TStael: Rude, dense and misandryst?
You really have not ever come across a fellow fora member a bit different in their values as you, before?
Really?
You were the one whom thought awry of "she." I think "she" is neutral/fine in these fora. You were the one whom stated "electrocuting," Opposing death penalty is pretty normal in Europe.
So please - do abuse someone as dense and rude as me. I still will not think Mexican children should be executed, or are nothing but children.
LeonardoCornejo: No. It is not a general rule. I think you don't understand the concept of individual cases and case by case basis. Each case individually. Death penalty is a drastic measure to the most serious actions. It is a way to guarantee with 100% certainty there will be no repeats. Trust me, many Nazi officers were executed for their actions because the chances of them starting the same shit again were high.
Now, it is not that your values are different, many around here have different values to mine, for example many consider the minimal consenting age in Mexico and Japan too low, I find it just fine.
"The correct neutral is neither he nor she, the correct neutral is it, or if you want to sound a bit confusing, they, I think we have reached an agreement on that. And if I don't like being called a she is because, first, that is a false statement about me, I don't like false statements, second, I use my true name, so nobody could confuse me for a female, there are no women named Leonardo at all, and third, I am not amused with the "preferred pronoun" thing. If you are physically male, you ara a man to me, and I will address you as such, if your screen name is male and I can't see your body I will assume you are male. That is why I said the she was uncalled for, because it was not necessary."
If you think you can go and provoke me you will find yourself in a serious pickle because I am not the kind of man who goes for the low hanging fruit and uses petty insults and threats. I am far worse than that because I refute the arguments I can and use those refuted arguments to prove you are in fact either foolish, insane, a liar, or someone who has been lied to.
PS: And sorry if I think Carlos Salinas should have been killed many times, but after seeing how he fucked, and still fucks my country through proxies, I want him dead.
Whether you go on about death penalty or age of consent - I prefer legal principle to case by case, by Scandi and EU morality.
Is this morality tougth? you might ask. Wrong question I think. I simply think human life is invaluable and children should have the rights to be children.
What do you mean? you probaly ask. Let me tell. Human beings are not rid of their lives by the state. And children are not legally copulated with.
And I'd suggest not to try your gender distiction complex with a Finn.
Finnish - with only Turkish I think - has but a word for the third person. Those "she" and "he" you fuss about are simply "hän" in Finnish.
There is no "she" or "he" - only hän.
And if you must now, "it" is "se." Meanwhile "se" would never be used for humans, but some excessive dog lover migth use "hän" in substitute for "she" or "he".
All of us Finns are "hän" when referred to in third person.