RWarehall: Scroll up!

Everyone's definition of spam is different, but stalking a thread repeating the same basic thing over and over (while basically ignoring anything anyone else is saying) constitutes spam in my book. It's not like lazydog's point has changed at all. It's pretty easy to follow.

"I don't think Infowars is real news. Stop it. I'm reporting you. Everyone hates you anyway. Go away."

How many posts of this does it take to constitute spam in your book?

zeogold: I've challenged rtcvb32 here to present me with 5, just 5, people who have expressed active interest in his thread

zeogold: His point is the same, but at least he's arguing it intelligently. I can respect that.
rctvb32 isn't arguing anything, he's just posting links and going away until he comes back to post more. As I said before, if there's actual discussion about the topic with active interest, it ceases to be spam. I've yet to see that for this thread, though.
It would be different if he were repeating that exact same phrase over and over again without explaining himself.

zeogold: His point is the same, but at least he's arguing it intelligently. I can respect that.
rctvb32 isn't arguing anything, he's just posting links and going away until he comes back to post more. As I said before, if there's actual discussion about the topic with active interest, it ceases to be spam. I've yet to see that for this thread, though.
It would be different if he were repeating that exact same phrase over and over again without explaining himself.

MaGo72: I'd like tp point you at page 40 of this thread, rtcvb32 discusses topics with other users, apart from those that engaged early in the "this is spam" war and some personal attacks ot just trolling him.

RWarehall: So you are claiming what I said isn't intelligent and not worth your respect. Your opinion but I feel the same about your butting in here. It's not like GoG has ever censored threads. So why is this all of a sudden a cause celebre?

It all smacks of social bullying and harassment. Good to see the "popular kids" think they can tell all of the school's social misfits what they should be thinking and how to act...

MaGo72: I'd like to point you at page 40 of this thread, rtcvb32 discusses topics with other users, apart from those that engaged early in the "this is spam" war and some personal attacks or just trolling him.

zeogold: Which I was pleased to see when he started doing that...until he went back to spamming links. The page numbers are different for all of us, but if this is the point I'm thinking of, I even asked for people to quit harassing him so long as he was finally having discussion rather than his normal "post links and ignore everyone" tactic.
I don't even want the thread to be closed, I just want some actual productive sharing of ideas rather than...whatever this is.

zeogold: Whoa now, slow down. When did I ever say that? o_O
I'm fine with you sharing your opinion and I never said you were discussing things unintelligently, nor did I say you were spamming.

RWarehall: Look at the first line of your post. Your opinion is quite clear...
"His point is the same [as mine], but at least he's arguing it intelligently. I can respect that."

zeogold: I meant that he was arguing intelligently as opposed to rtcvb32, not you. I don't consider links alone to be an intelligent argument.

MaGo72: Eva Bartlett :)

zeogold: Could you please explain the content of that video? I don't really have the time to do much more than skip through it.

MaGo72: It is about the war in Syria(especially about Aleppo) and that the narrative we get from the msm does not quite fit what is happening on the ground.

Btw this thread was started on 09.09.2016, rtcvb32 could have posted exatcly 100 posts of Infowars shows, if Alex Jones would make every day a show. This thread has 1813 posts...