It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Test your resolve and management skills in a real-time strategy game in which you play the role of a global organization that has to deal with a global pandemic. Issue decrees, manage resources and construct buildings while works on the vaccine take place. COVID: The Outbreak from Jujubee S.A. is now available DRM-free on GOG.COM with a 10% discount lasting until 15th June, 1 PM UTC.

Note from the developer and publisher: 20% of all net sales from the game throughout May and June will be donated to the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and other charitable foundations supporting the fight against the consequences of the coronavirus pandemic.
low rated
avatar
Lifthrasil: Let's see who is going to be fired about this release. The last perceived insensitivity led to the discharge of Linko. Let's see how it goes this time.
I don't know about others, but I DO NOT want anyone fired or the game removed(let people buy what they want)...I want them to acknowledge their rule about politics is a laugh in the face of such release and either cut it back/be more lenient with it, or drop it almost entirely(short of posts that get too out of hand or break other rules).



=======================

avatar
TheMonkofDestiny: The GOGBear will get put into a rocket and scapegoated directly into the sun for this indignity.
Which one...there are multiple bears. :)

=================================

avatar
kohlrak: I've left because the politics and the impossible standards for avoiding political discussions irked me. I decided to stick to game specific forums (actually, only 1, and because i felt i had an issue to address [eventually decided to contact the devs directly]). However, i must break this vow of silence for this game... We need to worry about how our politics look on the forums until we can make a sale on it i see... Now it's not just an impossible standard to avoid politics, but a double standard! SARS-CoV-2 and how to handle it is very much a political issue, so now GOG wants to support things it agrees with while banning discussion on politics? I'm absolutely sure they're doing a good job banning all discussion on it as well, outside of this game.

But, hey, i'm a free speech absolutist, so i think it has a right to exist. I think gog should freely allow as many games as possible. However, GOG should know damn well that this is going to put it's curation under much, much more scrutiny at this point. All the games it rejects and rejected in the past in favor of this obvious tone-deaf cash-in? Either come up with some standard we can verify for your curation, or abandon it entirely, because i think most people would say this is not something to make GOG alot of money over something like pro-trump or pro-biden propaganda. Insted of pissing off "one camp" you manage to piss off everyone with this. Sure, it should be allowed on here, but beware the outrage over the next game you reject.
Well said.....I agree with the bulk of it, and also dislike the double standard of "Don't talk politics on the forums! & "But buy this political game!"
Post edited May 31, 2020 by GameRager
avatar
Lifthrasil: Let's see who is going to be fired about this release. The last perceived insensitivity led to the discharge of Linko. Let's see how it goes this time.
avatar
GameRager: I don't know about others, but I DO NOT want anyone fired or the game removed(let people buy what they want)..
I don't want anyone to be fired either. But if there is a backlash GOG might find a scapegoat again.

But yes, having a 'no politics' rule and then publishing political flame-bait games is a bit two-faced.
low rated
avatar
Lifthrasil: I don't want anyone to be fired either. But if there is a backlash GOG might find a scapegoat again.
You might be right.

Weird Idea: They could "hire" someone then "fire" them a bit after and claim they "fired" someone.

avatar
Lifthrasil: But yes, having a 'no politics' rule and then publishing political flame-bait games is a bit two-faced.
I've actually been thinking on that....imo it is possible they put those rules in place mostly for good PR and to shut up the complaints after the social media incidents.

(Also one of the main reasons I am upset at this release is that several of us got "vacations" from talking about covid in the covid thread, and now they allow this here because they can make money from it)
Post edited May 31, 2020 by GameRager
avatar
TheMonkofDestiny: The GOGBear will get put into a rocket and scapegoated directly into the sun for this indignity.
Nope... oO
avatar
real.geizterfahr: Nope... oO
I wrestled over whether it was more inhumane with the GOGBear or GOG-chan. :P
low rated
avatar
TheMonkofDestiny: I wrestled over whether it was more inhumane with the GOGBear or GOG-chan. :P
Well at least GOG-chan can find work after being fired...what work can GOG bears get(well besides zoo, circus, russian citizen).

(Also before someone points out the russian citizen bit, it is from a skit where all russians were bears on unicycles)
Post edited May 31, 2020 by GameRager
avatar
TheMonkofDestiny: I wrestled over whether it was more inhumane with the GOGBear or GOG-chan. :P
You can do with GOG-Chan whatever you want. She doesn't even have a name and I've only seen her once. I don't really care for her. But... Theodore Fourofourski? Leave him alone!
This terrible game is on steam, too. Shame.
avatar
Spectre: There were middle eastern wargames when the the Iraq and Afghanistan wars had started.
avatar
GameRager: We're they titled Iraq of Afghan war or similar, or were they based around such conflicts? I ask as there were middle eastern wars/battles before those ones, and those games might've been based on those much earlier battles.

======================================

avatar
Gersen: Like I said earlier, Cancer is still very current right now and is killing and impacting way more lives than Covid-19, and will continue to do so long after we have a vaccine for the later, yet we have tons of media using it as their premise. Same thing happened some years ago when AIDS was at its worse.
avatar
GameRager: Yes, but afaik not much of it(if any)(I mean games and movies and such) was made when those diseases first hit or were discovered.....but made when people had become more or less "used"** to both illnesses.

(**=i.e. once people stopped focusing so much on them as a collective whole).

(Or it was "serious" documentary type stuff)

==================================

avatar
dudalb: I will defend the makers right to bring this game out as a matter of free speech, but slightly irritated they are finding so many blind defenders here.
avatar
GameRager: What do you mean MANY defenders? Most of the posts here seem to be AGAINST it.
Afghanistan published by Slitherine for example.
I remember a discussion about how Apple demanded the removal of any game element pointing at the ongoing conflict. ( think of names such as Taliban etc etc )
avatar
4QxBHRUT: "If I don't like it, nobody can like it! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"

So much whining from the mental midgets, if you don't like it don't play it.
It's freedom of speech for the game. I don't like the timing of it, but I support it in a way, could've of been more palatable. But it happened. And I'll play it in the future when C-19 ends if I don't die. What's your analogy of that midway position?
I'm glad GOG is publishing games that are surely timeless and without any attachments to shortlived current events that will nigh on likely be completely irrelevant within six months to a year.
avatar
falloutttt: -Developer's Letter from Marketing.-
And this is why Marketing, Sales, and Advertisement staff have my eternal ire.
avatar
Themken: No surprise to see a game like this but a surprise to see it on GOG. I guess this means it is of much better quality than these games usually are.
Reeks of Lipstick on a Pig, to me.
Post edited June 01, 2020 by Darvond
avatar
Breja: I sure hope all the outraged people never once smirked at any Covid-related meme and while not posting here spend their time giving every monster posting coffin dance a good talking to.
I've mostly stuck to eye rolling myself, and my ire is more about how irrelevant this game will be in the coming time when we all have gone onward from this event and onto the next one. Sure, it reeks somewhat of profiteering to some degree, given they aren't just taking donations, but my question is one of a longer sight:

What of the game when this is all over and we moved on with our lives? I don't mean to state that question as without emotion; I'm aware of those directly affected, but I mean to posit it bluntly. What's the point of making a game based on current events?
avatar
Darvond: What of the game when this is all over and we moved on with our lives? I don't mean to state that question as without emotion; I'm aware of those directly affected, but I mean to posit it bluntly. What's the point of making a game based on current events?
Just because the Coronavirus crisis will end someday, doesn't mean that viruses go away. You can easily swap out "Coronavirus" with "Bubonic Plague" and be just as valid. People who play Outbreak may apply their digital experience with disease management to inform how they handle a real-world virus.

The gamers of today may be tomorrow's scientists and politicians.
avatar
Darvond: What of the game when this is all over and we moved on with our lives? I don't mean to state that question as without emotion; I'm aware of those directly affected, but I mean to posit it bluntly. What's the point of making a game based on current events?
avatar
Sabin_Stargem: Just because the Coronavirus crisis will end someday, doesn't mean that viruses go away. You can easily swap out "Coronavirus" with "Bubonic Plague" and be just as valid. People who play Outbreak may apply their digital experience with disease management to inform how they handle a real-world virus.

The gamers of today may be tomorrow's scientists and politicians.
Which asks the question: Why not just change it to as already suggested by others, a fictitious diseases?