It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Fenixp: Damnit.

I removed the +.

Bastard.
avatar
Brasas: Ok then... I admit TinyE's tentacles are somehow charming... so maybe him?

There. I said it.
Here's a clip of TinyE and his tentacles in action. (warning, it's not a pretty sight)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtgFKdWcKXY
avatar
Emob78: snip
I didn't say pretty, I said charming, wouldn't you agree?

Such a heartwarming video. It is cold up in Nebraska... or wherever tiny actually lives. Nice that there's friendly folk around.

Although seriously know... not green enough... you sure that's not some relative?
avatar
Gnostic: snip
avatar
Brasas: I don't want this to be too personal mate.

In terms of defining tolerance, consider this as a simpler answer than the one I gave you. You asked "So you still define tolerance as everyone must talk to each other even on things they don't agree on. Am I right?"

I told you no. Because of the implication about imposition carried by the "must" you used. I assume you chose the words carefully and wanted the must to be there. But let's take the must away.

Tolerance is everyone talking to each other even on the things they don't agree on.

Does that really seem not to fit? To me that fits. It's not all of tolerance, but it is part of it. Ignoring someone can be tolerance, especially as an alternative to punching them - but ignoring does not define tolerance.

What do you think?

PS: Some years ago a girl called Jane was in love with me. I did not reciprocate because I liked someone else called Judy. I did nothing to Jane. I did nothing with Jane. I ignored Jane. Jane was hurt by that.

Inaction can cause harm. Causing harm may not imply responsibility. I am not responsible for Jane hurting. But I caused it. And yet, I did nothing.

See what I mean? It's not illogical. It's logical. Also tragic, but that's a separate point.
So you agree that while ignoring is not tolerance, it can be a subset of tolerance?

Your analogy regarding Jane has a flaw. It is not your inaction that cause Jane harm. It is Jane herself that cause her harm.
If I jump from a 20 story building, can I say the ground kill me? No I kill myself.
Can I say you who is standing near me kill me by your inaction to stop me? No I kill myself.
Can I say the workers that build the building kill me? No I kill myself.

But I get it, when something goes wrong, humans like to blame on something other then themselves.
avatar
Gnostic: If I jump from a 20 story building, can I say the ground kill me? No I kill myself.
Can I say you who is standing near me kill me by your inaction to stop me? No I kill myself.
Can I say the workers that build the building kill me? No I kill myself.
Well, actually what kills you is the inelastic collision of a rigid body (ground) and a soft body (yourself). You see, your soft tissue and blood vessels are damaged by the sudden stop and the force applied by the ground. Same thing happens to your bones and organs. All of this causes internal bleeding and death. The main cause of this damage is the force of deceleration. You see, your velocity will reach zero rather quickly upon contact with the ground and all your kinetic energy will be transformed. To death.
Post edited March 12, 2016 by sunshinecorp
Brasas.
You got political ambitions or are aiming for a sociology/culture career?
Post edited March 12, 2016 by Tarm
low rated
avatar
Brasas: I don't want this to be too personal mate.

In terms of defining tolerance, consider this as a simpler answer than the one I gave you. You asked "So you still define tolerance as everyone must talk to each other even on things they don't agree on. Am I right?"

I told you no. Because of the implication about imposition carried by the "must" you used. I assume you chose the words carefully and wanted the must to be there. But let's take the must away.

Tolerance is everyone talking to each other even on the things they don't agree on.

Does that really seem not to fit? To me that fits. It's not all of tolerance, but it is part of it. Ignoring someone can be tolerance, especially as an alternative to punching them - but ignoring does not define tolerance.

What do you think?

PS: Some years ago a girl called Jane was in love with me. I did not reciprocate because I liked someone else called Judy. I did nothing to Jane. I did nothing with Jane. I ignored Jane. Jane was hurt by that.

Inaction can cause harm. Causing harm may not imply responsibility. I am not responsible for Jane hurting. But I caused it. And yet, I did nothing.

See what I mean? It's not illogical. It's logical. Also tragic, but that's a separate point.
avatar
Gnostic: So you agree that while ignoring is not tolerance, it can be a subset of tolerance?

Your analogy regarding Jane has a flaw. It is not your inaction that cause Jane harm. It is Jane herself that cause her harm.
If I jump from a 20 story building, can I say the ground kill me? No I kill myself.
Can I say you who is standing near me kill me by your inaction to stop me? No I kill myself.
Can I say the workers that build the building kill me? No I kill myself.

But I get it, when something goes wrong, humans like to blame on something other then themselves.
Your flaw in Gnostic's analogy itself has a flaw. In some cases (especially if the target is a victim of bullying or abuse), it is possible to blame somone else for a suicide. Look at Tyler Clementi (abuse by roommate) and Leelah Alcorn (abuse by parents), and those are not the only examples out there.
avatar
Gnostic: If I jump from a 20 story building, can I say the ground kill me? No I kill myself.
Can I say you who is standing near me kill me by your inaction to stop me? No I kill myself.
Can I say the workers that build the building kill me? No I kill myself.
avatar
sunshinecorp: Well, actually what kills you is the inelastic collision of a rigid body (ground) and a soft body (yourself). You see, your soft tissue and blood vessels are damaged by the sudden stop and the force applied by the ground. Same thing happens to your bones and organs. All of this causes internal bleeding and death. The main cause of this damage is the force of deceleration. You see, your velocity will reach zero rather quickly upon contact with the ground and all your kinetic energy will be transformed. To death.
Good, so I can blame kinetic energy for my death.

But I want to blame Brasas for not stopping me jumping. How do I do that?
avatar
Tarm: Brasas.
You got political ambitions or are aiming for a sociology/culture career?
I also wonder that. :)
avatar
Gnostic: But I want to blame Brasas for not stopping me jumping. How do I do that?
Easy. Leave a suicide note blaming it all on Brasas. Or scream "it's Brasas's (ssasss?) fault!" all the way down.
Post edited March 12, 2016 by sunshinecorp
avatar
Tarm: Brasas.
You got political ambitions or are aiming for a sociology/culture career?
avatar
sunshinecorp: I also wonder that. :)
Yes the questions in the original post is a cut and paste job from those fields. Made me not want to read the thread and instead ask what I did.
avatar
sunshinecorp: I also wonder that. :)
avatar
Tarm: Yes the questions in the original post is a cut and paste job from those fields. Made me not want to read the thread and instead ask what I did.
I also did that. :)
Let me find it... there:
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/what_kind_of_community_do_we_want/post149
Post edited March 12, 2016 by sunshinecorp
avatar
Tarm: Yes the questions in the original post is a cut and paste job from those fields. Made me not want to read the thread and instead ask what I did.
avatar
sunshinecorp: I also did that. :)
Let me find it... there:
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/what_kind_of_community_do_we_want/post149
So maybe I should have read the thread anyway? ;)
avatar
sunshinecorp: I also did that. :)
Let me find it... there:
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/what_kind_of_community_do_we_want/post149
avatar
Tarm: So maybe I should have read the thread anyway? ;)
Is it really necessary, though? Don't all politicians sound the same?
avatar
Tarm: So maybe I should have read the thread anyway? ;)
avatar
sunshinecorp: Is it really necessary, though? Don't all politicians sound the same?
Truly. My first assessment of the thread still stands then. :)
avatar
sunshinecorp: Is the OP running for president, or what?
avatar
Brasas: Would you vote for me?
I would.
avatar
Brasas: Would you vote for me?
avatar
Klumpen0815: I would.
About the only one I'd like to vote for is a scientist.