every illegal drug combined in the US. The serious addicts need treatment or at least medical care, not incarceration.

Maybe. But drug possession and the like are crimes in more than just the US. Hell, I think most "european" countries tend to have it, to varying degrees.
avatar
orcishgamer: Video taping officers, people have been arrested for taping a cops (who were incidentally out of line) for violation of things such as wiretapping statutes.

Do you know more details on the law? I have never heard of a law like this, so I suspect it was actually something else they got arrested for.
avatar
orcishgamer: Possession of a Bony Fish, by treaty with Honduras it is a flipping felony to possess Bony Fish. I know you don't know what one is and probably will never have one, but it's a felony. I bring this up to illustrate how stupid our treaty laws are, there's piles of them.

Pretty much every nation has a few "treaty laws" as it were.
As for this particular one: I don't know all the details (neither do you :p), but I suspect it is also partially due to maintaining the environment and all that other hippie crap.
avatar
orcishgamer: Obeying officers orders and having the audacity to sit there and get your butt kicked for it (see the Peter Watts case), the jury was kind enough to convict Peter Watts of "obstructing a U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer" instead of nullifying the case.

I don't know all the details on this one, but just looking at the first result when you google it (which is INSANELY biased in his favor), he "argued" with a police officer (somehow, I suspect he was not perfectly calm) and refused to get back into his vehicle. At which point, he resisted the officer.
It sounds bad, but think about it this way. Rather than it being a nice old author with an agenda, let's pretend it was a huge person. Let's pretend it was the unholy bastard child of Ahnold, Stallone, Jean Claude Van Damme, and Vin Diesel with training from Jet Li. In other words, a scary bastard. Now, would the cops using force to keep said person from completely ignoring their authority (and possibly being a threat) be a bad thing?
Also, I am pretty sure every single country on the face of the planet has laws regarding people resisting arrest and obstructing an officer.
avatar
orcishgamer: Admitting you watered your mom's medical marijuana plant when you are 17, and then she let's her medical card expire for one week, you are tried as an adult for endangering a minor.

Do you happen to have examples of this?
avatar
orcishgamer: Sending a booby shot of yourself on your phone from 16 year old girl to 16 year old guy, you are brought up for felony child porn.

Age of consent issues. It sucks and is a pretty grey area (wasn't aware they were charging the minors for child porn, thought it was other stuff), but it is just a case of the law being limited. What age do we make the cutoff for child porn? is it no longer child porn after they start looking "hot"? Or do we stick with the age of consent? It is a very complicated question.
avatar
orcishgamer: Watching your children burn to death and then having the bad luck to get a fire inspector that relies on what experts call "witch craft" to assess the cause of the blaze will get you put to death even after exonerating evidence, by actual experts with actual training, has been presented: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/09/07/090907fa_fact_grann

Looking through that, I don't actually see any information pertaining to the case itself, just a crapton of fluff to get us to feel bad for the family. So I went to wiki instead, which was focused more on the investigation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cameron_Todd_Willingham
Yeah, that one looks somewhat botched, but it isn't cut and dry either way.
That being said, Texas is VERY death-penalty happy. That is a big problem that nobody really denies. So I'll let you have this one.
avatar
orcishgamer: Oh wait, you don't have to ever have charges brought against you, you can go to Gitmo as an American citizen now, no you may not have an attorney or have your habeus corpus rights. No, your family will likely not be told where you are. The president knows it and thinks it's "okay": http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7092435.ece or any of the other 1000s of articles on the subject.

Contrary to popular belief, you don't get thrown in gitmo just for being of arab or korean descent. You might get thrown in for knowing Neil Patrick Harris, but some things just can't be avoided :p
That being said, Gitmo isn't a part of those statistics everyone keeps citing. So it can't really be the cause. :p. And I won't really get into that any more beyond that, since it starts to become a question of national security versus never hearing about anything bad happen.
avatar
orcishgamer: Geez man, even talking to the cops can get you convicted of something you aren't even guilty of. By all means watch a law professor explain it to you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8z7NC5sgik and then watch an actual cop say "everything he said is true" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08fZQWjDVKE and admit to using all the tactics.

Gasp, admitting illegal stuff to cops is a bad move?
That being said, you generally don't end up talking to cops in that fashion unless they have reason to suspect you. Admittedly, sometimes that reason is racial/socio-economic bias. But either way, I would like to see any cop in the world not act if someone admitted a crime to them (regardless of if they did it).
avatar
orcishgamer: And don't forget the police can charge you with whatever and drop the charges later, usually with impunity, and meanwhile your name is dragged through the mud in local papers (and immortalized online forever) and you pay thousands for legal defense.

That is actually a problem of the news media, not the police. Blame Nancy Grace and our love of schadenfreude for that one.
Would you prefer the government and police control the news media to prevent this from happening? Would that make us more free? :p
avatar
orcishgamer: We joke about anal rape in our prisons. Seriously, that is unbelievably sick that we let that go on. Would it be okay if one of those guys raped a gal? But no, since you're in prison you probably deserve to be raped too, and in the one place you're very unlikely to be able to find any psychological support afterward.

*cough*prisoners' rights*cough*
And actually, there is a LOT out there to help prisoners cope. Unfortunately, most of them turn it down out of fear. Nobody wants to admit they were raped (it means they are "gay", and most people have the mental maturity of a 4-year old and attribute "gay" to mean "loser"). And often, they are seen as targets because they are "weak". Getting help isn't going to change that. It sucks, but I doubt there is a country in the world with prisons full of happy people.
Seriously though, you raise a lot of semi-valid points. But what there makes us less free? Most of those apply to pretty much any "european" country.
Is the system perfect? No. But are we less free because of our legal system? No. Are we less free because we have a lot of people in prison? No.
Post edited July 05, 2010 by Gundato
avatar
orcishgamer: Drug laws, possession is a stupid thing to incarcerate folks for, alcohol kills more people yearly than every illegal drug combined in the US. The serious addicts need treatment or at least medical care, not incarceration.
avatar
Gundato: Maybe. But drug possession and the like are crimes in more than just the US. Hell, I think most "european" countries tend to have it, to varying degrees.
avatar
orcishgamer: Video taping officers, people have been arrested for taping a cops (who were incidentally out of line) for violation of things such as wiretapping statutes.

Do you know more details on the law? I have never heard of a law like this, so I suspect it was actually something else they got arrested for.
avatar
orcishgamer: Possession of a Bony Fish, by treaty with Honduras it is a flipping felony to possess Bony Fish. I know you don't know what one is and probably will never have one, but it's a felony. I bring this up to illustrate how stupid our treaty laws are, there's piles of them.

Pretty much every nation has a few "treaty laws" as it were.
As for this particular one: I don't know all the details (neither do you :p), but I suspect it is also partially due to maintaining the environment and all that other hippie crap.
avatar
orcishgamer: Obeying officers orders and having the audacity to sit there and get your butt kicked for it (see the Peter Watts case), the jury was kind enough to convict Peter Watts of "obstructing a U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer" instead of nullifying the case.

I don't know all the details on this one, but just looking at the first result when you google it (which is INSANELY biased in his favor), he "argued" with a police officer (somehow, I suspect he was not perfectly calm) and refused to get back into his vehicle. At which point, he resisted the officer.
It sounds bad, but think about it this way. Rather than it being a nice old author with an agenda, let's pretend it was a huge person. Let's pretend it was the unholy bastard child of Ahnold, Stallone, Jean Claude Van Damme, and Vin Diesel with training from Jet Li. In other words, a scary bastard. Now, would the cops using force to keep said person from completely ignoring their authority (and possibly being a threat) be a bad thing?
Also, I am pretty sure every single country on the face of the planet has laws regarding people resisting arrest and obstructing an officer.
avatar
orcishgamer: Admitting you watered your mom's medical marijuana plant when you are 17, and then she let's her medical card expire for one week, you are tried as an adult for endangering a minor.

Do you happen to have examples of this?
avatar
orcishgamer: Sending a booby shot of yourself on your phone from 16 year old girl to 16 year old guy, you are brought up for felony child porn.

Age of consent issues. It sucks and is a pretty grey area (wasn't aware they were charging the minors for child porn, thought it was other stuff), but it is just a case of the law being limited. What age do we make the cutoff for child porn? is it no longer child porn after they start looking "hot"? Or do we stick with the age of consent? It is a very complicated question.
avatar
orcishgamer: Watching your children burn to death and then having the bad luck to get a fire inspector that relies on what experts call "witch craft" to assess the cause of the blaze will get you put to death even after exonerating evidence, by actual experts with actual training, has been presented: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/09/07/090907fa_fact_grann

Looking through that, I don't actually see any information pertaining to the case itself, just a crapton of fluff to get us to feel bad for the family. So I went to wiki instead, which was focused more on the investigation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cameron_Todd_Willingham
Yeah, that one looks somewhat botched, but it isn't cut and dry either way.
That being said, Texas is VERY death-penalty happy. That is a big problem that nobody really denies. So I'll let you have this one.
avatar
orcishgamer: Oh wait, you don't have to ever have charges brought against you, you can go to Gitmo as an American citizen now, no you may not have an attorney or have your habeus corpus rights. No, your family will likely not be told where you are. The president knows it and thinks it's "okay": http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7092435.ece or any of the other 1000s of articles on the subject.

Contrary to popular belief, you don't get thrown in gitmo just for being of arab or korean descent. You might get thrown in for knowing Neil Patrick Harris, but some things just can't be avoided :p
That being said, Gitmo isn't a part of those statistics everyone keeps citing. So it can't really be the cause. :p. And I won't really get into that any more beyond that, since it starts to become a question of national security versus never hearing about anything bad happen.
avatar
orcishgamer: Geez man, even talking to the cops can get you convicted of something you aren't even guilty of. By all means watch a law professor explain it to you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8z7NC5sgik and then watch an actual cop say "everything he said is true" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08fZQWjDVKE and admit to using all the tactics.

Gasp, admitting illegal stuff to cops is a bad move?
That being said, you generally don't end up talking to cops in that fashion unless they have reason to suspect you. Admittedly, sometimes that reason is racial/socio-economic bias. But either way, I would like to see any cop in the world not act if someone admitted a crime to them (regardless of if they did it).
avatar
orcishgamer: And don't forget the police can charge you with whatever and drop the charges later, usually with impunity, and meanwhile your name is dragged through the mud in local papers (and immortalized online forever) and you pay thousands for legal defense.

That is actually a problem of the news media, not the police. Blame Nancy Grace and our love of schadenfreude for that one.
Would you prefer the government and police control the news media to prevent this from happening? Would that make us more free? :p
avatar
orcishgamer: We joke about anal rape in our prisons. Seriously, that is unbelievably sick that we let that go on. Would it be okay if one of those guys raped a gal? But no, since you're in prison you probably deserve to be raped too, and in the one place you're very unlikely to be able to find any psychological support afterward.

*cough*prisoners' rights*cough*
And actually, there is a LOT out there to help prisoners cope. Unfortunately, most of them turn it down out of fear. Nobody wants to admit they were raped (it means they are "gay", and most people have the mental maturity of a 4-year old and attribute "gay" to mean "loser"). And often, they are seen as targets because they are "weak". Getting help isn't going to change that. It sucks, but I doubt there is a country in the world with prisons full of happy people.
Seriously though, you raise a lot of semi-valid points. But what there makes us less free? Most of those apply to pretty much any "european" country.
Is the system perfect? No. But are we less free because of our legal system? No. Are we less free because we have a lot of people in prison? No.

No amount of persuasion is going to convince you. My brother in law sat on the grand jury for one of these. There is video tape of Peter Watts being detained, the you can read accounts of the jurors posted online in which they say he didn't argue with the officers. No, most European countries will not send you to prison for years and years for possessing a minor amount of drugs (unless you were trying to sell it), in fact in a few they'll simply force you to seek treatment.
The point of the Bony Fish story is to convince you that you can't know all the laws you are violating. My point, therefor, stands. There's more than a "few" treaty laws.
You don't know what you're admitting to to a cop might be illegal, man, that is the point. Also, you don't have to have actually done anything wrong, please watch the first half of the "Don't talk to the cops ever" video to understand why.
Again, nothing I can say will convince you, that is the problem with our country, we lose freedoms right and left, but we've all been weened on "the American flag, BOOYAH, I feel so patriotic." It makes me sick. Just wait until you've pissed off a cop and see, even if you were doing nothing wrong.
Irrelevant post. Kindly disregard.
Post edited July 05, 2010 by CymTyr
avatar
CymTyr: I had a nice response to this thread detailing my thoughts, opinions, and facts I've gathered over the years, but you guys seem pretty set in your corners.
Have fun, I'm out of this thread like a button with too much pressure.

I didn't intend to scare you off:)
Honestly I typically only continue arguments with folks like him so less close minded folks have some references to things that they maybe haven't seen before. I have no proof that this actually helps, but some of the links I provided I would want everyone to watch or read.
Nah you didn't scare me, I just don't like discussing politics on the internet. It's all good, Orcish.
avatar
orcishgamer: No amount of persuasion is going to convince you. My brother in law sat on the grand jury for one of these. There is video tape of Peter Watts being detained, the you can read accounts of the jurors posted online in which they say he didn't argue with the officers. No, most European countries will not send you to prison for years and years for possessing a minor amount of drugs (unless you were trying to sell it), in fact in a few they'll simply force you to seek treatment.
The point of the Bony Fish story is to convince you that you can't know all the laws you are violating. My point, therefor, stands. There's more than a "few" treaty laws.
You don't know what you're admitting to to a cop might be illegal, man, that is the point. Also, you don't have to have actually done anything wrong, please watch the first half of the "Don't talk to the cops ever" video to understand why.
Again, nothing I can say will convince you, that is the problem with our country, we lose freedoms right and left, but we've all been weened on "the American flag, BOOYAH, I feel so patriotic." It makes me sick. Just wait until you've pissed off a cop and see, even if you were doing nothing wrong.

Apologies, I based my knowledge of the Watts thing off of the articles online.
But either way: Was he out of his car? Did the police tell him to get back in his car? Did he get back in his car?
If the answer to all three of those is "yes", then he violated the law. Again, imagine if it were a large person as opposed to an old guy. The law isn't a bad one.
As for the drug possession thing: Maybe. But that just becomes a matter of magnitude. Many European countries are much more relaxed about it. We aren't. There are reasons for that (we are pretty close to South America...) and against that (drugs are "fun"). But if your argument is that we are less free because we get in more trouble for heroin, then fine, say it.
That being said: Generally, you don't get sent to prison for possession alone, unless you are a repeat offender. You DO get sent for possession with the intent to traffick. It is somewhat arbitrary as to how that is handled (a matter of how much drugs you have), but so be it.
As for the disparity in enforcement between the US and Europe. That, in many ways, gets back to the earlier gun control debate. We have a different mentality. Europe is MUCH more relaxed about things like alcohol and drugs. We have essentially turned those into a rite of passage in the US (by trying to control them). And that causes a vicious cycle. So they are more dangerous here. Let's just go with the simple example of marijuana, which most people don't consider to be a problem. If you are not a moron, you will get high in the safety of your own home and at parties. If you are a moron, you will get high and drive. That is a problem we have had, so we had to be stricter about it. Once things start to affect others, it becomes a problem.
As for Bony Fish: You are right, there are a lot of laws that people don't know about. But please, how likely are you to be purchasing exotic fish (from reputable sources) and not know about this? Or are you suggesting that cops are running around and trying to trap people into buying Bony Fish on the street? :p
And again, how often do you talk to cops? Do you just walk up to a cop on the street and start talking about your personal life? Probably not. If a cop is interrogating you, then it is because you were a witness to something, or a suspect to something.
And, in those cases, I actually agree. I tell cops the bare minimum. And I sure as hell don't volunteer any information (unless I felt it was pertinent to the incident at hand, such as "I am pretty sure I saw her talking on her cell phone before she got into that accident"). I didn't feel the need to talk to the cops about my collection of exotic and illegal fish :p. I DID joke with a cop about smurf porn once, but that was a very special situation (and I actually knew the cop). Probably not all that smart, but it was funny :p
It is always possible to incriminate yourself. So if you are really scared, just plead the fifth by default. Worst case scenario, you don't vollunteer useful information and someone gets away with something they wouldn't have otherwise (thus increasing our freedom statistic :p). But that being said, I think we can both agree that it usually ends up being morons like OJ who admit to assaulting people with illegal firearms or idiot stoners who say "I was busy getting high when...". I sincerely doubt anyone has ever gotten arrested for owning a Bony Fish while saying hello to a cop on the street (okay, actually, I am pretty sure someone did. But I suspect the person was an idiot :p).
As for the very last part: Wow, I love how everyone who doesn't think like you is an idiot who makes you sick :p. Would the country be freer if we were all forced to be indoctrinated in your beliefs? :p Like I keep saying, I am not saying the system is without problems. If you want to say that things like The Patriot Act make us less free, feel free (although, I would STRONGLY advise you to actually research how this is handled in many other countries...). That is the great thing about this country, people are allowed to question their government. But if you are going to argue that we are less free because we have prisons, please get specific examples. You actually did this, but most of yours tend to be more toward the "the government is out to get us" angle and don't actually explain the high prisoner percentage (unless we are to believe that everyone is getting arrested at borders, watering plants, and owning Bony Fish :p)
I will leave you with the following, which I usually reserve for people who freak out about internet security with regard to the patriot act, but I think still applies here:
Your mother lied to you. You aren't special. You are just like everybody else. So why do you think the cops/government are going to go out of their way to frame you for an incredibly esoteric crime and then ship you off to Gitmo?
Food for thought :p
avatar
orcishgamer: No amount of persuasion is going to convince you. My brother in law sat on the grand jury for one of these. There is video tape of Peter Watts being detained, the you can read accounts of the jurors posted online in which they say he didn't argue with the officers. No, most European countries will not send you to prison for years and years for possessing a minor amount of drugs (unless you were trying to sell it), in fact in a few they'll simply force you to seek treatment.
The point of the Bony Fish story is to convince you that you can't know all the laws you are violating. My point, therefor, stands. There's more than a "few" treaty laws.
You don't know what you're admitting to to a cop might be illegal, man, that is the point. Also, you don't have to have actually done anything wrong, please watch the first half of the "Don't talk to the cops ever" video to understand why.
Again, nothing I can say will convince you, that is the problem with our country, we lose freedoms right and left, but we've all been weened on "the American flag, BOOYAH, I feel so patriotic." It makes me sick. Just wait until you've pissed off a cop and see, even if you were doing nothing wrong.
avatar
Gundato: Apologies, I based my knowledge of the Watts thing off of the articles online.
But either way: Was he out of his car? Did the police tell him to get back in his car? Did he get back in his car?
If the answer to all three of those is "yes", then he violated the law. Again, imagine if it were a large person as opposed to an old guy. The law isn't a bad one.
As for the drug possession thing: Maybe. But that just becomes a matter of magnitude. Many European countries are much more relaxed about it. We aren't. There are reasons for that (we are pretty close to South America...) and against that (drugs are "fun"). But if your argument is that we are less free because we get in more trouble for heroin, then fine, say it.
That being said: Generally, you don't get sent to prison for possession alone, unless you are a repeat offender. You DO get sent for possession with the intent to traffick. It is somewhat arbitrary as to how that is handled (a matter of how much drugs you have), but so be it.
As for the disparity in enforcement between the US and Europe. That, in many ways, gets back to the earlier gun control debate. We have a different mentality. Europe is MUCH more relaxed about things like alcohol and drugs. We have essentially turned those into a rite of passage in the US (by trying to control them). And that causes a vicious cycle. So they are more dangerous here. Let's just go with the simple example of marijuana, which most people don't consider to be a problem. If you are not a moron, you will get high in the safety of your own home and at parties. If you are a moron, you will get high and drive. That is a problem we have had, so we had to be stricter about it. Once things start to affect others, it becomes a problem.
As for Bony Fish: You are right, there are a lot of laws that people don't know about. But please, how likely are you to be purchasing exotic fish (from reputable sources) and not know about this? Or are you suggesting that cops are running around and trying to trap people into buying Bony Fish on the street? :p
And again, how often do you talk to cops? Do you just walk up to a cop on the street and start talking about your personal life? Probably not. If a cop is interrogating you, then it is because you were a witness to something, or a suspect to something.
And, in those cases, I actually agree. I tell cops the bare minimum. And I sure as hell don't volunteer any information (unless I felt it was pertinent to the incident at hand, such as "I am pretty sure I saw her talking on her cell phone before she got into that accident"). I didn't feel the need to talk to the cops about my collection of exotic and illegal fish :p. I DID joke with a cop about smurf porn once, but that was a very special situation (and I actually knew the cop). Probably not all that smart, but it was funny :p
It is always possible to incriminate yourself. So if you are really scared, just plead the fifth by default. Worst case scenario, you don't vollunteer useful information and someone gets away with something they wouldn't have otherwise (thus increasing our freedom statistic :p). But that being said, I think we can both agree that it usually ends up being morons like OJ who admit to assaulting people with illegal firearms or idiot stoners who say "I was busy getting high when...". I sincerely doubt anyone has ever gotten arrested for owning a Bony Fish while saying hello to a cop on the street (okay, actually, I am pretty sure someone did. But I suspect the person was an idiot :p).
As for the very last part: Wow, I love how everyone who doesn't think like you is an idiot who makes you sick :p. Would the country be freer if we were all forced to be indoctrinated in your beliefs? :p Like I keep saying, I am not saying the system is without problems. If you want to say that things like The Patriot Act make us less free, feel free (although, I would STRONGLY advise you to actually research how this is handled in many other countries...). That is the great thing about this country, people are allowed to question their government. But if you are going to argue that we are less free because we have prisons, please get specific examples. You actually did this, but most of yours tend to be more toward the "the government is out to get us" angle and don't actually explain the high prisoner percentage (unless we are to believe that everyone is getting arrested at borders, watering plants, and owning Bony Fish :p)
I will leave you with the following, which I usually reserve for people who freak out about internet security with regard to the patriot act, but I think still applies here:
Your mother lied to you. You aren't special. You are just like everybody else. So why do you think the cops/government are going to go out of their way to frame you for an incredibly esoteric crime and then ship you off to Gitmo?
Food for thought :p

None of the people to which I referred were really "special" either, bad stuff happened to them, in some cases really bad stuff.
avatar
orcishgamer: None of the people to which I referred were really "special" either, bad stuff happened to them, in some cases really bad stuff.

And they weren't singled out.
The writer was out of his vehicle and refusing to obey an officer of the law. Maybe he shouldn't have ever been stopped, but until "the bad guys" stop forgetting their black hats at the dry cleaners, there are going to be false positives. And once he refused to obey an officer of the law making reasonable requests, he became a 'bad guy".
The dude whose house got burned down got screwed, plain and simple. Forensics is not perfect.
Those are the ones you specifically mentioned. Both had bad things happen to them, no doubt about that. But their rights weren't violated and their freedoms weren't taken away.
avatar
Gundato: The writer was out of his vehicle and refusing to obey an officer of the law. Maybe he shouldn't have ever been stopped, but until "the bad guys" stop forgetting their black hats at the dry cleaners, there are going to be false positives. And once he refused to obey an officer of the law making reasonable requests, he became a 'bad guy".

An officer of the law is not "the law". Their requests, whether "reasonable" or not, do not have to be obeyed. They can arrest you, and it is illegal to resist arrest. But they don't have the right to beat you up for failing to "obey a request".
avatar
Gundato: The writer was out of his vehicle and refusing to obey an officer of the law. Maybe he shouldn't have ever been stopped, but until "the bad guys" stop forgetting their black hats at the dry cleaners, there are going to be false positives. And once he refused to obey an officer of the law making reasonable requests, he became a 'bad guy".
avatar
kalirion: An officer of the law is not "the law". Their requests, whether "reasonable" or not, do not have to be obeyed. They can arrest you, and it is illegal to resist arrest. But they don't have the right to beat you up for failing to "obey a request".

Let's pretend you are a cop for a moment.
You are patrolling around when you see some guy holding up a Kwik-E-Mart. Fortunately, Apu is used to this, so he didn't really bother to resist. So the guy is walking out.
You yell "Stop, stealing is wrong, don'tcha know?"
He gives you the finger and keeps walking.
In the world YOU just described, you can't do anything.
Want a less obviously guilty one?
You are a cop. A shooting has just occurred. You see someone leaving the scene, you tell them not to. Now, you can't arrest them yet (well, you can, but it is a grey area where you might get sued), because you don't have enough evidence to suspect them. But you aren't going to let someone walk away. So you get in their way. They continue to resist you.
At this point, pretty much ANYTHING you do is going to count as 'beating someone up". Whether you punch them out (and probably lose your badge) or use enough force to cuff them temporarily.
It is a very grey area between police brutality and doing one's job (especially when the media gets involved). But police officers are fully within their rights to restrain someone who is obstructing an investigation or posing a threat. And this guy was posing a threat if he was out of his car and refusing to get back in. Cops want you in your car for a reason: it keeps you in sight, you are more likely to be relaxed, and it is harder to attack them.