It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
So I don't know about anyone else but I've figured out who has the valid sections by now and I highly recommend that future games NOT include invalid sections as it isn't conducive to game play. Right off the bat, I decided since I'm 1) not very competitive that 2) I was just going to go along for the ride and 3) definitely not win.

Anyone else share my thinking about this?
avatar
Momo1991: So I don't know about anyone else but I've figured out who has the valid sections by now and I highly recommend that future games NOT include invalid sections as it isn't conducive to game play. Right off the bat, I decided since I'm 1) not very competitive that 2) I was just going to go along for the ride and 3) definitely not win.

Anyone else share my thinking about this?
You are shrewd :o For someone that is not competitive, you seem to have gained more info than most others.
avatar
Momo1991: So I don't know about anyone else but I've figured out who has the valid sections by now and I highly recommend that future games NOT include invalid sections as it isn't conducive to game play. Right off the bat, I decided since I'm 1) not very competitive that 2) I was just going to go along for the ride and 3) definitely not win.

Anyone else share my thinking about this?
avatar
Austrobogulator: You are shrewd :o For someone that is not competitive, you seem to have gained more info than most others.
Perhaps but my point still stands ;-p
Ok, who here thinks that Xyem is being a sly fox?
avatar
Momo1991: So I don't know about anyone else but I've figured out who has the valid sections by now and I highly recommend that future games NOT include invalid sections as it isn't conducive to game play. Right off the bat, I decided since I'm 1) not very competitive that 2) I was just going to go along for the ride and 3) definitely not win.

Anyone else share my thinking about this?
So me - valid or invalid? :)
avatar
Momo1991: So I don't know about anyone else but I've figured out who has the valid sections by now and I highly recommend that future games NOT include invalid sections as it isn't conducive to game play. Right off the bat, I decided since I'm 1) not very competitive that 2) I was just going to go along for the ride and 3) definitely not win.

Anyone else share my thinking about this?
avatar
Novotnus: So me - valid or invalid? :)
PM'd you ;-p
avatar
Momo1991: PM'd you ;-p
You inquisitive Hyperbole! :)
Sly fox raids rabbit holes - just sayin ;-p

Den'o

Anyone that can tell me the reference gets to select from my ever-meager gift list.
avatar
Momo1991: Sly fox raids rabbit holes - just sayin ;-p

Den'o

Anyone that can tell me the reference gets to select from my ever-meager gift list.
That wouldn't happen to be from Fantastic Mr. Fox, would it?
Post edited June 06, 2013 by nightrunner227
avatar
Momo1991: Sly fox raids rabbit holes - just sayin ;-p

Den'o

Anyone that can tell me the reference gets to select from my ever-meager gift list.
avatar
nightrunner227: That wouldn't happen to be from Fantastic Mr. Fox, would it?
nope
...and good morning to you.

BlueMooner's presence in the game: NAY (sorry BlueMooner but it's hard to keep track for other 8 people, more will be even harder).
When someone is voted out of the game, their code segment becomes public domain: NAY.
Xyem or a person chosen by him will force one of us to reveal his \ her part without revealing it's validity: NAY
No one can post new dogma proposal until all previous proposals are accepted or rejected: YES.
within the next day, everyone needs to embed all of their letters/numbers (in order) within one post in this thread: NAY.
text only communication" to "text and images only communications. no videos. YES.
Post edited June 07, 2013 by GabiMoro
avatar
Momo1991: So I don't know about anyone else but I've figured out who has the valid sections by now and I highly recommend that future games NOT include invalid sections as it isn't conducive to game play.
Anyone else share my thinking about this?
I agree, I think future games should have the winning code split like this: ABCD-1234-EFGH-5678:
ABCD
CD-12 (sent to the player as CD12 or CD-12)
234-E
and so on
...so every player would have a section from the winning code.

Those who haven't vote for these I urge you to do so (YAY or NAY):
- Dogma is achieved at 51% agreement
- xyem must confirm if a segmet is valid or not.
- Everybody has to post their code in encrypted form or in a form of a riddle. Make it as hard as you can, but post it.
...and the proposals from my previous post (the one above this).

Till now 2 Dogmas have been achieved:
1. Dogma is achieved at 60% agreement. (instead of 75% agreement.), so if 6 people vote YES then the measure passes, if 4 people are against then the measure did not pass. (that is if the number of players remains the same - 9 players).
2. Players who do not post within 24 hours of their last post are removed from play.

Edit. You are right xyem, I corrected the infos.
Post edited June 07, 2013 by GabiMoro
avatar
GabiMoro: Till now only one Dogma has been achieved:
Dogma is achieved at 60% agreement. (instead of 75% agreement.), so if 6 people vote YES then the measure passes, if 4 people are against then the measure did not pass. (that is if the number of players remains the same - 9 players).
Two dogmas have been achieved. They are bolded in the opening post to show they are changes from the starting rule set.

For reference, the other is the mandatory post within 24 hours of the last post.
text only communication" to "text and images only communications. no videos - nay :p
text only communication" to "text and images only communications. no videos. Yes.
Query: What happens if one of the players breaks the rules (i.e. someone posts an image with his \ her part of the code before this dogma is voted)?