It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
sanscript: You my friend - don't like progress or anything that has "liberal" in it, do ya' ?!?

Just to wake you up; people with the scary word "liberal" attached to them haven't really ruled America in a long time, so you should blame someone else.

Blame Canada for example, like everyone else. I believe that's the easiest option. ;p
avatar
Years_of_Chaos: What progress?
Exactly.
avatar
Trilarion: I don't think Russia is instable and needs a strong dictator. My guess is that with an independent justice and freedom of press and without corruption and a strong democracy they would be much better off.

Just look at all their resources? Probably the same like in Norway. They are rich beyond dreams. But the people instead have a very low income and bad public services. They don't manage the natural riches of their country like for example Norway does and there is a serious risk it will all be gone at some point. I see Putin rather as key player of the system.
Norway's model will not work here. It was discussed over and over here.
Norway's population is 5 million people, Russia's - 143 millions (google's data).
Norway's territory is compact, thus administration is easy and much more effective. Don't forget it's location.
avatar
Trilarion: I don't think Russia is instable and needs a strong dictator. My guess is that with an independent justice and freedom of press and without corruption and a strong democracy they would be much better off.
Well, yeah, of course, but those things can be a difficult goal, and take a long time.

Look at France : It took us nearly a century (1789 - 1870) after our Revolution to get to a somewhat stable democracy. And those were bloody years, rife with warfare (both internal and external), return of the old masters (Monarchy came back to power twice), 2 bloody handed populist dictators (both Napoleon Bonaparte and his nephew, Napoleon III, were wildly popular), and several aborted regimes...
And even then, the 3rd Republic (1870 - 1940) was far from perfect.

Building a democracy is a complicated affair.
avatar
catpower1980: Well, you two still have the option of moving to Wallonia as it has been under the left-wing for decades (and it's not gonna change soon). Although I'm not sure you could handle what real socialism (not the US one) is :o)
avatar
vulchor: Wallonia is a part of the Netherlands, currect? My European ancestors emmigrated from the Netherlands, although I'm not sure if they were Walloons. Unfortunately unless you are rich it seems next to impossible for a US citizen to move to a European nation. Otherwise I'd do it immediately.

I'm curious as to why you said I couldn't handle that type of socialism? Is it like the democratic-socialism of Sweden and Norway? Those are the political attiutudes that I believe I share most, and I love what the Dutch do as well, especially their environmental reforms.
Prior to the independence of Belgium, it was either part of Netherlands or France, depending on the international situation through History.

I say "real" socialism as while we have a lot of advantages (most of medical care is nearly free, good social welfare, cheap colleges/university, etc.), it clashes with the economy. You're a boss and wanna hire somebody? You'll have to pay the equivalent of around the monthly salary in monthly taxes. You wanna start a LLC (to avoid personal liabilities)? You'll have to pay 18.500 euros just to establish it. No wonder a third of our jobs is in the public sector :o)

There is enough material to write a book about it but the TLDR is that pure socialism without any regards to economy just leaves a poor territory with no prosperous future. It's common knowledge that if Wallonia were to get its independence, it would quickly end up like Greece. So, the trade-off for you as an American would be getting into a "lack of perspectives" paradigm. It's a bit like between living in Detroit or Los Angeles: you can be poor in both but you'll have more opportunities to improve your situation in the latest.

PS: Look at the map in this article, even the recent refugees don't want to stay in Wallonia :o)
http://www.laprovince.be/1709545/article/2016-11-03/de-plus-en-plus-de-refugies-quittent-la-wallonie-pour-rejoindre-la-flandre
avatar
Trilarion: I don't think Russia is instable and needs a strong dictator. My guess is that with an independent justice and freedom of press and without corruption and a strong democracy they would be much better off.
avatar
Kardwill: Well, yeah, of course, but those things can be a difficult goal, and take a long time.

Look at France : It took us nearly a century (1789 - 1870) after our Revolution to get to a somewhat stable democracy. And those were bloody years, rife with warfare (both internal and external), return of the old masters (Monarchy came back to power twice), 2 bloody handed populist dictators (both Napoleon Bonaparte and his nephew, Napoleon III, were wildly popular), and several aborted regimes...
And even then, the 3rd Republic (1870 - 1940) was far from perfect.

Building a democracy is a complicated affair.
Was it worth it?
avatar
Kardwill: Well, yeah, of course, but those things can be a difficult goal, and take a long time.

Look at France : It took us nearly a century (1789 - 1870) after our Revolution to get to a somewhat stable democracy. And those were bloody years, rife with warfare (both internal and external), return of the old masters (Monarchy came back to power twice), 2 bloody handed populist dictators (both Napoleon Bonaparte and his nephew, Napoleon III, were wildly popular), and several aborted regimes...
And even then, the 3rd Republic (1870 - 1940) was far from perfect.

Building a democracy is a complicated affair.
avatar
Dismember77777: Was it worth it?
Well, I'm a rabid anticlerical republican (in the French "down with the nobility and with the Church" sense, not the American one), I come from a humble peasant family, and I was born 1 full century AFTER the "bloody mess" part. And I kinda love my country, despite all its faults. So I'll obviously reply "sure, it was worth the trouble"

Not sure the guys who died during Napoleon's conquests or during the Vendée civil war (also know as "the Hell Legions war") would agree with me, though.
avatar
richlind33: ...What I think is interesting is the polls seem to be suggesting that a lot of Trump voters are well aware that he's a rather deeply flawed person, which tells that they would have voted differently if a better choice had been available, and that's pretty sad, because there *should* have been better candidates available.
avatar
Trilarion: He won the primaries. So at least there weren't better candidates. Which are the better candidates and why didn't they show up in the primaries and won them?

I hope that voters didn't just vote for him out of a fancy but really believe in him. Actually I wonder if this is true, do they really, deep down in their heart, are convinced it will be better for them? Because this is just unlikely. It's more likely things will go downhill economically with Trump. We will see but I don't think he is extremely competent nor has the right ideas. But I wonder if the voters for Trump actually believe that he has a good plan? I strongly doubt that many people would believe in his plans or his competence but I cannot imagine them voting for him without believing in him.

All in all just an expression of how little I understand about the US voters. Falling for the populist guy, what ever came good out of that? History should teach you that lesson really quickly.
Rand Paul is vastly preferable to Trump, but he had no chance because he's a serious threat to high finance and doesn't stoop to demagoguery.

I think a lot of people saw two stinkers, one where you knew exactly what you'd be getting, and another that was something of a wild-card -- and they also felt that they didn't have a great deal to lose. And I think it's rather foolish to assume that they're mistaken.
avatar
Dismember77777: Was it worth it?
avatar
Kardwill: Well, I'm a rabid anticlerical republican (in the French "down with the nobility and with the Church" sense, not the American one), I come from a humble peasant family, and I was born 1 full century AFTER the "bloody mess" part. And I kinda love my country, despite all its faults. So I'll obviously reply "sure, it was worth the trouble"

Not sure the guys who died during Napoleon's conquests or during the Vendée civil war (also know as "the Hell Legions war") would agree with me, though.
That was actually a great post.
low rated
avatar
Elmofongo: She's an awful candidate yet you say she is the lesser of 2 evils? At this point this is just choosing Stalin or Trotsky.
Stalin or Hitler, Elmo, not Stalin or Trotsky. o.O
low rated
avatar
Lin545: Bye Killary!
Yep, history with "Russia's best friend" Boris Johnson might repeat.
I hope it won't. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
avatar
KiNgBrAdLeY7: ...Globalization will be halted, if not stopped dead in its tracks ...
Fat chance. Would you be willing to take a bet about that? I guess that Trump will just play nicely with his millionaire buddies. They won't change a single thing but blame someone else. You'll see.
HA! Italy is still on the world's political avant-guarde! We starterd Berlusconism way sooner than Trump! /s

Seriously, though: if I ever hear an American joking about Italians and how stupid they were to vote a sex-addicted, bankrupter homophobe and chauvinist demagogue I'm gonna kick their ass. Hard. Like, Duke Nukem hard.
Post edited November 09, 2016 by Enebias
low rated
avatar
Elmofongo: She's an awful candidate yet you say she is the lesser of 2 evils? At this point this is just choosing Stalin or Trotsky.
avatar
richlind33: Stalin or Hitler, Elmo, not Stalin or Trotsky. o.O
Are you a Trotsky sympathizer?
avatar
Enebias: HA! Italy is still on the world's political avant-guarde! We starterd Berlusconism way sooner than Trump! /s

Seriously, though: if I ever hear an Amaerican joking about Italians and how stupid they were to vote a sex-addicted, bankrupter homophobe and chauvinist demagogue I'm gonna kick their ass. Hard. Like, Duke Nukem hard.
Well your nation did created Machiavellian politics.

I wonder what its like living in Renissance Italy during that time.
Post edited November 09, 2016 by Elmofongo
low rated
avatar
Telika: And here comes the endorsement by genuine (golden dawn) neonazis.
avatar
KiNgBrAdLeY7: .
avatar
Telika:
Open your eyes!

https://www.rt.com/news/365966-putin-trump-congratulates-victory/

That lady Hilary, best friend of former diplomat Albright (remember those "lovely" uranium bombs in Kossovo, fool?), is sent home, the worst has been averted already! Put your labels where the sun doesn't shine! And do take something to calm down and shoo headache! Cheers!
Post edited November 09, 2016 by KiNgBrAdLeY7
avatar
KiNgBrAdLeY7: ...Globalization will be halted, if not stopped dead in its tracks ...
avatar
Trilarion: Fat chance. Would you be willing to take a bet about that? I guess that Trump will just play nicely with his millionaire buddies. They won't change a single thing but blame someone else. You'll see.
Its HITLERS FAULT!!!!!!!!!!