RWarehall: The fact you seem to fall back to the "but how can we know about the contracts of Disney work". Well you can know, if you've ever worked in any industry where your clients are both big and small. Well you can know, if you've ever worked in any industry where your clients are both big and small.
I have not been saying "but how can we know about the contracts of Disney work". What I have been saying basically boils down to "how do you know how the deal between GOG and Disney was concluded" and it's precisely because there are few people who know exactly how these deals with big corporations work. Disney is not merely another client for GOG as any random small developer would be. In fact, I'm willing to bet that it's GOG that has to convince big companies like Disney, not the other way around.
And, like I said, there is probably a standard contract that they start with (or, more likely, several contracts to account for different countries' laws, etc.), but to suggest that every contract has to be the same, whether it's with a big multinational corporation or just a guy in a basement is a bit too hard to believe for me. And likewise I find it hard to believe that Disney just signs it without even getting lawyers involved.
RWarehall: But the fact is you don't have any clue what you are talking about, and have proved it post after post says all that needs to be said about your attitude. You call me condescending when you seem to think you've needed to correct me for days...
I have not been "correcting" you. I merely questioned your claims and I provided my reasons for doing so. And in fact, I did ask whether you had any proof for your claims and was quite interested in hearing it. Also, two days of posting in a thread is hardly anything remarkable.
What I got was you talking down to me, suggesting that I was living in a fantasy land, that I was on crack, that what I'm saying is a load of crap, etc. All that for merely suggesting that things might be different than what you say.
