It certainly is interesting. At this point he's obviously trolling and bulk spamming nonsense information. And if I retaliate it will only cause headaches...

Although I wouldn't object if they just disappeared.

I wouldn't go that far.

If someone here was looking to board a plane it would be quite handy.

Remind you of someone? Or is it too fucking subtle?

Of course! You!

I suppose. But it's heavily OT.

Ah, the "no, you are!" defence. The six year olds have taught you well, grasshoper.

Can't we just get along? lol

So what about 18 million fraudulent or invalid votes in 2012? Or 1 in 8... (And 1.8 million are dead voters)

http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/13/voter-fraud-real-heres-proof

http://nypost.com/2016/10/11/elections-official-caught-on-video-blasting-de-blasios-id-program


By the way, I'm paying attention. Sometimes I just have to wait for the articles to come in, and not even very long.

I like turtles.

The PEW study makes no such claim, however.

Apparently not. Let me tell you what the articles you linked say:

The first one says that approximately one in eight voter registrations was inaccurate, or incomplete, in 2012 (your information isn't badly out of date but it isn't current). This could be as little a problem as a correctly registered voter has moved their place of residence since originally registering to vote. Indeed, the article that your source uses is a Pew research piece which, interestingly enough, says that one in eight Americans has moved residence during the 2008 and 2010 voting seasons. That's the whole 18 million. And none of those are fraudulent votes. They're inaccurate voter registrations, which are totally different. Like I said before when you posted garbage, you don't even know the difference between voter fraud and voter registration fraud, much less what the numbers you're quoting actually mean. In fact, no vote fraud is reported by the sources you cite. Once again, you have failed.

Your second source is an opinion piece and gives no numbers whatsoever. It is nothing more than one low-ranking official complaining about something while offering no evidence to support his claims. Much like what you're doing.

You aren't paying attention, rtcvb. You aren't right about anything you're saying. You don't even know what your sources say. How do honestly expect anyone to take anything you say seriously when you're not right about anything?

[url=http://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/pcs_assets/2012/pewupgradingvoterregistrationpdf.pdf]http://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/pcs_assets/2012/pewupgradingvoterregistrationpdf.pdf[/url]

Err... it doesn't?? Looks like it to me. Here's from the PDF from PEW. And yet you skip over the 1.8 million dead voters. Dead voters THAT ARE BEING REGISTERED...

If you just want to stick your head in the sand that's fine.

edit:

How was it that the KGB agent said? Even if i shower you with evidence, even if i took you and showed you the concentration camps, you don't believe it even then.

You need a hysterectomy.

NOT VOTERS. You're only a voter IF YOU VOTE. Getting deregistered to vote requires a death certificate and paperwork. It takes time. At any given point, there are over a million people who have died recently enough that a quick poll of registered voters will include their names. But they don't vote, so they're not voters. Again, the difference between voter registrations and voters. Very important.

Put down the keyboard and go exercise. Your brain desperately needs the increased blood flow.