It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussion (archive)Do Islamists continue the holocaust?(81 posts)(81 posts)
(81 posts)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
This is my favourite topic
Posted March 22, 2012
avatar
michaelleung: No, that's a dog in a brand new military fighter jet. Jesus, what's wrong with you people? Don't you read the Jane's International Defence Review?
avatar
Rohan15: No, I'm busy studying and working my ass off. You, my friend, are in college and I assume are doing the same, except you have the time to actually read the review. Also, CUTE DOGGY :D
As a student of fine literature and journals of defence equipment, it is my academic duty to read such things.

Sometimes, even though I have The Economist on my iPad, I deliberately buy the latest issue of it at the airport to look smart on flights.
Posted March 22, 2012
Does that bit of 'research' look only at people who were legally carrying firearms, or just everyone who got shot while carrying them, even if they were gangbangers carrying guns for their own criminal purposes? And does 'carrying' mean carrying - as in, the weapon is readily accessible, or does it count weapons stowed such that they cannot be deployed? And did it measure gun ownership accurately among its control group?

Here's the study. Answers are: 'the latter', 'the latter', and 'no'. See for yourself.

Not that it matters. The bottom line is that if some predator comes after me - which is unlikely, but apparently quite possible - I don't want to have to depend on his mercy, divine intervention, or my nonexistent kung fu, the way those seven did. .45 ACP is universal sign language for 'please leave me be'.
Post edited March 22, 2012 by generalripper
Posted March 22, 2012
avatar
michaelleung: As a student of fine literature and journals of defence equipment, it is my academic duty to read such things.

Sometimes, even though I have The Economist on my iPad, I deliberately buy the latest issue of it at the airport to look smart on flights.
Journalism as in you want to be a reporter or journalism as a school activity?
Posted March 22, 2012
avatar
michaelleung: As a student of fine literature and journals of defence equipment, it is my academic duty to read such things.

Sometimes, even though I have The Economist on my iPad, I deliberately buy the latest issue of it at the airport to look smart on flights.
avatar
Rohan15: Journalism as in you want to be a reporter or journalism as a school activity?
Journalism as in I pretend to know what I'm talking about, and I write about it.
Posted March 22, 2012
avatar
Rohan15: Journalism as in you want to be a reporter or journalism as a school activity?
avatar
michaelleung: Journalism as in I pretend to know what I'm talking about, and I write about it.
Ah, so a Canadian Kotaku?
avatar
MonstaMunch: Let's be specific here. It's not "muslims attacking jews" and vice versa, it's Palestinians attacking Israelis and visa versa.

The difference is, if the Palestinians would just stop the fight, where would they go? Israel has literally taken their entire nation. They have no land of their own, and therefore have no option but to fight or die as a nation.

Both sides claim that ownership of the land is their "god given right", though one might wonder why said god waited until the 60's to give it to Israel.
avatar
XmXFLUXmX: Jews also don't have any land to go to, if they stopped fighting, then the Muslims would surely destroy them. This is most certainly a Jew vs Muslim conflict. Basically, what this really comes down to as a non-Jew or a non-Muslim is who would you rather have occupy that land, Jews, who have at the very least, shown they are civilized, or Palestinians, who create and shelter Muslim terrorists, a people who also were leaping in joy and celebrating when the U.S. was attacked on 9/11.
So much wrong in this thread....
Post edited March 22, 2012 by Rohan15
Posted March 22, 2012
avatar
MonstaMunch: Let's be specific here. It's not "muslims attacking jews" and vice versa, it's Palestinians attacking Israelis and visa versa.

The difference is, if the Palestinians would just stop the fight, where would they go? Israel has literally taken their entire nation. They have no land of their own, and therefore have no option but to fight or die as a nation.

Both sides claim that ownership of the land is their "god given right", though one might wonder why said god waited until the 60's to give it to Israel.
avatar
XmXFLUXmX: Jews also don't have any land to go to, if they stopped fighting, then the Muslims would surely destroy them. This is most certainly a Jew vs Muslim conflict. Basically, what this really comes down to as a non-Jew or a non-Muslim is who would you rather have occupy that land, Jews, who have at the very least, shown they are civilized, or Palestinians, who create and shelter Muslim terrorists, a people who also were leaping in joy and celebrating when the U.S. was attacked on 9/11.
It's a Zionist vs. Palestinian conflict. Don't lump all Jews into that, and don't lump all Muslims into that.

Personally both sides should just take a step back here. They should bond over their shared religious dislike for bacon.
Posted March 22, 2012
avatar
michaelleung: It's a Zionist vs. Palestinian conflict. Don't lump all Jews into that, and don't lump all Muslims into that.

Personally both sides should just take a step back here. They should bond over their shared religious dislike for bacon.
avatar
XmXFLUXmX: No, it is a Jew vs Muslim conflict. If the Jews would stop fighting, they would lose their homeland and all Jews, Zionist or not, would be affected.
No, it's a Zionist conflict. At best, it's a conflict based on a biblical text. And Israel is hardly a "Jewish state". The country tries extremely hard to maintain a secular society and the country frowns upon the imposing of ultra-Orthodox Jewish practices on the rest of society.

I'm thinking the easiest way to solve this is a game of Double or Quits.
Post edited March 22, 2012 by michaelleung
Posted March 22, 2012
avatar
XmXFLUXmX: Palestinians, who create and shelter Muslim terrorists, a people who also were leaping in joy and celebrating when the U.S. was attacked on 9/11.
Just about the only thing more disgraceful than your prejudice and racism is that you proudly wear a verse from scripture to justify yourself.
Posted March 22, 2012
avatar
XmXFLUXmX: Palestinians, who create and shelter Muslim terrorists, a people who also were leaping in joy and celebrating when the U.S. was attacked on 9/11.
avatar
rampancy: Just about the only thing more disgraceful than your prejudice and racism is that you proudly wear a verse from scripture to justify yourself.
Perhaps he is an atheist in disguise?
Posted March 22, 2012
avatar
XmXFLUXmX: No, it is a Jew vs Muslim conflict. If the Jews would stop fighting, they would lose their homeland and all Jews, Zionist or not, would be affected.
avatar
michaelleung: No, it's a Zionist conflict. At best, it's a conflict based on a biblical text. And Israel is hardly a "Jewish state". The country tries extremely hard to maintain a secular society and the country frowns upon the imposing of ultra-Orthodox Jewish practices on the rest of society.

I'm thinking the easiest way to solve this is a game of Double or Quits.
I don't get it. Please explain the Palestine-Israel conflict to me. Three words or less.
Posted March 22, 2012
avatar
michaelleung: No, it's a Zionist conflict. At best, it's a conflict based on a biblical text. And Israel is hardly a "Jewish state". The country tries extremely hard to maintain a secular society and the country frowns upon the imposing of ultra-Orthodox Jewish practices on the rest of society.

I'm thinking the easiest way to solve this is a game of Double or Quits.
avatar
spindown: I don't get it. Please explain the Palestine-Israel conflict to me. Three words or less.
It's fucking childish
Posted March 22, 2012
avatar
Rohan15: Perhaps he is an atheist in disguise?
I've actually come to believe Santorum, Romney, Gingrich, and everyone else of their ilk are actually atheists and agnostics in disguise.
Posted March 22, 2012
avatar
Rohan15: Perhaps he is an atheist in disguise?
avatar
rampancy: I've actually come to believe Santorum, Romney, Gingrich, and everyone else of their ilk are actually atheists and agnostics in disguise.
I think Santorum truly believes his crazy rhetoric. Nobody can keep a straight face for so long and say the shit he does. He's the real deal.
Posted March 22, 2012
avatar
Rohan15: Perhaps he is an atheist in disguise?
avatar
rampancy: I've actually come to believe Santorum, Romney, Gingrich, and everyone else of their ilk are actually atheists and agnostics in disguise.
Wrong

http://www.theonion.com/articles/voters-slowly-realizing-santorum-believes-every-de,27518/
Posted March 22, 2012
avatar
Rohan15: Perhaps he is an atheist in disguise?
avatar
rampancy: I've actually come to believe Santorum, Romney, Gingrich, and everyone else of their ilk are actually atheists and agnostics in disguise.
Well, yeah it's obvious:
-Santorum essentially hates marriage for everyone.
-Romney is an obvious moron, as all atheists are morons apparently.
-Gingrich...well.....no comment that guy is fucking nuts.
avatar
rampancy: I've actually come to believe Santorum, Romney, Gingrich, and everyone else of their ilk are actually atheists and agnostics in disguise.
avatar
spindown: Wrong

http://www.theonion.com/articles/voters-slowly-realizing-santorum-believes-every-de,27518/
Oh so true.
Post edited March 22, 2012 by Rohan15
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussion (archive)Do Islamists continue the holocaust?(81 posts)(81 posts)
(81 posts)