Posted September 02, 2021
low rated
Ancient-Red-Dragon: If "Zoom Platform" chooses to double-down on its very bad decision to share its name with a different company that makes a mega-popular product, that would only ensure that "Zoom Platform" continues never to be taken seriously and never to gain any substantial market share (that is, even "substantial" in terms of the very tiny niche market that comprises DRM-free).
On the contrary: if "Zoom Platform" purports to take itself seriously, then it needs to get it's act together, and revoke that very bad decision, and change its name to something unique and that is befitting of a serious & credible business (which right now, "Zoom Platform" doesn't come across as being...at all).
In case you're not aware, Zoom Platform was founded before Zoom video chat and took the name before the latter came onto the scene. So, the clash is not the result of a 'very bad decision' on the part of Zoom Platform, but just a very unfortunate coincidence. On the contrary: if "Zoom Platform" purports to take itself seriously, then it needs to get it's act together, and revoke that very bad decision, and change its name to something unique and that is befitting of a serious & credible business (which right now, "Zoom Platform" doesn't come across as being...at all).
Personally, aside from the unfortunate name clash, I don't think 'Zoom Platform' is inherently a bad choice of brand at all. I wouldn't exactly call 'GOG' a good one. ;-)
Post edited September 02, 2021 by Time4Tea