slash11: Alone that they dropped the nuclear bombs solely on civilian targets without any military purpose whatsoever should tell you the true story. How should Japan keep on a war when it is cut off by resources. The simple answer is they couldn't and they could only surrender.
without any purpose whatsoever... you really show that you don't know jackshit about what you're talking about. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were two very important military ports, with lots of heavy industries and chemical weapons crucial to the japanese war effort. Plus Hiroshima was the head quarters for the defense of the southern part of the japanese islands, the ones who would be invaded first by US troops if the war had to be brought to the japanese territory (they already had taken Okinawa). So, yes, Hiroshima and Nagasaki WERE major, strategic targets.
First, the americans had thought about nuking Kyoto, for the symbol (it's the cradle of the imperial dynasty) but one member of the decision team pressed the GHQ not to do so, as it would be not only slaughtering the population but also losing countless masterpieces of arts.
tejozaszaszas: Gamerager has been banned?
slash11: Anyone who has a different opinion than you should be banned that's laughable...
You don't have an opinion. You just repeat what the conspiracy theories have told you to believe. That's very very different. Plus a lot of what you wrote is borderline to negate the nazis war crimes and the Shoah and that's just unacceptable.
If you haven't read the very numerous books (historical ones, heh, not jewish-illuminati-from-hell ones) which studied in details all the crimes commited by the communist system all around the world, it's not my fault. But pretending there isn't any is a blatant lie.