That only works if people actually go to the trouble of verifying sources, which is extremely rare; in fact, the reason most people go to sites like Snopes to begin with is so they can avoid the tedium of verifying sources, so that's a worthless and disingenuous disclaimer.

Good job Lin, you managed to turn a gaming forum into a rally for little wannabe white socialists. :P

So you're going to chimp out until the thread gets locked? o.O

I meant only to illustrate that the format of your post was particularly hard to follow. A much better one would have been a summary, followed by link or links. Like so: Other than that, having spent as much time as you have on these forums, you should have known better than to start a topic like this and expect a nice politics-free discussion.

Either way, good luck. I didn't mean my first post, or this one, to be a personal attack on you.

Fake news alert! Need fact-checkers -- STAT!!!

I'm concerned about the idea of this, seeing legitimate news sites being censored or outright blocked like "The Intercept", "The Guardian", "Al Jazeera English", "Der Spiegel", etc.
"The Intercept" is already on the government's hit list for employing Glenn Greenwald who has consistently and deservedly humiliated some agencies within' our government(God forbid our government should lose Face and save American and foreign lives in the process). Additionally, employees in one of the intelligence agencies were told to ignore the site even. God forbid credible journalism should be read.

Not taken as attack. Thank you for response! I tried to reformat, I hope I failed closer to landing spot now.

I hope I fixed it now, Яight Angled Ponies are officially banned from here.

Am I the only one who completely fails to understand the OP and sees just badly phrased incomprehensible sentences full of words without proper common meanings to them before his eyes? Or rather, common words with uncommon meanings implicated, I don't know, I know I can't make sense of it.

IMHO the Original Poster has his Tin Foil Hat on too tight......

Granted,a lot his rants are incomprehensible, but I did get the usual CT crap.

tl;dr Firefox plans to censor stuff they don't like.

A corporation imposing censorship on the internet should be cause for concern, but apparently it is now okay because... ? I honestly have no idea why. Last I had heard, most people disliked China's version of the internet. Guess I've been away too long.

It would be impossible to have a global communist takeover nowadays unless you shut down the internet but since shutting down the whole internet may not be technologically possible anymore, they will try to censor it with so-called artificial intelligence. DARPA invented the internet to provide anti-communist forces with a decentralized command and control system in the event of a limited nuclear exchange followed by Soviet invasion in case the Cold War went hot. Now after a successful infiltration by communist elements a generation later, DARPA has to ironically undo its own creation.

The communists still haven't found a way to mitigate those 100 million pesky American militiamen though...

Thank you. I knew firefox has been trash for many years and a lot of the idiots that use it claim "mozilla cares about your privacy".
I wonder how they'll defend this.