You need to realize that international organizations aren't wrong by principle. The instances where people stand against any foreign body doing anything in their country to counter ''globalism'' is based on generalizations and misinformation. If a country is ever to be fully rid of intervention from such organizations, then that country would have absolute power to crack down on anyone and anything in their land and have no independent body to question it. Amnesty Intnl is one such organization that can be such a watchdog. They too are a check for power and play a role in bringing accountability to the government of a country as well as bringing attention to issues that the local media may be barred from doing.

So it is a balance. Of having enough independent monitors of power (or the level of nutrition, or health of environment or whatever) and not being complete slaves to them, like opening up the country fully to be exploited with free trade agreements and foreign contracts.

But your stance of such organizations being only bad for a country is honestly quite stupid. You know which other country has completely ''de-globalized''? North Korea, where we don't even know the state people are in beyond occasional reports from journalists because they don't allow external monitors to come in and investigate.

I just found out yesterday that Norway have been funneling millions into the Clinton-family-foundation, all the way since 2007. About nearly 650 million NOK from 2007 to 2019 is going to fund this alleged corrupt foundation, that's almost 80m USD.

Again and again, she have been manipulative and incompetent to separate her roles, even Obama told her to build walls around her private life, her foundation and her role in the politics. Yet, she not only misused her political role to actively promote her foundation, she also cross used mail accounts whenever it suited her...

Just now the Norwegian government are realizing it's fault and are downsizing the payments, just because of the bad publicity and the election... now it seem to stop next year, in 2017.

http://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/regningene-som-viser-norsk-clinton-stotte/62312635 (UD denies any transactions, from September)
http://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/vurderte-brudd-med-clinton-stiftelsen/62778096
http://www.hegnar.no/Nyheter/Politikk/2016/11/Norge-kutter-gigantoverfoeringer-til-Clinton-stiftelsen (Norway is withdrawing support)

Some people clearly can not think longer than their own nose and consequences of their action, apparently. I would say that most "foundations" that Norway are funneling money into doesn't add up to actual use, technically. I've yet to evidence of these money are being put to good use in the long run, with the exceptions of few projects in Africa.

Contrary to popular myth - we're not rich, but we do snake us in under the rugs of others just as a political strategy. You never know when these money will save some of our politicians later in life, as a returned favour. And look - our former prime minister is now the head of NATO, before that head of WHO ;-)

EDIT:

http://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/pengedryss-over-clinton/60264257

"Foreign Minister Brende had a strong desire to give money to this Clinton project. The desire was so strong that he claimed an internal Norad report chose to ignore its own stated policies. Assistance to small and scattered island states are not in line with the program of assistance that the government itself has presented and adopted by the Parliament."

deleted

Whats up my nigga eurotards???
The Majority of the Untied States is mental <-- shit is bipartisan.

lefty's nobody wants your white supremacy utopia crap.

Keep on Dreaming!

So how's you're great leader been lately? I heard he eats on behalf of his people.

I don't watch TV

http://www.amerika.org/politics/alt-right-revelation-diversity-does-not-work/


http://www.anus.com/zine/articles/nazi/

One ancient saying which proves globalization, despite being carefully engineered, violently forced even, meticulously baited, downright instigated at times or simply appealing to the masses, will fail: Because, "Divide and Conquer".

Its like the incompatibility of an organ transplant in the human body. Incompatibility will bring downright conflict and ultimately, the organ will cause malfunctions or stopping of vital functions, death of the entire body, or the body will reject it and try to replace it with a more compatible one, should it survive the whole ordeal first, obviously. But globalization 's proponents are too busy attacking their teachers over Halloween costumes, instead of studying history, or science, even while claiming that science is their "god".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bx0uMxkC7zw

YEA!

Thought this article might be interesting for someone here:

Break Up the Democratic Party: It&rsquo;s Time for the Clintons and Rubin to Go &ndash; and Soros Too

Down syndrome buttercup?

Besides admitting to turning in jews during ww2 to be executed?
Or the fact his emails were hacked too?

Same reason morons suck up to Efag on GOG... morons are morons.

The first link says different groups cannot co-exist in a society. So people must be absolute carbon copies to peacefully co-exist? There can be no society where one or more persons have to tolerate the actions of some other person or people. Simply saying multiculturalism has failed is probably a sign that its not tolerance for other races that has run out but tolerance for people who disagree with you, which is kinda scary considering even Merkel is said to have said it. Either way, the concept that coexistence cannot ever exist is dumb, because there will always be differences among humans and such differences necessitate tolerance.

The 2nd link seems to be some kind of eugenics blog? Either way, thanks for getting me on that watchlist. I read the contents fully and the guy seems to be looking for a world where countries are based on ethnicity and he seemingly believes that to be the bare minimum that is necessary for cultural preservation. That itself is very stupid because culture includes the present as well, and all the shit about it degrading whether true or not is based entirely on criteria. Eg a society may have degraded when it comes to procreation but intellectual diversity may be high. And what is or isn't better is based on opinion.

He also seems to be a kind of international level SJW when it comes to mixing of cultures. They both want cultures to be segregated from eachother but he wants it on a national level where a country = ethnicity while SJWs want segregation within a country.

How is all this retarded stuff even related to my post?

That's not the same prime minister (just pointing it out for others), and Stoltenberg got the gig in NATO by "helpfully" destroying Libya on Clinton's "advice". Norway carried out an obscene amount of bombings, and as usual in these modern air superiority wars, we ran out of targets, so the standing order was "bomb whatever you feel like".

Country of peace, indeed.

And right now we are restructuring the military to join more of these wars in the future, and buying a crapton of new planes from the US. Oh, and new spy planes and submarines so we can spy on Russia for the US (coupled with the Globus II radar a stone-throw from the Russian border).

Would be nice if Norway had a foreign policy of its own. It doesn't. Not really.