HypersomniacLive: Compare their pic (1st attachment) to mine (2nd one). Notice a significant difference?
Thank you. It's important notice.
So if this code is for free game, he couldn't buy it. Petty liar. =|
Lin545: A guy in black mask, who failed to steal something from the shop because the owner was well-aware, is not a thief.
Not until he actually manages to steal something.
Yes. This is how law works.
*sigh*
Okay, this is how it
should work. Maybe you remember what Scharapow said about law? When it is violated for retributive application, even for righteous one, a law becomes a flail.
I know how ridiculously idealistic it sounds, but I want to believe in people. Especially here, in this great community.
Lin545: But legally, even trying to steal something already qualifies as act of theft, just the sentence is milder.
That's right. But even attempt should be proven in court.
And in this case, which is fraud, not thievery, it might be hard to prove.
I do not excuse scammers, but I don't want some unlucky slowpoke to be condemned because of my mistake. Not least because that unlucky slowpoke could be me.
Resnot's case is now clearly obvious, though.