It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
avatar
budejovice: Not exactly, though. Seems from the comments here lots of people will be "missing out". I don't think anyone in this thread is "no gOg, no buy." Some of us don't buy on Steam, but I personally have about 500 DRM-free games from other sites. I'm "missing out" cause I just don't like the guy.
avatar
amok: So a win-win sitation all around, then. I am pleased when things just sort themselves out.
You are such a loon. Fuck you and your Steam apologizing. It's a shit service. If we want shit, we'll go get shit.

But it's shit.
avatar
amok: So a win-win sitation all around, then. I am pleased when things just sort themselves out.
avatar
Atlantico: You are such a loon. Fuck you and your Steam apologizing. It's a shit service. If we want shit, we'll go get shit.

But it's shit.
Uncalled for personal attack. Any history between the two of you?

Also logical error. Amok is advocating, not apologizing. Apologizing kind of implies guilt, which begs the question of whether Steam is or not shit.

Your opinion that steam is shit is valid as your opinion. Others might disagree...
avatar
amok: Do you really think a indie developer and Disney will have the same contract? Honestly, are you saying you believe Disney's lawyers were not poring over it and making changes.... If anything it was gOg bending over backwards there. Sometimes you really baffle me..
avatar
RWarehall: Sometimes you really baffle me, the way you try to twist everything to be GoG's fault. I'm pretty sure every contract is pretty much the same. Just like every apartment contract is the same, because you can't go around making too many exceptions that you aren't giving to your other clients. Otherwise, they talk, it leaks out and the other publishers become unhappy. As I said in another post, a lot of people with no clue about how business works...
Umm..... I am really.... I don't know....... and to be honest, regarding that last line..... It was my exact same thought.....

I don't know, how to.....


Firstly - you may notice I have not placed blame on anyone, neither gOg nor Blow. To me, a negotiation like this sis normal practice (you kind say just as much yourself). If anything - the problem is the timeframe and Blow should have started it earlier. However, if it ends up without any deal because gOg refuse any negotiations, then I will blame them. But if it falls through rescue of unreasonable demands from Blow, then it will be his fault. The problem Herr is that non of us know any details.

Regarding - different contracts for different publishers.... what do you think those lawyers are getting the big bucks for? And it is up to everyone to negotiate the best deal possible. The difference between s small indie and a large publisher (like Disney) is experience, clout and time money. Disney can afford long protracted negotiations, most Indies can not and tend to not have the experience. You will also never see any such contract, as they will be bound by NDA's.

Lastly, while I am not putting blame on anyone, you certainly are doing so. But consider this, is not Blow just doing what any sensible person should do? ie. Read a contract before signing, and do not sign anything you do not agree to....
avatar
Atlantico: You are such a loon. Fuck you and your Steam apologizing. It's a shit service. If we want shit, we'll go get shit.

But it's shit.
avatar
Brasas: Uncalled for personal attack. Any history between the two of you?

Also logical error. Amok is advocating, not apologizing. Apologizing kind of implies guilt, which begs the question of whether Steam is or not shit.

Your opinion that steam is shit is valid as your opinion. Others might disagree...
I think I have seen him a couple of times, and this is just his normal way of behaving. This is especially funny as he is the first one mentioning Steam here. If anything, I will be getting the DRM free version from Humble.... maybe I am an Humble apologists :)

Just ignore him. I do.
Post edited February 01, 2016 by amok
low rated
avatar
Atlantico: You are such a loon. Fuck you and your Steam apologizing. It's a shit service. If we want shit, we'll go get shit.

But it's shit.
avatar
Brasas: Uncalled for personal attack. Any history between the two of you?
No, I have no idea who is this, who cares? It's always Steam, Steam, Steam... they guy is posting all day every day here, apologizing for Steam.

Also: advocating in this case, generally apologizing. Now you're apologizing Steam because others might disagree. Mmm some might disagree the sun is bright. Some might disagree Steam is shit.

amok is one of two Steam trolls on this forum. Just ignore him. I usually do, but hey it's the first monday in february.
Why are there two threads by same OP on this? Is he on the dev's payroll or something?
avatar
Niggles: Why are there two threads by same OP on this? Is he on the dev's payroll or something?
the other one got necro'd by somebody to post an emoticon it seems
and that other one is about braid
avatar
Niggles: Why are there two threads by same OP on this? Is he on the dev's payroll or something?
Barry does not need to get paid to post a lot about getting more games into GOG. :)

I sometimes wonder if he or TinyE is more representative of our forum culture... which come to think of it, would be a very amusing showdown... The Green Tentacles vs The Orange Metalhead. Place your bets.

PS: he'll always be the orange astronaut to me...this new incredulous face avatar is kinda weirdly dissonant...
low rated
avatar
amok: Umm..... I am really.... I don't know....... and to be honest, regarding that last line..... It was my exact same thought.....

I don't know, how to.....

Firstly - you may notice I have not placed blame on anyone, neither gOg nor Blow. To me, a negotiation like this sis normal practice (you kind say just as much yourself). If anything - the problem is the timeframe and Blow should have started it earlier. However, if it ends up without any deal because gOg refuse any negotiations, then I will blame them. But if it falls through rescue of unreasonable demands from Blow, then it will be his fault. The problem Herr is that non of us know any details.

Regarding - different contracts for different publishers.... what do you think those lawyers are getting the big bucks for? And it is up to everyone to negotiate the best deal possible. The difference between s small indie and a large publisher (like Disney) is experience, clout and time money. Disney can afford long protracted negotiations, most Indies can not and tend to not have the experience. You will also never see any such contract, as they will be bound by NDA's.

Lastly, while I am not putting blame on anyone, you certainly are doing so. But consider this, is not Blow just doing what any sensible person should do? ie. Read a contract before signing, and do not sign anything you do not agree to....
Sorry to disappoint you, but I doubt in most cases you even get a lawyer involved except maybe to give the contract a quick read through. Do you really think Steam is bringing lawyers to the table and negotiating for each and every game on the service? If someone has a game in which they own the clear rights for (like selling a car and there is a clear title), here's the standard contract. Look it over, maybe run it by an attorney. Sign and return.

At worst, you negotiate the terms back and forth through E-mail, when you finally agree, the company draws up the contract, same process. This idea that lawyers are following everyone around for every decision says you watch too much television.

But there you go apologizing for Mr. Blow, claiming he's just being "sensible". I guess it's also sensible calling GoG dicks on Social media too? Sorry, but GoG is better off without this guy and his games. And maybe this serves as a good example why some other games aren't here. Individual egos; developers who think they are such hot shit, they can change the way GoG's business works.
Post edited February 01, 2016 by RWarehall
avatar
RWarehall: But there you go apologizing for Mr. Blow, claiming he's just being "sensible". I guess it's also sensible calling GoG dicks on Social media too? Sorry, but GoG is better off without this guy and his games. And maybe this serves as a good example why some other games aren't here. Individual egos; developers who think they are such hot shit, they can change the way GoG's business works.
I find this idea ridiculous. What does it matter if people have large egos? We come here for the games, it's not like Jonathan would show up and say "ohh, look at me." Has that ever happened?

I've played over 10 hours of the The Witness and I can safely say this game definitely should come here.
low rated
avatar
Nirth: I find this idea ridiculous. What does it matter if people have large egos? We come here for the games, it's not like Jonathan would show up and say "ohh, look at me." Has that ever happened?

I've played over 10 hours of the The Witness and I can safely say this game definitely should come here.
And should GoG let Mr. Blow schedule his own sales? Or change the price of his games on Tuesdays? Or whenever he wants? My understanding of his gripes with GoG's contract were that he didn't have complete and total control over price changes and sales. On Steam, if someone wants to raise the price of his game to $200, he could, Steam doesn't care.

Just because you like the game doesn't mean GoG needs to bend over backwards to the demands of a egotistical maniac.
deleted
Post edited February 01, 2016 by Fairfox
avatar
RWarehall: My understanding of his gripes with GoG's contract were that he didn't have complete and total control over price changes and sales. On Steam, if someone wants to raise the price of his game to $200, he could, Steam doesn't care.
No, according to the report he didn't like GOG's terms, not that he had complete control of it even if it might mean he wants more control. I seriously doubt he wants to suddenly charge $200 for a game, that has not happened ever, given his already, relatively high price tag for an "indie" title.

It's all speculation in the end, none of his information on the matter can be verified by a trusted party and GOG has not revealed anything.
avatar
Nirth: I find this idea ridiculous. What does it matter if people have large egos? We come here for the games, it's not like Jonathan would show up and say "ohh, look at me." Has that ever happened?

I've played over 10 hours of the The Witness and I can safely say this game definitely should come here.
avatar
RWarehall: And should GoG let Mr. Blow schedule his own sales? Or change the price of his games on Tuesdays? Or whenever he wants? My understanding of his gripes with GoG's contract were that he didn't have complete and total control over price changes and sales. On Steam, if someone wants to raise the price of his game to $200, he could, Steam doesn't care.

Just because you like the game doesn't mean GoG needs to bend over backwards to the demands of a egotistical maniac.
Wow. Egotistical maniac even. Somebody is a bit of a drama queen, don't you think? It must be wonderful to have you insight into the inner thoughts of all the individuals involved (GOG and the dev) to make blanket statements and draw conclusions based on twitter posts. Oops, I guess I did the same to you.
avatar
Nirth: snip
There have been reports his issue was the terms involving pricing and sales. There is not just one report as you claim.

But it really doesn't matter. The point is, most of the games rejected by GoG were not very popular, most with poor sales on Steam, and these desired games, GoG could not reach a deal. Too many people are trying to conflate the two of these. Braid and The Witness were not rejected by GoG. Period. Despite misleading titles on some of these threads concerning "second chances" and "rejected games".

The facts are a couple weeks ago Mr. Blow called the GoG contract "predictably lame" and then recently claimed he didn't have time to deal with GoG because the game just got finished. Basically, seems he is making shit up as he goes and likely has no real intention of bringing his games here. From his Tweets, he's clearly a bit of an egotistic hothead anyway.

So the answer to the OP appears to be "No".
avatar
amok: Umm..... I am really.... I don't know....... and to be honest, regarding that last line..... It was my exact same thought.....

I don't know, how to.....

Firstly - you may notice I have not placed blame on anyone, neither gOg nor Blow. To me, a negotiation like this sis normal practice (you kind say just as much yourself). If anything - the problem is the timeframe and Blow should have started it earlier. However, if it ends up without any deal because gOg refuse any negotiations, then I will blame them. But if it falls through rescue of unreasonable demands from Blow, then it will be his fault. The problem Herr is that non of us know any details.

Regarding - different contracts for different publishers.... what do you think those lawyers are getting the big bucks for? And it is up to everyone to negotiate the best deal possible. The difference between s small indie and a large publisher (like Disney) is experience, clout and time money. Disney can afford long protracted negotiations, most Indies can not and tend to not have the experience. You will also never see any such contract, as they will be bound by NDA's.

Lastly, while I am not putting blame on anyone, you certainly are doing so. But consider this, is not Blow just doing what any sensible person should do? ie. Read a contract before signing, and do not sign anything you do not agree to....
avatar
RWarehall: Sorry to disappoint you, but I doubt in most cases you even get a lawyer involved except maybe to give the contract a quick read through. Do you really think Steam is bringing lawyers to the table and negotiating for each and every game on the service? If someone has a game in which they own the clear rights for (like selling a car and there is a clear title), here's the standard contract. Look it over, maybe run it by an attorney. Sign and return.

At worst, you negotiate the terms back and forth through E-mail, when you finally agree, the company draws up the contract, same process. This idea that lawyers are following everyone around for every decision says you watch too much television.

But there you go apologizing for Mr. Blow, claiming he's just being "sensible". I guess it's also sensible calling GoG dicks on Social media too? Sorry, but GoG is better off without this guy and his games. And maybe this serves as a good example why some other games aren't here. Individual egos; developers who think they are such hot shit, they can change the way GoG's business works.
There is really no point continuing. I do hope at some point you get the experience of running your own business, you will quickly notice it is not the same as renting a flat or buying a car....

I am not excusing Blow, but he saying gOg are dicks on Twitter, and not signing a contract he do not like are two very different issues. The former is unprofessional, the later is sensible. (Try googling "poisoning the well").

And it is as he says, he do not need gOg, so there is no reason for him to bend over to be here. Therefore, it does not make sense for him to sign a contract he do not like.....which really no one should...

Those who want the game DRM free, can already get it, and those who only buy on gOg? *shrug* their own problem, and I doubt that market is very great. So the best thing to do is probably leave things alone and let Blow and gOg work things out or not. In any case, whatever the result, it will really have very limited impact on anything at all.

Anyway, I will leave it there.