It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
...and I've played a handful missions at most, I probably got sidetracked by some other shiny. Oh well, my CE will have to wait for another time to be continued.
avatar
brendano: Quick question, if you purchase StarCraft II through Battle.Net, how much does it go for? I've put off trying this title out for far too long.
$60 for you NA guys, I think. You'll most likely find it cheaper retail.
happy birthday
avatar
KavazovAngel: $60 for you NA guys, I think. You'll most likely find it cheaper retail.
The cheapest I've ever seen it was at $50, and that was months ago. Right now $60 is the one and only price that Starcraft 2 is selling for (in Canada at least).
avatar
KavazovAngel: $60 for you NA guys, I think. You'll most likely find it cheaper retail.
avatar
GoJays2025: The cheapest I've ever seen it was at $50, and that was months ago. Right now $60 is the one and only price that Starcraft 2 is selling for (in Canada at least).
I've seen it a few times at $50 also. Even Amazon.com where their prices are usually much lower than retail in the USA still list it at $50. Meanwhile great games like Portal 2 have been on sale retail for $29.99 at several stores in the USA and Canada. What gives?
Post edited July 27, 2011 by Kabuto
It's the Nintendo factor.

They won't lower the price on their cashcow.
avatar
Foxhack: It's the Nintendo factor.

They won't lower the price on their cashcow.
1000 times this.

However, you can argue that Blizzard is constantly patching and updating their games, considering even Diablo 2 got a new patch not too long ago, and most developers forget about the games 2 months after release, unless there's an expansion coming.
They were still selling Diablo and Warcraft 3 battlechests for $20-30 years after most games would have hit the bottom of the bargain bin. But why not? Enough people must have been buying.
avatar
Foxhack: It's the Nintendo factor.

They won't lower the price on their cashcow.
avatar
Tizzysawr: 1000 times this.

However, you can argue that Blizzard is constantly patching and updating their games, considering even Diablo 2 got a new patch not too long ago, and most developers forget about the games 2 months after release, unless there's an expansion coming.
So does Valve. When is the source engine not updated (thankfully I uncehck update on all my steam games).

As for warchests, it's main game + expansions + guides + still regular updates + active multiplayer. That's pretty good value even at $20-$30.
I know this is a little late but I still have a guest pass from my boxed copy that someone can have. PM if you want to try it out for 7hour/14 days - whichever comes first. PM me if your interested. First come first serve!
avatar
zach2588: I know this is a little late but I still have a guest pass from my boxed copy that someone can have. PM if you want to try it out for 7hour/14 days - whichever comes first. PM me if your interested. First come first serve!
Note: It should also give you the ability to play the full single player experience in guest mode.
I started season 3, lost to a silver player in 1v1 and ranked gold. -_-
i see that some of the same people that can't stop raging about Steam apparently have no problem with the fact that StarCraft 2 requires you to register with Blizzard's own digital platform - Battle.net - and activate your copy. interesting...
avatar
Fred_DM: i see that some of the same people that can't stop raging about Steam apparently have no problem with the fact that StarCraft 2 requires you to register with Blizzard's own digital platform - Battle.net - and activate your copy. interesting...
I dunno, maybe because it doesn't require a client to be constantly running, doesn't leak memory, there is 24/7 phone / email / twitter support available, they don't suspend / ban your account if a transaction fails...

... just saying, you know, like, maybe that is the case.

EDIT: Oh, and probably because they don't scan my system for whatever software I have running, and then publish the results online.
Post edited July 28, 2011 by KavazovAngel
avatar
Fred_DM: i see that some of the same people that can't stop raging about Steam apparently have no problem with the fact that StarCraft 2 requires you to register with Blizzard's own digital platform - Battle.net - and activate your copy. interesting...
avatar
KavazovAngel: I dunno, maybe because it doesn't require a client to be constantly running, doesn't leak memory, there is 24/7 phone / email / twitter support available, they don't suspend / ban your account if a transaction fails...

... just saying, you know, like, maybe that is the case.

EDIT: Oh, and probably because they don't scan my system for whatever software I have running, and then publish the results online.
Never heard of Warden, uh?