It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Miaghstir: Is there anywhere on this site we can add "mac support" on a wishlist? It doesn't really fit in the add-this-game wishlist.

http://www.gog.com/en/forum/general/gog_039_s_features_wish_list
The features wishlist is probably the spot for that request.
I doubt that they could simply repackage the games with boxer for the mac, there's probably licence fees for using it commercially and it may also qualify as changing the game's code (not sure how it works, never used it before)
avatar
Miaghstir: Is there anywhere on this site we can add "mac support" on a wishlist? It doesn't really fit in the add-this-game wishlist.
avatar
Aliasalpha: http://www.gog.com/en/forum/general/gog_039_s_features_wish_list
The features wishlist is probably the spot for that request.
I doubt that they could simply repackage the games with boxer for the mac, there's probably licence fees for using it commercially and it may also qualify as changing the game's code (not sure how it works, never used it before)

In its core, Boxer still uses DOSBox as its engine. It's just digs it so deep under ground so you as a user don't have to worry about it. So no, there's no need to modify any code of the game. I've gone through all of my old PC games and so far only Fade 2 Black hasn't worked. But all Lucasarts, Sierra, Revolution and so on has worked without any code changing.
But you may have a point that it might require additional license fees. But then again, have the companies agreed on selling the games here for a buck or two, I don't see why they wouldn't want further exposure on Mac as well. The Boxer software is freeware.
Oh well if its freeware and has no real issues then it'd be a really good addition
this is my opinion on mac.
Attachments:
asdf.jpg (72 Kb)
avatar
jeaz: As for DOS games, forget about DOSBox, use Boxer. It makes DOSBox look as primitive as the games it tries to run. A real Gem. It's quick and easy in the natural Mac way.
Really, you'll never look back.
The beauty with Boxer is that it packages your games once they are installed into typical OSX applications. Meaning, GoG could quite easily sell ready to install DMGs (sort of setup files for Mac if some PC user wonders) for Boxer use. Just drag and drop and run, no setup needed. (well, it would need Boxer installed, but it's a install and forget sort of app)

That sounds like a beautiful thing, really. I'm checking it out right now!!!
Well, once it downloads, anyway.
BJ
avatar
Weclock: this is my opinion on mac.

You can change your opinion, since Mac come with 2 buttons (and a multi-directionnal wheel) mouse, for some years now. ;)
avatar
Weclock: this is my opinion on mac.
avatar
DarthKaal: You can change your opinion, since Mac come with 2 buttons (and a multi-directionnal wheel) mouse, for some years now. ;)
I have a macbook pro, and it's built in mouse uses only one button. I use an external DELL mouse. TY VRY MCH
avatar
Weclock: this is my opinion on mac.

Wow. That is epic! *saves*
avatar
Weclock: I have a macbook pro, and it's built in mouse uses only one button. I use an external DELL mouse. TY VRY MCH

The situation is made even worse if you try to dual-boot because Windows doesn't support Option-clicking for right click (although I think Apple's Boot Camp drivers may add this functionality).
avatar
Weclock: this is my opinion on mac.
avatar
Arkose: Wow. That is epic! *saves*
avatar
Weclock: I have a macbook pro, and it's built in mouse uses only one button. I use an external DELL mouse. TY VRY MCH

The situation is made even worse if you try to dual-boot because Windows doesn't support Option-clicking for right click (although I think Apple's Boot Camp drivers may add this functionality).
yeah, if you hold two fingers on the touch pad while clicking the button, it considers it a right click.
avatar
Aliasalpha: Oh well if its freeware and has no real issues then it'd be a really good addition

Yes, it would however only be valid for the DOS-games as there still no really good and dependable emulator for WIndows. Not as easily packaged either.
Just for fun, I did a package of Beneath a Steel Sky and it's just as easy as I expected. Just drag n' drop install. Don't dare to distribute it though as, although it been released for free by Revolution, there may still be legal limitations to distribution.
I'm the developer of Boxer, and thought I'd weigh in with my thoughts on bundling commercial DOS games for distribution to Macs.
Firstly, Boxer is a much better starting-point for this than DOSBox, for reasons that will hopefully be apparent to anyone who gives Boxer 0.9 a try.
That said, Boxer's game package format is not an appropriate way for GOG to release games, were they to add Mac support. A game package is inert and unusable until Boxer is present on the user's system, and it's currently not possible to cleanly bundle Boxer with a game (like GOG does now with DOSBox) without Boxer creating extraneous support folders (which are irrelevant to a single-game emulation scenario) and generally acting like a separate application.
The ideal way to release a DOS game for Mac would be a DMG enclosing a self-contained OS X .app, bearing the name and box art of that game. This .app would simply be a customised, stripped-down version of the Boxer application itself, with the game files stored inside the application bundle. This version would need to replace the Boxer branding with that of the game, and discard all of Boxer's extra functionality to focus only on emulating that particular game.
Such a version of Boxer does not yet exist. But, it would be quite practical for me to make it exist were there a demand, and I am very happy to work with any company that wants such a thing to exist for their own distributions. So, should GOG ever change its policy on Mac support, please get in touch.
avatar
Viggles: I'm the developer of Boxer, and thought I'd weigh in with my thoughts on bundling commercial DOS games for distribution to Macs.
Firstly, Boxer is a much better starting-point for this than DOSBox, for reasons that will hopefully be apparent to anyone who gives Boxer 0.9 a try.
That said, Boxer's game package format is not an appropriate way for GOG to release games, were they to add Mac support. A game package is inert and unusable until Boxer is present on the user's system, and it's currently not possible to cleanly bundle Boxer with a game (like GOG does now with DOSBox) without Boxer creating extraneous support folders (which are irrelevant to a single-game emulation scenario) and generally acting like a separate application.
The ideal way to release a DOS game for Mac would be a DMG enclosing a self-contained OS X .app, bearing the name and box art of that game. This .app would simply be a customised, stripped-down version of the Boxer application itself, with the game files stored inside the application bundle. This version would need to replace the Boxer branding with that of the game, and discard all of Boxer's extra functionality to focus only on emulating that particular game.
Such a version of Boxer does not yet exist. But, it would be quite practical for me to make it exist were there a demand, and I am very happy to work with any company that wants such a thing to exist for their own distributions. So, should GOG ever change its policy on Mac support, please get in touch.

Welcome Viggles! Glad to have you on board!
Honestly, I don't think it'd be that hard to make people download Boxer onto their Macs if they didn't run that on their systems already. Maybe make that as part of a *.DMG file where you can install Boxer as well when you first install a game from GOG if you don't have Boxer on your system already.
BTW, I've been playing with the new Boxer build. Man, that is a major improvement! Great job!
And since I have Boxer already, I'd love to have regular Boxer *.app files of the DOS games on GOG as part of my DOS Games folder! That might be a perfect way to play with Teenagent and any other DOS games (like the first Oddworld, the Fallout games, etc.) that I'd get on GOG.
I'm happy with the Windows games however they choose to do it, however; whether they work with Apple & Microsoft to come up with an emulation layer for GOG.com apps or whether they port it over themselves, I really don't care how, I'd love to have full Mac support, but that's a pipe dream for now (although they might make that sort of announcement at E3...).
BJ
Why is this thread bumped, when the last post was on the 5th of April? What the heck is going on?
avatar
michaelleung: Why is this thread bumped, when the last post was on the 5th of April? What the heck is going on?

Well i don't know why you bumped it, but since you did, I'll add my $.02 worth.
I went to Newegg and found Windows OEM discs as cheap as $89.99 (XP Home). I then went to my local craigslist and found used pcs that could play any game that GOG currently sells. They're in the $50 - $100 range. You can then find a used video card in the $25 - $50 range. So from $75 - $150 you could just get a Windows pc to play your games on and not worry about Boot Camp, adding another OS or emulation.
Since I'm a pc gamer, I just skipped buying the mac part and spent my money on a gaming PC! ;)
seeing as this was bumped....
i wouldnt mind seeing some old mac games on here.
my old powerpc based mac mini doesnt get used much but it would more if there were some games i could run on it.