Don't you have the email with the order confirmation?

What would Windows 7 have to do with it? Version 1.61 still runs in 7. Just don't apply the DLSS patch or any patches after it, assuming you get the game back.

Have you bought it here on GOG? Or on some cheap key-reseller site?
That's what...
1) order confirmation emails from GOG and
2) payment confirmation emails from PayPal/your bank/etc
...are for.

https://www.gog.com/forum/general/cyberpunk_2077_got_removed_from_my_library/post37

Wouldn't be the first person to claim that they bought the game here, only to later confirm that -in fact- it was purchased somewhere else.

Which is why I also stated the confirmation emails (both from GOG and from the payment service used) as proof which is independent from the "Games List" and the "Orders History".

Should be no problem finding the proof of a GOG purchase...

Yeah, you can confront GoG with proof of purchase, from your payment provider.
Even better if you didn't delete GoG e-mails, I always get one for my purchase, even if 1 e-mail for multiple purchases. You should have one. If deleted from client software, go to server and check if still there.

You don't like to read replies, do you?
I told you already: lots of people here on GOG have been asked in the past in comparable cases (most often even related to CP2077 - because everyone wanted that, but not everyone wanted to pay €50,- for it), whether they have bought the game here.
And most often their first reaction was "Yes!".
Some have been asked again (answer: "didn't you read my reply to userX? I already said "yes!")...
and again (answer: "how often do I have to tell this: yes - I bought it here on GOG!!!")...
only to finally confirm that
- they didn't buy it here but on a cheap key-reseller site, or
- they didn't buy it here but got it gifted from seomeone else (who had bought it on a cheap key-reseller site), or
- they had indeed bought it, but on a different account, etc, etc,...

With that said: what's the point of your comment again..?

That you're wasting your time continuing to interrogate the OP. He's got the email address. He'll either use it or not.

Exposing a fake or a mistake serves nothing right now because the OP isn't continuing the thread at the moment.

Your comments make less and less sense.
The person I replied to (and which you refer to as "OP") has entered this chat at "post #35"...a whopping 10,5 months after this thread got created.

If you don't like me asking other people (aka: people that aren't you) questions...simply ignore my posts.

I meant the Original Poster who restarted the thread.

But you're right. If you want to continue an argument with someone else, who am I to judge? Enjoy your ulcer you're heading for.

The person who restarted this thread was Mikael74...with post #35...the person I replied to.
OP has last be seen on July 07, 2022.

Potato, tomato. Poster who resurrected the thread. Is there a quick term for that?

Quibble on the definition if you like, I WAS REFERRING TO MIKAEL.

Sorry if that was too frighteningly difficult to comprehend.

Yeah well, you know: ...words have meanings...OP means "Original Poster", aka: "the person who started a thread".

If you use words with a cartain meaning, but apply a different meaning to them, that is only known to you, the comprehension factor amongst other people will be terrifying low.
That's kind of how things work...

Oho! You got me. Now I'm wasting my time as well! Touche!

Goodnight, then.