There's a lot of posts I really don't remember or didn't have patience for or didn't have further information (at the time). Sometimes the information/references simply comes later (it's only been a month afterall). One of the discussions was on voter/voting/election fraud but with widespread news all over of said fraud going do I really have to go back for that?

Still... there is normalcy bias, and quite a few people will refuse to even consider something contrary to their beliefs. If I see theories or explanations that are better I'll go with them. Little else to do except that for now.

You seem to be quite poor at recognizing your own.
Then acknowledge this rather than rudely ignoring those who just made their arguments. Go back and supplement your own arguments later with the new information you've found, and continue the discussion from there.

There's a distinct difference between debating and preaching. Which is it you seek to accomplish?
If you genuinely want to learn more about the subjects you're interested in, the only way to learn the real "truth" is to listen to the opinions of others and engage in a rational debate. In that case, you should heed the advice of myself and others who've already told you exactly what to do.
If you don't care and only want to make people listen to your own opinions in the hopes they'll agree with you, you and I have nothing more to discuss here, and there's no point in me engaging you any further because nobody can possibly learn anything constructive. At that point, you only wish to spam for the sake of spam itself, and you deserve any criticism you get for doing it.

spam
spam/Submit
noun
1.
irrelevant or unsolicited messages sent over the Internet, typically to large numbers of users, for the purposes of advertising, phishing, spreading malware, etc.
2.
trademark
a tinned meat product made mainly from ham.
verb
1.
send the same message indiscriminately to (a large numbers of Internet users)..
STOP TROLLING!

I see a lot of conflicting information, and I have to look to other sources to consider what and why. Natural sugar is generally good for you when eaten in it's natural form, Processed sugar is bad for you, yet in the 70's and earlier Sugar was pushed out as not only a sweetener but pure calories. We know sugar is bad for us (but is in everything now) but looking back 50 years we can see real studies vs hired fake studies to convince the public. Thus using that logic and knowledge I have to consider all the negatives before I consider any positives. The negatives are enough to realize any positives aren't worth it. (Much like drugs, take care of 1 symptom, get 10 more)

So I should go back and scan through the last 1100 messages for incomplete conversations that are over a month old, while already putting usually 8-10 hours of attention on keeping up with events on top of it.

While I don't disagree, it is a lot of effort for little gain. It's also exhausting enough already with what I am keeping up with.

Questioning the system can be constructive and important. I do care, but until I see something so conflicting that makes me drop my current objective, I'll keep on. Just because there's a log in the road doesn't mean you don't keep moving forward, it just means you muddle through it or solve the problem. Maybe not the way you intended to, but it will happen.

I really wish I had more hours in the day and wasn't stressed out, then this could be far more engaging. But I can only do what I can do.

Actually, it's not "little" gain. It's a lot of gain. In fact, it's the way you get the MOST gain.
If you only get your information from one source, you're just as bad as the people who only ever pay attention to mainstream media. You have no guarantee that your information is any less biased or controlled.
Or, to put it in language more direct to you:
How do you know your grassroots organization dedicated to truth wasn't started by the government in the first place?
That is, of course, an extreme example compared to what I'm getting at, but perhaps it can make you understand more.

The only way you can ever ACTUALLY get information is by listening to the people who are disagreeing with you. Consider what they're saying. Consider WHY they're saying what they're saying. Ignore it, and you set yourself up to be a tool for the next Jim Jones.
I concur that you should always question the system, but you seem to be doing less questioning and more just blind accusing.
You've had several things to conflict you, but you, so far, have chosen to completely ignore them. Perhaps if you'd actually pay attention to what's being said with you, you could discover a lot more about your own views.
You're not traveling down a road and facing logs. You're standing in one place and shouting at people. You're not actually actively seeking knowledge (because if you were, you'd take the time to listen to the arguments of others rather than spend all your days religiously following Infowars and other sources), and you're most certainly not solving anything.

Let me express this yet again:
If you truly want to have a full understanding of what you're investigating, skip the spamming of links. Keep the information to yourself, and use it when it fits to explain an argument. Instead, present your arguments, one at a time, and get information on them from other people, especially those who don't necessarily share your viewpoints.

https://www.gog.com/game/xanadu_next

I hope the Gog staff will remove those two " reviews " and reviwers from the page .

rdit : They fixed it .

For the record, I'm not contributing to the flagging this time. I'm done with doing GOG's dirty work, got better things to do. Like missreading.

Seems like some fake passport spamming is going on here.

Korean spammer alert!

qkdqodksak is spamming General with threads in what I think are Hangul.

Batten down the hatches! Action stations!

Kim Jong Un is upon us... again !

Ennnh. henh hun. Hmmm.

I thought the forum gained sentience and is speaking to us in Matrix code.

Oh dear, is it that time of the year again?