RWarehall: Screw you. It's your fault too. And everyone else. Assign the blame to me?
@ ZFR see what RW did there? That's how you handle bait as scum - you fake being the hurt towny.
You could not have had a better scum mate.
ZFR: Wow. Thanks for the kid gloves. ...
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ It is a good movie...
RWarehall: Brasas, all you do is shitpost.
LOL
RWarehall: The summation of your numerous walls of text is ZFR and RW are just so scummy ...
... because ZFR overextended on his LAMIST no vote on himself, got nervous at the backlash and lost his mind, melted down up to shitposting under pressure, and is now FUDing the game to hell. And you buddied to him, ignoring how blatantly non Liberal his reactions were. ZFR is not Drealmer RW, and even Drealmer was scum some of the times he went kaboom.
I understand that repetition even of something super obviously BS like "ZFR is a paragon of Liberal virtue" can work for you. I hope that fellow Liberals will not drop the ball and keep their cool through all the mess you two are raising.
RWarehall: ... you are being just too entirely dismissive of EVERY other post being made.
Not EVERY... mostly just all the FUD you and ZFR are throwing up.
The discussions that are worth having I am paying atention to:
1 - "voting" on who should be investigated by dedo
2 - discussing who would be the next government before greek's
Maybe you pipe down a bit and let other Liberals get their time in the soapbox? Even going along with the ridiculous assumption that you and ZFR are Liberal and I am Scum there would be 4 more Liberals that you are effectively silencing.
greeklover: Posting valid analysis doesn't make you trustable.
Bingo. Or in other words: effort posting can be faked. Hence why prog matters, because scum knows more than they let on, and it's good to notice their faked prog shift due to opening of gamestate opportunities from actions of the less predictable townies.
greeklover: And I see no reason that some people trust others that haven't been at least 90% confirmed.
As you yourself noticed at some point Liberals have to go on faith... it's absolutely impossible for most of the liberals to know much for certain.
ZFR: snip
Was
that the reason for Brasas's "default NO"??
Default No increases the number of votes on governments, therefore offers more information for analysis. Extreme No defaulting by all the players is of course not fertile ground for analysis but still no downside because it only shifts the government that would get the default Yes.
I do like it that you are now going in the Greek is Hitler direction. Your divine inspiration via random.org was truly inspired. :)
greeklover: The thing is there is a PROVEN very big chance I am liberal.
ZFR: No, no, no. The thing is there is a PROVEN very big chance you are
not fascist.
What's the difference? I thought Hitler is also Fascist for faction...
ZFR: What do you mean "manipulation of the votes"?
+1
greeklover: Posting his guess before the votes are submitted could be seen by some as a sign to fascists to cover themselves by voting yes. He didn't think of that? ...
*scratches head* Well... I have done a lot of such manipulation of the votes, but in the opposite direction. I was super explicit about No voting for Liberal reasons and I think overall discussing votes in advance is positive for Liberals. I was ok with Lift's idea and didn't ask anyone what they'd vote but you might recall I wanted everyone to discuss what approach they preferred.
So what you call manipulation I actually call leading by example...
I mean, I'm not perfect and I can't think of everything... in fact I feel like RW and ZFR are demanding a lot of my attention. But this is a team game, and there's 5 more of you in my team whom I have to trust will pull through.