Amerika-p4l: Yet another internet tough guy. I'm being unreasonable yet there is a lot of very unbiased and reasonable people here who appear to understand.
You've done a pretty good job alienating them by now. It's also quite telling that you label people who disagree with you as "trolls" (to your thread) and "devoted fans" (to GOG), while you label people who don't totally disagree with you (I didn't see any actual agreement to speak of) as "reasonable" and "unbiased". That's exactly the thing I addressed in my previous post. You readily assume that people are just blind GOG fanboys instead of questioning your position. You readily assume that GOG has no integrity instead of questioning your position. And so on. That's the pattern that caught my attention.
Amerika-p4l: You simply want to badger somebody because you perceive them as attacking something you believe in. It's a natural human reaction even if it is irrational, emotionally insipid and illogical. Your response has nothing to do with "reality" and everything to do with your bias.
And again. :) You readily assume that I just want to "badger" you. You readily assume that I can't stand attacks on GOG (as if being a satisfied customer made me blind to the shortcomings that their service of course has). It's a convenient assumption for you to make, but that doesn't make it true.
Amerika-p4l: Exactly what did I assume?
Re-read your own posts, you used the word "assumed" continually throughout. I also gave a couple of other examples.
Amerika-p4l: Others get it here...why don't you? Oh wait, that's because you are a sheep who has little going for their intellect outside of mob mentality.
I'll let that stand, these insults speak well for themselves. I don't see how much good your throwing animal names at me is doing for any argument you might have had, though.
Amerika-p4l: Other rational people have easily outlined and paraphrased my issue and for the most part agreed that they were indeed issues.
At this point I can only suggest to re-read the thread.