It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Hollywood gets tech just fine, the vast majority of the industry runs on some of the best tech that exists and there's no way anybody can be a director or editor without having something resembling tech-oriented interests.

The issue is that things are altered to either make the storytelling faster, more interesting, or easier for the audience. The easiest example for this is hacking... of course hacking doesn't work like it does in movies, but the way hacking does work would be boring as hell on camera. Now granted, Hackers goes about trying to solve this in the dumbest way possible, but it's not because nobody involved "got" computers, it's because they tried to solve a fundamental issue and cocked it up along the way.
avatar
lukipela: They were putting C4 in the computers.
That is exactly 4,721.927 times more retarded than magic combustion.
*FACT* when ever you see something about the movie hackers... you are compelled to find a copy and watch it again.

(moves Hackers to #1 on his Netflix while typing this)
avatar
El_Caz: I love it when in the cop shows they have a blurry pixelated shot from a security camera, and the cop asks the tech guy to clean it up and voila! All the giant pixels are gone and a number or a name can be read in perfect detail.
This is the classic example I always use to show the stupidity of movies and TV.
avatar
sethsez: Hollywood gets tech just fine, the vast majority of the industry runs on some of the best tech that exists and there's no way anybody can be a director or editor without having something resembling tech-oriented interests.

The issue is that things are altered to either make the storytelling faster, more interesting, or easier for the audience. The easiest example for this is hacking... of course hacking doesn't work like it does in movies, but the way hacking does work would be boring as hell on camera. Now granted, Hackers goes about trying to solve this in the dumbest way possible, but it's not because nobody involved "got" computers, it's because they tried to solve a fundamental issue and cocked it up along the way.
No, special effects people may work with highly sophisticated tech equipment, but the garden variety cop show writers and actors don't, they barely know get the video games and the twitters. I think most of the time it's the shows shoehorning tech in their movies and such, because they think it'll make it more "up-to-date" and interesting to the audience, when in reality it does the opposite. It makes much much more dated.
avatar
Starkrun: *FACT* when ever you see something about the movie hackers... you are compelled to find a copy and watch it again.

(moves Hackers to #1 on his Netflix while typing this)
Bullshit, admit it, you just wanna see Angelina's boobz again.
avatar
Kabuto: Even if it were 2011, how the hell can you send a command to capsize a boat?
avatar
nondeplumage: Hey, the horrible, horrible, horrrrrrrible shitty Live Free or Die Hard proved you could send a program to blow up someone from their computer.

Because everything can be accessed by the Internet. Even the Sun. But especially your mom.
My favorite was when someone demands "the" list of all the hackers in the country immediately. Is there such list?
avatar
drmlessgames: My favorite was when someone demands "the" list of all the hackers in the country immediately. Is there such list?
There's a database of criminals. You could probably make a list of every single one based on whether they have "teh 1337 haxxorz" somewhere on their list of crimes. Of course, since we're talking about real life, that'd mean a list from every unconnected database from every law place ever, gotten by people on government salary. So...no. Not really. Not immediately in any sense of the word.
The Second Life chase scene is truly horrible and hilarious at the same time. Seriously, these writers have to use the net at some point of their lives. Don't they know you can just disconnect at will instead of running away in a VIRTUAL environment?? Sheesh.
avatar
JudasIscariot: The Second Life chase scene is truly horrible and hilarious at the same time. Seriously, these writers have to use the net at some point of their lives. Don't they know you can just disconnect at will instead of running away in a VIRTUAL environment?? Sheesh.
Well it is bad, but maybe(stretch of imagination here but bear with me....) maybe the other guy was seeing if the cops could "catch" him in cyberspace via a test of sorts so that he could be deemed worthy of cooperation with said fox guy. Just a thought.
Don't you dare try to believe the people writing these shit shows have an ounce of imagination or intelligence whatsoever.
avatar
nondeplumage: Don't you dare try to believe the people writing these shit shows have an ounce of imagination or intelligence whatsoever.
It's entertainment......not shakespeare. To try to blame it for not being Cannes level material is kinda dumb.
avatar
GameRager: It's entertainment......not shakespeare. To try to blame it for not being Cannes level material is kinda dumb.
this is not about it not being good or sophisticated. This is about it showing a fundamental lack of understanding of a highly relevant part of our reality.
And that's funny.
avatar
nondeplumage: That is exactly 4,721.927 times more retarded than magic combustion.
avatar
lukipela: Not really. It is pretty well explained.

Maybe you should get off your "omg fiction is so fake" horse?
Some people just expect movies to be perfect I guess.......with me, I try to suspend my disbelief until the show is over, and just enjoy the film(s) for entertainment's sake....even if they are filled with inaccuracies I can point out. Hell, I even laugh at them sometimes ala MST3K style like others in here do.
avatar
sethsez: Hollywood gets tech just fine, the vast majority of the industry runs on some of the best tech that exists and there's no way anybody can be a director or editor without having something resembling tech-oriented interests.

The issue is that things are altered to either make the storytelling faster, more interesting, or easier for the audience. The easiest example for this is hacking... of course hacking doesn't work like it does in movies, but the way hacking does work would be boring as hell on camera. Now granted, Hackers goes about trying to solve this in the dumbest way possible, but it's not because nobody involved "got" computers, it's because they tried to solve a fundamental issue and cocked it up along the way.
avatar
drmlessgames: No, special effects people may work with highly sophisticated tech equipment, but the garden variety cop show writers and actors don't, they barely know get the video games and the twitters. I think most of the time it's the shows shoehorning tech in their movies and such, because they think it'll make it more "up-to-date" and interesting to the audience, when in reality it does the opposite. It makes much much more dated.
Cop shows are an interesting exception mostly because writers tend to be on them VERY long term and new blood doesn't tend to come in often.

That said, even there the writers still know more than you think they do. The thing is, their demographics tend to be pretty damn old compared to most of TV, so most technology is dumbed down to the level of magic plot devices to make sure grandma follows what's going on while still giving things a veneer of being modern (and of course, this is also done so they can easily wrap up a seemingly-impossible case in an hour).

"Zoom, enhance" doesn't exist because writers think it actually happens (I'd put money on them making fun of it long before most people even noticed it was a trend... it is their job, after all, and people in the industry tend to be VERY sensitive to these kind of trends), it exists because it's a convenient way to write themselves out of a corner and audiences are willing to just grit their teeth and accept it. Believe me, it's pretty much impossible to be a writer and not be aware that "zoom enhance" is a trope rather than an actual thing that exists in real life, not because of any technical knowledge but because industry tropes and feedback from viewers are pretty much completely impossible to avoid at that level.

I mean, nobody who writes screenplays actually thinks two people typing on a keyboard will get ANYTHING done (using a keyboard is 99% of their daily job, after all), and yet there it is in NCIS! It's not because the writer or director thinks this is how computers work, it's because someone thought it made the scene more exciting and underestimated how much the audience would care.

Now, granted, you do get some goof ups that are due to a writer or director not getting a tech concept. But all of the really blatant, simple computer errors that pop up which anybody who's ever touch a PC would know is wrong? There's almost always a different reason behind those.