And I still wonder what the greater scheme is behind all that, each nation in Europe, each government knows exactly what it gets with this policy, they knew there would be blood and casualties, perhaps even unrest at some point. And yes in my opinion Merkel has blood on her hands. Governments think in years or decades and as I said before, I do not think that politics did suddenly find altruism on the agenda from one day to the next.

The "diversity is our strength" echoes through the whole of the western world for some years now. Is it really the UN with their agendas and visions? Preparing circumstances for a rollout of police states, criminalize speech and thought(for which we see the first signs), Heiko Maas said today "We are in a state of war.", which basically means the way for martial law in Germany is open if it is officially decalred.

The only countries resisting that policy at the moment are eastern EU members, which raise the middle finger, when the EU tries to assign them to take in refugees. And the EU bodies are already working on so called "punishments" for that.

Somewhere I did find a EU paper about "replacement migration" some months ago - will look for it.

And the "refugee" influx is organized:

People trafficking
People trafficking 2

They get picked up by rescue vessels, still in the national waters of Lybia, the nearest port would be a port in Lybia..

I personally have never seen anybody attack Christianity or Islam.

Sinking the ships with the "refugees" onboard would be beneficial to everybody.
How many more Eurotards have to be sacrificed on the altar.


http://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2016/12/berlin-and-why-i-am-white-inferiorist.html

A link from the link you posted.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/737642/Syrian-Migrants-classes-women-Mr-Flirt-Germany-Horst-Wenzel-refugees

Cuck is thrown out a bit too often. Cuck this, cuck that, cuckadoodledoo. But that is a damned cuck. This is a joke right? Please tell me its a joke...

I'm glad you put bookmarks on my posts, I'm gonna flush ;)

So anyway, let's get down to it before I go to bed:

First off, I invite you go ahead and check the book "the tipping point" I'm refering to in my first sentence:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Tipping-Point-Little-Things-Difference/dp/0349113467/

Then, my sentence which got you triggered => "Some could say "it's just an excuse to beat migrants mercilessly" but stories like the "night of crystal" in Germany were in the same vein."
==>>Maybe it's badly written (you have to remember English is not my first language). So back then, the death of the Lebanese girl could have started some unrest among the Swedish population and started violence against migrants and I made a parallel with the death of Ernst Vom Rath which triggered the Kristallnacht
=>My sentence was a vague observation just like I made a vague World War 1 parallel with the killing of the Russian ambassador yesterday in the "good luck america" thread.
=>"it's just an excuse to beat migrants mercilessly" is the possible perspective("some could say") from people who would see some migrants beatings like a minor thing in the course of History while it could very well be the kickstarter of something bigger (that's why I was speaking about the "butterfly effect" in my first sentence)

Secondly, you made me laugh about being a negationist, it just goes on to show that you're pretty much ignorant about the various far-right circles (at least in the French-speaking world), you could have read this book for example:
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/books_finished_in_2016/post229
TLDR: there are different currents (and opposing ones) and the Jewish question is divisive as some see them as the "hidden rulers of the world" while the others see them as allies. I'm from the second camp as while I shit on people like Bernard Henry-Levy, I like Eric Zemmour and Elisabeth Levy.
Besides, Germans invaded and occupied my country, twice making my family suffers during those years so I will never admire them for this era.

And to finish off, I would add that contrary to you, I have some intellectual interest in things of the world in both its beauty and ugliness so that's why I daily read stuff from different point of views (from far left to right, from Israelis to antisemits, etc.) so I can get the whole picture even if it's not gonna change my points of view.

Pretty pathetic right?

I'm not shady, I just write like I speak. People like Bradley are more on the rant expressive side while I'm more detached. Just a question of temper.

This is almost unfollowable, certainly obscure and not very informative. If you could just return to the questions asked here: that would be very helpful.

Clearly comparing the use of a message and how they might have similar effects. I had assumed that the first time I read it but didn't want to presume beforehand. Point being he is definitely not a fascist.

Also point being he won't answer (in fact appears to be actively avoiding answering) the fucking questions.

Honestly you accuse someone of being facist, racist and a holocaust denier? Get a grip on the semantics of those words. I have seen nothing from Catpower that would lead me to the conclusion I need to call out racism, faaacist, Hoooolocaust denier.

Get a grip. I am sick people of throwing around those words like candies in this forum to everyone who voices something in a not "PC" tone. And "PC" basically means you can voice no opposing opinion at all.

Discussion and discourse between diiffering opinions is the foundation of progress.

I will stand down - if he will just directly answer those questions. It's always been that simple, he just has to deny it. He never has.

What does he have to deny? Why would he have to do that? Did he say the gassing of jews did not happen? Did he say I hate Afghans and they all have to die, I hate Syrains ISIS should roll them over. Did he say I like to have dictator again who throws out all foreigners out of Belgium?

NO, he did not say anything like that.

Those statements and I would occur would provide a basis for your accusations. But because you "believe" his statements might point in that direction "he is" is just laughable.

Thank you so much for this post!

You strike me as someone who would be against McArthyism yet you are using those very tactics.