So, in context, here's why I took it as harmless.
Here you have two outwardly very artsy people who hoped to appeal to a gaming market which is pretty well dominated by smacking things til they're dead. During this attempt, they felt obligated to step carefully. That is, censor themselves so as not to offend that portion of vocal gamers (or hell, that vocal portion of the internet in general) that puts the worst possible interpretation on anything said and explodes. As they both have strong criticisms of and feelings about how the world should work, keeping quiet is something that very likely made them impatient. That is, they are artists. It's their job to speak up about the world, and they put themselves in a position where they felt that they couldn't do so as freely for a while.
Anyway, they failed to appeal to the gaming market, and opted to return to a field perhaps more accepting of (or interested in!) what they had to say. Certainly, they were frustrated both by their own failure and the collection of know-it-alls who confidently explained that said failure was obvious. But also, they were somewhat relieved to have a voice again. And that was the point to the tweets you posted. (They were
explicit about this, if you read the context.) So I understood it as "
Hey, look what I can say now!" rather than some serious wish to see people harmed. The comments weren't even spoken in anger. They were part of an outwardly playful (albeit snarky and perhaps too public) conversation with a friend.
Sorry to clutter up the thread a bit. But this is where the don't-pay-for-this-game challenge was made, and so the response belongs here, too. As for the game, I've never played it.
Please see this as a friendly response, Cyraxpt.