abolat: ... (For the sake of analogy assumptions: you know the houses of the people that buy from you.)
mgarnett: I don't think that's a good analogy. You're basically asking if it's alright to commit a criminal offense to rectify a pricing mistake on M&Ms, well of course it's not right to condone break and enter to rectify a pricing mistake for chocolate.
The T&Cs at Gamersgate have two sections which could apply in this case with respect to pricing errors:
11. Indemnification
12. Termination
So your analogy should be, if I go into a shop and buy something and agree with the shop owner that I agree that they can do anything at all with respect to the goods they have sold me, including entering my house and taking them back, then I can't complain when they actually do come int my house and take the good because, well, I gave them permission to do so when I signed up to the T&Cs.
OK.... See I made my analogy based on physical goods because software is, more or less, considered to have the same properties as physical goods and hence why piracy is classified as theft. Or at least that is my understanding of it. Perhaps M&M's was not a good example (teaches me for listening to my cravings I suppose).
However, your example of the tv is not a good analogy either. The right analogy would be you agree to some terms when entering the stire (includibg the ones you mention above) the sale has been completed and they (for whatever reason) accepted your payment. They then made an announcement saying that they made a mistake but you could keep the TV and people that ordered it but had not received it yet should expect delayed shipments for 2 months. Then, they cancelled the orders not yet delivered, in-delivery orders ancanaries into your house to take back the TV and left the mOney you paid or in some cases didn't even do that. Of course it cannot be a perfect analogy but I think this is as close as it gets.
Now in the real world when compared to physical goods, if such a price mistake were to happen, I am sure the law would pretty much say that if the transaction has occurred, the seller does not have the right to take back the item and force a refund in the customer via tracking him/her down to the address and so on.
Ps: I so wish there was a separate thread dedicated to this so the deals thread wouldn't be polluted by my posting :(