Ignoramus: There are several things I could really "bitch" about at the moment, but one case takes the cake.
My co-worker recently told me her ex-boyfriend beat her quite badly earlier this year(she was on a sick leave for a while, so I had no idea what had happened to her). She even showed me a photo of her face the day after the assault. It was not a pretty sight.
The asshole denied beating her, and the cops said there's no evidence, so the fucker got off without charges.
Now she has to go through therapy in order to cope with that shit. She honestly is one of the most calm, gentle and passive individuals I have ever met in my life, which is probably why she got caught up with that dipshit in the first place.
Now the thing that pisses me off the most, is that the walking garbage is not going to suffer any consequences, at least when it comes to the Finnish law.
I have some second- and third-hand connections to people who might be willing to extract some street justice for the right price. I'm tempted to utilize them.
Because there are people who believe you need audio recordings, video recordings and more before you can say someone is guilty of something. They believe you have to prove someone is guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt. I am not one of those people...
Ignoramus: Now the thing that pisses me off the most, is that the walking garbage is not going to suffer any consequences, at least when it comes to the Finnish law.
I have some second- and third-hand connections to people who might be willing to extract some street justice for the right price. I'm tempted to utilize them.
iippo: If you get beaten, look like youre beaten, go straight to see doctor and then go to see police about it (with ofcourse doctors papers that youve been really beaten) - i dont see how that could end end up with just "no evidence".
Maybe she thought the pic would be enough.