It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
The DRM-Free Revolution Continues with Big Pre-Orders and Launch Day Releases!

Good news! GOG.com is going to bring you more fantastic launch day releases, preorders, and other exciting new content from some of our favorite developers. We've lined up 3 big titles that we will be bringing to GOG.com in the next couple of months for sale or preorder that we think will be hits with all of our gamers; and we have more equally exciting games coming up soon.

If you've been a member of the site for a long time, you may recall that when we launched sales of The Witcher 2 on GOG.com, we had to add in regional pricing. The game cost different amounts in in the US, the UK, the European Union, and Australia. We're doing something like that once again in order to bring you new titles from fantastic bigger studios. Since we don't accept currencies other than USD on GOG.com right now, we'll be charging the equivalent of the local price in USD for these titles. We wish that we could offer these games at flat prices everywhere in the world, but the decision on pricing is always in our partners' hands, and regional pricing is becoming the standard around the globe. We're doing this because we believe that there's no better way to accomplish our overall goals for DRM-Free gaming and GOG.com. We need more games, devs, and publishers on board to make DRM-Free gaming something that's standard for all of the gaming world!

That brings with it more good news, though! As mentioned, we have three games we're launching soon with regional pricing--two RPGs and a strategy game--and while we can't tell you what they are yet because breaking an NDA has more severe penalties than just getting a noogie, we're confident that you'll be as excited about these games as we are. For a limited time, we will be offering anyone who pre-orders or buys one of them a free game from a selection as a gift from GOG.com, just like we did for The Witcher 2.

If you have any questions, hit us up in the comments below and we'll be happy to answer (to the best of our ability).

EDIT: Since we've answered a lot of the common questions already here (and lest you think that we've ignored you), it may be handy for you to check out the forum thread about this and search for staff answers by clicking this link here. (hat tip to user Eli who reminded us that the feature even exists. :)
avatar
JohnnyDollar: You're right, it's not a big surprise. I still have this sneaky suspicion that AOW III is one of those 3 games, though. XD
avatar
Grargar: The reveal was the biggest disappointment out of everything. I didn't care so much about the price hike, but to drop these bad news, disguised as good news, to make a big deal out of 3 supposedly NDA-hidden games, only to reveal that these were games we actually knew were coming, well, that was something else. I regret ever posting what I posted above, but I won't edit it though; let this be a lesson to my future self.
You were working off of what's been communicated to us. I'm just kidding around with you by quoting those posts.

After investigating it a little, I was leaning towards not taking some elements literally. I'm usually a little suspicious with stuff like that as it is. Since I try to stay neutral when it comes to expectations, the reveal doesn't really make me sink with disappointment.

Like i said in another thread, with that event coming up and TW3 as well, they've timed this with the TW3 run-up. They've gotten the best games they could get in this time frame.
avatar
somebodyspecial: You're kind of doing the same thing you accuse him of. As if your opinion counts most ;) I couldn't care less about regional pricing (complain to your country, not here). They can list if it is REGIONAL or not in each games page so you know, but is there anywhere else that doesn't use regional crap? I would have a problem with ANY DRM as DRM FREE is why I'm here, not pricing (I wait for sales or price drops anyway, not just on GOG-not much is worth retail to me in games over $30). But I freely admit I like not having ANY game in the catalog having DRM just to simplify stuff. If I want a DRM game (and I don't, skipped Diablo 3 until they remove the RMAH, which I'm guessing will come with expansion pack as they already did this on xbox), I will go to amazon or something. I expect NO DRM here period. NEVER cave, or I won't come back either ;) As I said I'm here for ONE REASON.

Instead of complaining about something so easily fixed learn how to buy games without paying regional fees. USA VPN/proxy. Problem solved. Get one that has servers all over the world so you can live anywhere you want daily...LOL. This allows GOG to get games that would otherwise be a problem, and allows you to still avoid the fees. So publishers are happy (the jerks who do this) and you get the games while ignoring publisher rules...LOL Some VPN's keep you from changing as often but most people just need to look like they are in USA or one other and only switch to purchase once or twice a month. Like you might want to show USA for purchase but UK for netflix or something.

I'm surprised ANY customer on GOG is from anywhere but USA...LOL Paysafecard+VPN. You would never know where I'm at. Not sure you couldn't just use Paypal also. They probably wouldn't be giving your location to GOG either, thus removing the paysafecard step for most, but either way you can BEAT the system. Heck for just purchasing you could probably just google "free vpn service" and use one of many as I just did the search (lots). Someone should verify the paypal comment, but paysafecard can be bought anyway with cash etc. GOG probably added paysafecard precisely for this reason ;) Why should GOG allow Steam etc to sell games that they could have in their catalog with regional crap on them? That isn't DRM so I don't care.

You are complaining about nothing, as it's easily solved and having regional crap must get a few more games (or at least make their life easier in some way) or why would GOG bother? I don't agree with going regional on any game they already have NO regional pricing on (no need for that, you already have it), and agree with you on that point. But for new games I care not, and if I wasn't in USA already, you bet your butt I'd be using a VPN (free or otherwise) and always LOOK like I'm in USA for purchasing. Not so easy on steam games as you have connections to them all the time for community crap etc (I hate steam, will never use it for windows, I'll probably load steamOS at some point but have no desire for it in windows), so unless you're using a PAID VPN you'll hate life over there. The paid ones are of course very fast if you do your homework and buy smart for your country. Some VPN's have really great services from USA to elsewhere, and some from other countries to elsewhere etc, you just have to pick the one that fits your needs best and has great connections (speed or maybe latency if needed for games) from the country you're trying to be in to your actual country. That isn't hard info to find as millions are trying to do the same thing ;)

That said, regional crap isn't an issue for GOG buyers as you're only on to BUY and then download the game. After that you don't need to come back from a VPN again until you buy more games. You might just BUY, then download from your real country, as I don't think GOG checks that, just the purchase itself. I mean I could be on a trip to japan or something and need to re-download a game already in my games list purchased ages ago. You can re-tax me or something with a "hey you can't download out of your country" message (maybe they do this?). Once purchased you should be able to go right to a download OFF vpn's. But I may be wrong on this point, still so what I say, as you download once usually. There are some VERY fast VPN's, that will saturate most of the fastest connections out there. You seem ignorant of what a VPN/proxy is for. Hope that's cleared up now ;)

EA/Bethesda/Blizzard have other ways to sell to you, no need for GOG for these guys and they all LOVE DRM so you won't see them here until 50% of the world hates DRM and just comes here instead (or price reduced so much DRM can be left off once a year etc of early sales are over at $60 or something). Once DRM hurts their bottom line enough they'll change, but until then they will say screw you. UBI etc can unwrap/take out drm from their games any time they want. They've done it many times once the game goes to another publisher in jewel case for $9.99 or something. They axe the DRM, box, etc. You don't usually put in DRM with no plan to remove it in case it totally backfires on them. How many games are NOT on gamecopyworld etc? Not many ;) An ignorant person deals with DRM, while the Webucated guy (ROFL - is that a new word?) just removes it seconds after he buys his game anyway. I'm not advocating flying a skull/bones flag here, just if you buy it you should be able to do whatever you want with it. I don't call serials DRM either. It has no affect on my gaming or my machine and stops most newbs (from flying the wrong flag...LOL) while allowing online stuff and a way to ban gamers for cheating in a way that hurts (don't want your code to die ;)).

Regional crap will cost ZERO customers IMHO. Easily avoided. If they go about ratting out devs for this, that dev may just never come back. GOG isn't big enough to rat anyone out yet. Steam could/should though, they are huge.
Um, why should I or anyone else, have to use workarounds to get around a flawed policy? You either support the policy or you don't - there is no point in supporting a broken policy because you can do a workaround. If everybody is going to use the workaround, then what is the point of the policy in the first place?

As for "kind of doing the same thing you accuse him of" - there is a difference. Although don't really care too much about DRM, I am not ignoring it as one of GOG.com's key selling points. More importantly, since this discussion has now boiled down to whether or not Worldwide Pricing is important, as the person who is refuting the argument that it is not important, I only have to provide a single counter example, of which my own is more than valid.

You could say that my opinion counts most, but only because I only need my opinion to counter the argument. Not that I just have my opinion - my inbox is rapidly filling up with people who are agreeing with my arguments.

This discussion is only about DRM, in the fact that DRM-Free is another one of GOG's principles. If GOG.com can easily forgo Worldwide Pricing because of the industry standard, how long will it really be before they cave in and forgo DRM-Free as well, for exactly the same reasons?

This debate is taking place now, to show that people are not happy with the ease with which GOG.com has with abandoning their core principles. Especially when it has been done in such an underhand manner, without even consulting the consumer base that has backed them for so long, and is being portrayed as in our best interests.

The reason for such passion in the debate, is because GOG.com still has time to change their mind on this policy. They still have time to turn back from the brink, and remain an industry champion rather than just another online distributor. It is quite clear that the motivation for Regional Pricing is simply money, and has nothing to do with improving the service for their customer.

However, this is an alarming trend - because it seems to be appearing that money is also the motivating factor with DRM-Free - since without DRM, GOG.com can make a larger profit and sell more games. But the concern is once again, how long before their DRM stance changes, particularly if money and profit is their motivating drive?

People are willing to give GOG.com the benefit of the doubt, and write this off as an experiment. Such experiments drive innovation and further the industry. But it is uncertain how long people will continue to do this for GOG.com. It is uncertain how long people will continue to trust GOG.com at their word, when their word appears to mean so little.
avatar
JohnnyDollar: You were working off of what's been communicated to us. I'm just kidding around with you by quoting those posts.

After investigating it a little, I was leaning towards not taking some elements literally. I'm usually a little suspicious with stuff like that as it is. Since I try to stay neutral when it comes to expectations, the reveal doesn't really make me sink with disappointment.

Like i said in another thread, with that event coming up and TW3 as well, they've timed this with the TW3 run-up. They've gotten the best games they could get in this time frame.
The egg on my face is totally deserved. Hmm, perhaps this could be an idea for my new avatar, especially since I failed 4 in February. (4 in Failuary perhaps?)
Post edited February 26, 2014 by Grargar
That's not even how arguing works. Normally the people stating "was barely scraping by and simply had to take the regionally priced games" should provide evidence as they were the ones to bring forth this point. The burden of truth is on them.
avatar
Future_Suture: That's not even how arguing works. Normally the people stating "was barely scraping by and simply had to take the regionally priced games" should provide evidence as they were the ones to bring forth this point. The burden of truth is on them.
You're right, that's not how arguing here works. It's going to stay a "point" for proponents of this change until these facts are shoved down everyone's throats.
avatar
Davane: Um, both view points are based on the idea that your views, needs, and drives are the only ones of any relevance.
No, they aren't. I acknowledged that flat prices was one of their values, while you claimed that just because they dropped that, they also "ditched what made them unique" (conveniently ignoring the major aspect that makes them unique in the first place: DRM-free).

You prefer flat pricing over certain titles being available DRM-free with regional prices? Fine, it's your preference. Don't buy them. But let others have the choice.
Post edited February 26, 2014 by Alexrd
avatar
Davane: Um, both view points are based on the idea that your views, needs, and drives are the only ones of any relevance.
avatar
Alexrd: No, they aren't. I acknowledged that flat prices was one of their values, while you claimed that just because they dropped that, they also "ditched what made them unique" (conveniently ignoring the major aspect that makes them unique in the first place: DRM-free).

You prefer flat pricing over certain titles being available DRM-free with regional prices? Fine, it's your preference. Don't buy them. But let others have the choice.
It was not that their fair pricing itself made them unique. It was sticking to their principles. Maybe this video will convince you. They said it all themselves.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6P3yOTR2Vc&t=1194

Until these changes, DRM on GOG was unthinkable. Now it's not.
avatar
Artoemius: It was not that their fair pricing itself made them unique. It was sticking to their principles. Maybe this video will convince you. They said it all themselves.
What's with the strawman? What part of "I acknowledged that flat prices was one of their values" did you not understand?

avatar
Artoemius: Until these changes, DRM on GOG was unthinkable. Now it's not.
Really? Since DRM is what makes GOG stand out from its competition, it would be a very naive thing to even think they will ever put DRM on GOG. But hey, nobody is stopping you from doing it. Let me know when they do, ok?
Post edited February 26, 2014 by Alexrd
avatar
JohnnyDollar: You're right, it's not a big surprise. I still have this sneaky suspicion that AOW III is one of those 3 games, though. XD
avatar
Grargar: The reveal was the biggest disappointment out of everything. I didn't care so much about the price hike, but to drop these bad news, disguised as good news, to make a big deal out of 3 supposedly NDA-hidden games, only to reveal that these were games we actually knew were coming, well, that was something else. I regret ever posting what I posted above, but I won't edit it though; let this be a lesson to my future self.
It is like the one time GOG introduced Mac OS support and support for another mystery operating system. Everybody thought it would be Linux. Turns out that whoever wrote that announcement was either a pathetic troll or simply shouldn't write announcements because of their poor English skills as that mystery operating system turned out to be Mac OS. Yes, Mac OS. Again. I don't remember GOG ever apologising for that one. The wording for that announcement was infuriatingly bad.
avatar
JohnnyDollar: You're right, it's not a big surprise. I still have this sneaky suspicion that AOW III is one of those 3 games, though. XD
avatar
Grargar: The reveal was the biggest disappointment out of everything. I didn't care so much about the price hike, but to drop these bad news, disguised as good news, to make a big deal out of 3 supposedly NDA-hidden games, only to reveal that these were games we actually knew were coming, well, that was something else. I regret ever posting what I posted above, but I won't edit it though; let this be a lesson to my future self.
I agree with this. With all the secrecy & talk of NDAs, with the way these games were being hyped up as if they were games we didn't know about already and with this being such a significant change in policy, I was expecting something that would have been really surprising, something that would have represented a major breakthrough. The way they handled this set expectations that they were unable to meet.

I guess all we can do now is hope that it helps with getting DRM-free releases of bigger titles and signing up more major publishers as much as GOG thinks it will.
Post edited February 26, 2014 by adamhm
avatar
Alexrd: I acknowledged that flat prices was one of their values, while you claimed that just because they dropped that, they also "ditched what made them unique" (conveniently ignoring the major aspect that makes them unique in the first place: DRM-free).
Actually DRM-free on its own never made Gog unique. There are other places to buy DRM-free games.
avatar
silentbob1138: Actually DRM-free on its own never made Gog unique. There are other places to buy DRM-free games.
There are other places you can get DRM-free games, but very, very few that insist that everything they sell is DRM-free (and AFAIK none of those places are as old and experienced as GOG or have anywhere near as much influence as GOG does).
avatar
silentbob1138: Actually DRM-free on its own never made Gog unique. There are other places to buy DRM-free games.
avatar
adamhm: There are other places you can get DRM-free games, but very, very few that insist that everything they sell is DRM-free (and AFAIK none of those places are as old and experienced as GOG or have anywhere near as much influence as GOG does).
Still, if you want DRM-free there are alternatives to Gog. I can't think of another store that offered DRM-free and fair prices and kept old games running on modern computers, though. That combination made Gog unique. DRM-free was a big part of the uniqueness, but not unique on its own.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: These numbers didn't feel right from what I could vaguely remember and now I know why - this is only the first quarter of 2013.

Selderij was kind enough to dig up the sources that reveal the full picture
The most recent is from Nov 2013. The translation says:

Dynamically growing service GOG.com which the Group CD PROJECT responsible for the segment "global digital distribution of games" since the beginning of the year has already developed zł 42.33 million of revenue which translated into 7.78 million zł net profit.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: That's more than $2.5 million net profit with almost two months left before the year was out - most importantly these results don't include the Insomnia and the Winter Sales.

EDIT: For 2012, these numbers were zł 46.30 million of revenue and 8.20 million zł net profit.
Yah, that's why I wrote "Personally I know I could retire with four quarters of $900,000 profits" in my response, as I had picked up the numbers represented only one quarter. It's a pretty fair chunk of cash, and frankly surprises me, especially given the 80% sales and such. I didn't realise this was such a strong revenue stream.
avatar
adamhm: There are other places you can get DRM-free games, but very, very few that insist that everything they sell is DRM-free (and AFAIK none of those places are as old and experienced as GOG or have anywhere near as much influence as GOG does).
avatar
silentbob1138: Still, if you want DRM-free there are alternatives to Gog. I can't think of another store that offered DRM-free and fair prices and kept old games running on modern computers, though. That combination made Gog unique. DRM-free was a big part of the uniqueness, but not unique on its own.
But I can't think of any stores (besides GOG) that have a strict DRM-free policy. Sure, you can get a bunch of titles DRM-free from Desura, HumbleBundle, and IndieGameStand... but on those storefronts it's not required that the games hosted be DRM-free.