It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
asb: 1 definite and 2 in progress out of MS, Square Enix, EA, LucasArts and Take Two means that if we assume all 3 go through then at least one of them has to be MS, EA or LucasArts (and it seems unlike EA would even consider gog, so lets just say EA or LucasArts). I consider that big news, though of course I'd prefer to know who the 'definite' with 25 games signed is.
I think you meant to say " it seems unlike MS would even consider gog"

That fact that the definite publisher is bringing 25 titles to GOG pretty much narrows the possibilities to EA or Squeenix/Edios (assuming that MS is out of the question), I don't think the rest would even have 25 titles worth putting on GOG; in LucasArts case, that would be almost their entire library, which would be completely unprecedented.
avatar
cogadh: I think you meant to say " it seems unlike MS would even consider gog"

That fact that the definite publisher is bringing 25 titles to GOG pretty much narrows the possibilities to EA or Squeenix/Edios (assuming that MS is out of the question), I don't think the rest would even have 25 titles worth putting on GOG; in LucasArts case, that would be almost their entire library, which would be completely unprecedented.
Yes I did, (and now edited) - thanks. That's a good point. LucasArts does have a lot of games but 25 titles would be almost everything people might want from their catalogue (unless they hold rights to titles other than those originally published by LucasArts?).
avatar
AlexY: So wait;

- we get new high-profile classics
- we get confirmation of three new big publishers (one soon, two later)
- we get the Witcher for cheap and as part of W2 hype
- we get a site update soon with PM and new, still optional, downloader
- we get an update on GOG's well-off status

Which is completely not worthy of any kind of hype? Really?

Too much hype for "just that" you say? Oh. Ok. I just thought it's a very big thing for a smaller, newer digital store to be profitable and marketable and can reel in new publishers for non-DRM sales. But yah, that's so not important, since it's not System Shock or anything worthy of our precious internet time.

(/sarcasm)

I mean, no offense, but you're kinda bitchy.
- we get new high-profile classics - mmm, only a classic if you want it
- we get confirmation of three new big publishers (one soon, two later) yes, but shrouded in mystery once again
- we get the Witcher for cheap and as part of W2 hype - couldn't care less, not my type of game
- we get a site update soon with PM and new, still optional, downloader - my downloader works perfectly
- we get an update on GOG's well-off status - there are other gaming site, even that sell drm free games

Not ragging you or anything :-) just saying that because of the way that GOG handled this with all the mystery, people were bound to get expectant about their favourites. I'm sure some people were delighted with Atari, but others were disappointed.
I agree with basilizek and tarm.I can't believe I woke up at the crack of 2pm just to read this not so hype worthy news
avatar
bazilisek: *a bunch of stuff*
Honestly Baz? I think you're putting waaaaay too much thought into the announcements of new GOG stuff. Maybe its just my lax attitude on waiting for something I know is coming, but we get what we get when we get it. Big hype, little hype, normal hype, it doesn't matter. Several people will be thrilled with the next release, several people will be disappointed, and there will be several in between.

Regardless, we still get what we get when we get it.
avatar
bazilisek: *a bunch of stuff*
avatar
ChaunceyK: Several people will be thrilled with the next release, several people will be disappointed, and there will be several in between.
Great point ChaunceyK. Also just a request to all Goggers, not to flame anybody about their reaction, although a little debate is always cool hee hee. I for one was very dissapointed today, but I'm sure others downloaded Alone In The Dark right away.
avatar
AlexY: - we get new high-profile classics
- we get confirmation of three new big publishers (one soon, two later)
- we get the Witcher for cheap and as part of W2 hype
- we get a site update soon with PM and new, still optional, downloader
- we get an update on GOG's well-off status
avatar
Damuna: - Isn't that what we expect from GOG?
- Again, par for the course
- Should have been released months ago to promote the sequel
- Should have been done years ago
- Who cares? They're effectively bragging about how little they can give to their community and still have the money roll
100% agree!
avatar
ChaunceyK: Several people will be thrilled with the next release, several people will be disappointed, and there will be several in between.
avatar
jpinsa: Great point ChaunceyK. Also just a request to all Goggers, not to flame anybody about their reaction, although a little debate is always cool hee hee. I for one was very dissapointed today, but I'm sure others downloaded Alone In The Dark right away.
I agree with Chauncey on this.....everyone is getting upset over their own overinflated expectations here. And it's their fault in part, not just Gog's.
The LucasArts Star Wars games alone would easily be 25 games plus .....

It could certainly be them .....
avatar
jpinsa: I've also stated before that I really don't like the 1 or 2 games per week release thing. You know what GOG, release all the LA games one day and I guarantee that I will buy at least 50% of them in one go, and how many others would too.
GOG have three problems with that.

1. Many old games are hard to get to work on new machines and OS and GOG don't have that many employees working on it.

2. GOG usually don't get all the games a publisher owns. That's up to which the publisher wants to sell and for what price.

3. Good marketing. Releasing one or two games a week makes people come back regularly. Combine this with frequent sales and you have a winner.
If GOG released all games at ones many customers would buy what they want and then disappear.

These points are a bit annoying but I don't mind really. Except that publishers ain't selling ALL their games to GOG. ;)

avatar
AlexY: - we get new high-profile classics
- we get confirmation of three new big publishers (one soon, two later)
- we get the Witcher for cheap and as part of W2 hype
- we get a site update soon with PM and new, still optional, downloader
- we get an update on GOG's well-off status
avatar
Damuna: - Isn't that what we expect from GOG?
- Again, par for the course
- Should have been released months ago to promote the sequel
- Should have been done years ago
- Who cares? They're effectively bragging about how little they can give to their community and still have the money roll
Actually it's good they brag. They're basically telling business folks "Look this business model works and is profitable so do business with us because we'd both profit". So they're not bragging to us customers. This is why I call the conference a advert.

Edit:
avatar
jpinsa: Great point ChaunceyK. Also just a request to all Goggers, not to flame anybody about their reaction, although a little debate is always cool hee hee. I for one was very dissapointed today, but I'm sure others downloaded Alone In The Dark right away.
avatar
GameRager: I agree with Chauncey on this.....everyone is getting upset over their own overinflated expectations here. And it's their fault in part, not just Gog's.
I have a confession to make.
GOGs stunts usually irritate me a great deal but on the other hand they are a big part of why I come back here and participate in the community for a while. Guess I'm a masochist. :P
Post edited April 14, 2011 by Tarm
avatar
GameRager: I agree with Chauncey on this.....everyone is getting upset over their own overinflated expectations here. And it's their fault in part, not just Gog's.
avatar
Damuna: GOG decided to hype up the fact that they were doing their jobs. What do they want, a cookie?

Personally, I hadn't bothered getting excited, but I'm getting utterly fed up with the PR schemes - the tone of all of them is self-congratulatory, with GOG patting themselves on the back for nothing. Even worse, they're celebrating bad news and acting like we should be grateful to them. "Moto Racer 2 is broken? Look how great we are, allowing you to buy a broken game for years before taking it down! The Witcher 2 is DRM-free? Wait, sorry, we meant only on GOG - isn't that great!? The DLC for The Witcher 2 uses DRM? What are you talking about, of course it doesn't!"
Again it takes TWO parties to sustain hype, the ones who started the ball rolling and those keeping it alive with speculation.

As for all the good things they announced: New publishers coming to Gog, and possibly ones we've wanted for awhile now.....and a new PM feature coming as well. Plus the Witcher 1 on Gog! And more Atari titles. To say they're only talking about doing their jobs is accurate, but still not as bland and unwanted as you make it out to be.
Bad news? Yeah. Okay.
As for me the most important message from that conference was that gog.com business is running WELL: old publishers are happy with the sales and publish another portions of their back catalog, new publishers are coming (3 of 5 most expected/biggest will appear in this year!), development team improves site and adds new features etc.

Sure I would gladly hear some more details – but let’s face it – no matter how detailed gog.com would be – I always would like to know a bit more: “It’s EA? Great - so what games do they officially own, which games will be released first, could you be more elaborate on releasing agenda, what are other two publishers...”

What I didn’t like was:
- not keeping to announced time schedule! I had all nicely planned this evening (including putting kids to bed a bit earlier) – I turned on PC at 6:55 pm CET just to watch French Monk for entire 5 min :-(
- technical problems with watching conference live

Good they put video on site almost immediately.

I also think gog.com should suppress marketing messages a little bit. More information – less marketing babble. An example from today’s release: “Alone in the Dark 1+2+3” on game-page would look better than “Buy Alone in the Dark and receive a FREE copy of Alone in the Dark 2 AND Alone in the Dark 3!”
Post edited April 14, 2011 by tburger
avatar
GameRager: To say they're only talking about doing their jobs is accurate, but still not as bland and unwanted as you make it out to be.
avatar
Damuna: Did I say they were bland and unwanted? No. PMs? The Witcher? These things should have been done ages ago. I'm not going to tell GOG what a good job they've done for finally getting off their asses, and GOG should not expect me to do so.
Yes but GOG ISN'T telling you to do so......and you didn't SAY the announcements were bland and unwanted(the announcements being unwanted and the hype, not the actual things being announced.), just that it seemed they were to you imo.
Post edited April 14, 2011 by GameRager
avatar
GameRager: Yes but GOG ISN'T telling you to do so......
avatar
Damuna: GOG is going, "Hey, look at us, look!" That is telling me that I should care. My response is that I do not, and that their attempts to convince me that this is good news, or even news at all, only make me distrust them more as a company.
I meant TELLING as in ordering....they aren't ordering you to do so.......seriously you seem to be reading more into this than is healthy. Gog staff might slack a bit here and there in certain departments but they do some good for those that like what they do, and then you complain when they've done such stunts in the past and act as if it shocked you they did it again and thus they should be ashamed of themselves.


avatar
tburger: As for me the most important message from that conference was that gog.com business is running WELL: old publishers are happy with the sales and publish another portions of their back catalog, new publishers are coming (3 of 5 most expected/biggest will appear in this year!), development team improves site and adds new features etc.

Sure I would gladly hear some more details – but let’s face it – no matter how detailed gog.com would be – I always would like to know a bit more: “It’s EA? Great - so what games do they officially own, which games will be released first, could you be more elaborate on releasing agenda, what are other two publishers...”

What I didn’t like was:
- not keeping to announced time schedule! I had all nicely planned this evening (including putting kids to bed a bit earlier) – I turned on PC at 6:55 pm CET just to watch French Monk for entire 5 min :-(
- technical problems with watching conference live

Good they put video on site almost immediately.
I still have to watch it....was it any good then? I missed it as I overslept thus I have to play catchup on like 7 pages of the old CDP Days thread and 27 pages of the new one PLUS this thread and the Lucasarts is coming one..........this is gonna be murder on my fragile mind I tell ya.
Post edited April 14, 2011 by GameRager