It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
high rated
avatar
Miljac: I love this site, I love it to a point that I bought my games almost exclusive through GOG in past 3 years. You continue to bring DRM free titles for us to purchase and that is awesome.
I am a relatively new guy around here. But the reason I chose GOG over Steam (which is the prevalent store in the market here) is because I found it to be operating on principles different to its competitors.
avatar
Miljac: Galaxy is an optional client I get that, I don't mind it, I am using it, but being optional is not good enough. With your last decision you will make it intrusive [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrusiveness], and intrusive is as bad as mandatory, and all that under some lame excuse that it is friendly to new customers. You have made galaxy a bloatware to anyone who regularly backs up their library and bloatware is not the term you want galaxy to be associated with.

Solution:
Being optional and non intrusive is the way to go. Some say you should leave checkbox to install it unchecked by default, and that would be much better. But even better (my personal opinion) would be if you only included download link to galaxy. That way, you will not bloat installer with galaxy client.
I also Use Galaxy, I find it useful for Some tasks. But then I would want it to be Optional in the true sense of the term, Optional as you promised. It already has a prominent banner and links on the home page. Anyone who wants it can grab it there. Why would you need to bundle it with OFFLINE installers. And as someone pointed it out in another thread most of those games bundled with Galaxy don't even support cloud saves and such. So what's the point.

Don't try to follow steam. You are a company founded upon different principles. Grow based on those principles.
Remember you have come this long way being what you are.
avatar
richlind33: One day it's boring and mundane, and the next it's like a page out of Naked Lunch. o.O
avatar
Lord_Kane: I'd rather not recall that movie.
Burroughs' life might suggest how. ;p
Post edited May 10, 2017 by richlind33
avatar
Miljac: get some official commentary
avatar
zeogold: Good luck with that.
And some more good luck!
/ I sign it. Thank you.
I mostly agree, however I don't think GOG will reconsider the Galaxy thing. My only hope is that the extra code won't bloat the installers to much and that if once opted out, it stays that way. I can live with that.
low rated
deleted
/ I sign my agreement with your letter
high rated
avatar
blotunga: I mostly agree, however I don't think GOG will reconsider the Galaxy thing.
avatar
Fairfox: Me neither; s'clear taht they want to be a Steamie contender so are crowbarrin' Galaxy on peeps in somewhat underhand wais to spread it, which, Honest Lee, is plain dumb becaaause it ain't nevah gonna happen when it comes to contendin'. Carve out your niche, make profits, be happy. Hippy-hoppy-happy.
Exactly. GOG based it's very existence on NOT being Steam. Now they try to be Steam more and more. If they complete that path, they will just be swallowed by Steam or fail due to too much competition. And some other DRM-free store will pop up where all the disillusioned former GOG clients will gather.
avatar
Miljac: Hi GOG, long time customer here

Maybe I am not as vocal as some, but I have a something to say now, so I'll make it as open as possible. I want to make this post as an open critique, so let's get the good stuff out of the way first, so we can concentrate on the bad and the ugly.
<snip>
Very well stated Miljac, +1. I believe you've taken the words right out of many people's mouths and that many both vocal and non-vocal people consider your words as representative of how they're feeling right now as well. I know I am.

Thanks for speaking up and sharing your viewpoint on this one!
high rated
literally nobody in the decision process cares, but +1
Post edited May 10, 2017 by AlienMind
Thank you for support everyone!
avatar
blotunga: I mostly agree, however I don't think GOG will reconsider the Galaxy thing. My only hope is that the extra code won't bloat the installers to much and that if once opted out, it stays that way. I can live with that.
From the size of the downloads for the Sierra Conquest games,..released last Thrusday...it won't. I suspect what the option does, if accepted, it link to the GOG website and downloads the Galaxy Installer.
avatar
blotunga: I mostly agree, however I don't think GOG will reconsider the Galaxy thing. My only hope is that the extra code won't bloat the installers to much and that if once opted out, it stays that way. I can live with that.
avatar
dudalb: From the size of the downloads for the Sierra Conquest games,..released last Thrusday...it won't. I suspect what the option does, if accepted, it link to the GOG website and downloads the Galaxy Installer.
It won't be implemented until Friday.

[EDIT] And the Conquest games aren't on the list of games that will be initially affected by this.
Post edited May 10, 2017 by tremere110
I don't use Windows so have no idea how was Galaxy sneaked into the installers. Is it like the full client is there and there is an option to install it or simply a link to download it?
avatar
Miljac: ...
Pretty much my thinking too. Also the "fanboyish" part *blush*

Although I'm really too old to be "fanatic" about something. Privilege of the young...